Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SIDE EFFECTS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS VERSUS COPPER T IUCD: A SIX-MONTH STUDY

View through CrossRef
Background: This study examines long-term contraceptives, specifically comparing levonorgestrel implants and copper IUCDs, focusing on their effectiveness and side effects. The goal was to evaluate the performance and acceptance of Levonorgestrel implants versus copper IUCDs, documenting side effects for each method. Methods: Conducted at the Obstetrics & Gynecology Departments of PAF Hospital Islamabad and PAF Hospital, Kamra from December 2023 to May 2024. The study enrolled women opting for levonorgestrel implants or copper IUCDs. Out of an intended study sample of 166, 145 women aged 20-40 participated. Those using other contraceptives or with medical contraindications were excluded. Follow-ups over six months collected data on side effects and demographics, analyzed with SPSS-22, considering p s 0.05 significant. Results: Among 145 women, primarily 26-30 years old, those with lUCDs reported more pre­study menstrual irregularities (83.3%) than Levonorgestrel implant users (61.7%). Levonorgestrel implants resulted in fewer side effects like dysmenorrhea and headaches. Conclusion: Levonorgestrel implants and copper IUCDs are both effective at preventing pregnancy. Levonorgestrel implants, however, led to fewer side effects such as menstrual changes and weight gain, favoring its use. Both methods maintained high satisfaction after six months.
Title: COMPARISON OF CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SIDE EFFECTS OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS VERSUS COPPER T IUCD: A SIX-MONTH STUDY
Description:
Background: This study examines long-term contraceptives, specifically comparing levonorgestrel implants and copper IUCDs, focusing on their effectiveness and side effects.
The goal was to evaluate the performance and acceptance of Levonorgestrel implants versus copper IUCDs, documenting side effects for each method.
Methods: Conducted at the Obstetrics & Gynecology Departments of PAF Hospital Islamabad and PAF Hospital, Kamra from December 2023 to May 2024.
The study enrolled women opting for levonorgestrel implants or copper IUCDs.
Out of an intended study sample of 166, 145 women aged 20-40 participated.
Those using other contraceptives or with medical contraindications were excluded.
Follow-ups over six months collected data on side effects and demographics, analyzed with SPSS-22, considering p s 0.
05 significant.
 Results: Among 145 women, primarily 26-30 years old, those with lUCDs reported more pre­study menstrual irregularities (83.
3%) than Levonorgestrel implant users (61.
7%).
Levonorgestrel implants resulted in fewer side effects like dysmenorrhea and headaches.
Conclusion: Levonorgestrel implants and copper IUCDs are both effective at preventing pregnancy.
Levonorgestrel implants, however, led to fewer side effects such as menstrual changes and weight gain, favoring its use.
Both methods maintained high satisfaction after six months.

Related Results

Effect of Levonorgestrel Implant on Lactation and Infant Growth: A Review
Effect of Levonorgestrel Implant on Lactation and Infant Growth: A Review
Background: Family Planning is a way to regulate the number of children born and the spacing of pregnancies through information, education, and the use of contraceptives. Postpartu...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Copper IUD does not increase incidence of vaginal and pelvic infection; internal vaginal douching does: a cross-sectional study
Copper IUD does not increase incidence of vaginal and pelvic infection; internal vaginal douching does: a cross-sectional study
Abstract Background: We compared the rate, type, and severity of vulvovaginitis in women who are practicing internal vaginal douching (IVD) or not while using an intrauteri...
COMPARISON OF INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION AFTER NORMAL VAGINAL DELIVERY VERSUS INTRA CESAREAN
COMPARISON OF INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION AFTER NORMAL VAGINAL DELIVERY VERSUS INTRA CESAREAN
  INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) and contraceptive implant are safe and highly effective for most females, including adolescents. The success of IUCD i...
Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Purpose To assess the clinical outcomes of zirconia dental implants based on an updated systematic literature review. ...
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
AbstractBackgroundDental implant‐retained overdentures have been chosen as the treatment of choice for complete mandibular removable dentures. Dental implants, such as mini dental ...
Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background Short implants are proposed as a less invasive alternative with fewer complications than standard implants in combination with s...

Back to Top