Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Materiality of Interaction
View through CrossRef
This book about the materiality of interaction is not only concerned with how materials and how the notion of materiality is related to interaction design, but as we shift perspectives from representations to materials we also need to look closely at this central notion of interaction and we need to discuss what it is, and if a shift of perspectives here also has implications for how this term should and can be used in the context of interaction design – and when designing for interaction. And even more fundamentally, the title of this book is ‘the materiality of interaction’ and not ‘the materiality of a computer’ so at this point it is probably a good idea to reflect upon what we mean when we say that we do interaction design, how we define this term interaction, and how we see interaction as being at least partly a material matter. This chapter is devoted to these essential questions.
Title: The Materiality of Interaction
Description:
This book about the materiality of interaction is not only concerned with how materials and how the notion of materiality is related to interaction design, but as we shift perspectives from representations to materials we also need to look closely at this central notion of interaction and we need to discuss what it is, and if a shift of perspectives here also has implications for how this term should and can be used in the context of interaction design – and when designing for interaction.
And even more fundamentally, the title of this book is ‘the materiality of interaction’ and not ‘the materiality of a computer’ so at this point it is probably a good idea to reflect upon what we mean when we say that we do interaction design, how we define this term interaction, and how we see interaction as being at least partly a material matter.
This chapter is devoted to these essential questions.
Related Results
Examining the extent of and drivers for materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports
Examining the extent of and drivers for materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports
Purpose
This paper aims to evaluate the extent of materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports and their determinants. The study examines the di...
Materiality in the context of audit: the real expectations gap
Materiality in the context of audit: the real expectations gap
PurposeThis paper seeks to focus on the issue of materiality judgements and the need for public disclosure of materiality levels. Insights about the concept of materiality are draw...
Materiality in Performing an Audit – Experimental Evidence
Materiality in Performing an Audit – Experimental Evidence
At present, ways to improve audit quality and auditing decisions are intensively being discussed worldwide by standard setters and researchers. Audit quality is mainly influenced b...
Korea at a Regulatory Crossroads: Double Materiality and the Future of ESG Accountability
Korea at a Regulatory Crossroads: Double Materiality and the Future of ESG Accountability
The European Union's adoption of double materiality through the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) has introduced a major divergence in global corporate accountabi...
Harmonization and fragmentation in competing ESG materiality regimes and their implications for sustainability reporting
Harmonization and fragmentation in competing ESG materiality regimes and their implications for sustainability reporting
Abstract
Purpose
The rapid development of ESG reporting practices raises cross-border pressures regarding convergence tow...
Materiality concept(s) in the EU sustainability (non-financial) reporting: the challenge of equivalence
Materiality concept(s) in the EU sustainability (non-financial) reporting: the challenge of equivalence
This paper presents different materiality concepts in sustainability reporting. At present, two main streams of materiality concepts in sustainability reporting are single and doub...
How Do Investor and Auditor Materiality Judgments Compare?
How Do Investor and Auditor Materiality Judgments Compare?
SUMMARY
Materiality remains a challenging concept for auditors to implement in practice. The challenges underlying auditor materiality assessments are compounded by ...
The Audit Expectation Gap between Companies and Their Auditors: An Exploratory Study
The Audit Expectation Gap between Companies and Their Auditors: An Exploratory Study
This exploratory study aims to provide insight into the audit expectation gap between companies and their auditors measured by the materiality for the financial statement as a whol...

