Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Korea at a Regulatory Crossroads: Double Materiality and the Future of ESG Accountability

View through CrossRef
The European Union's adoption of double materiality through the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) has introduced a major divergence in global corporate accountability standards, contrasting stakeholder-inclusive reporting with the United States' investor-focused single materiality model. This regulatory split places Korea at a pivotal juncture, balancing export-oriented ties to the EU with structural integration into U.S. capital markets. Double materiality expands disclosure obligations to include not only financial risks but also the social and environmental impacts of corporate activity-fundamentally reframing corporate accountability and reinforcing the relevance of business and human rights due diligence. Despite this shift, Korea's Financial Services Commission has delayed ESG disclosure mandates and avoided adopting a clear materiality definition, reflecting institutional tensions between Korea's industrial policy legacy and growing demands for stakeholder accountability. Korean firms with substantial EU operations already face binding obligations under the CSRD's extraterritorial reach, creating regulatory fragmentation and governance incoherence. This study offers a comparative legal-policy analysis of Korea's strategic choices, evaluating materiality frameworks against four criteria: regulatory coherence, international alignment, stakeholder responsiveness, and implementation feasibility. It examines the EU's codification of double materiality, U.S. doctrinal resistance grounded in securities law, and Korea's fragmented regulatory posture. The paper concludes that Korea's optimal approach is phased implementation-starting with financial materiality aligned with ISSB standards, while preparing institutional capacity for future expansion to impact materiality. The choice of materiality framework is not merely technical, but a foundational decision on the future scope of corporate accountability in a globally integrated economy, with far-reaching implications for ESG governance and human rights.
Institute of Legal Studies, Kyung Hee University
Title: Korea at a Regulatory Crossroads: Double Materiality and the Future of ESG Accountability
Description:
The European Union's adoption of double materiality through the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) has introduced a major divergence in global corporate accountability standards, contrasting stakeholder-inclusive reporting with the United States' investor-focused single materiality model.
This regulatory split places Korea at a pivotal juncture, balancing export-oriented ties to the EU with structural integration into U.
S.
capital markets.
Double materiality expands disclosure obligations to include not only financial risks but also the social and environmental impacts of corporate activity-fundamentally reframing corporate accountability and reinforcing the relevance of business and human rights due diligence.
Despite this shift, Korea's Financial Services Commission has delayed ESG disclosure mandates and avoided adopting a clear materiality definition, reflecting institutional tensions between Korea's industrial policy legacy and growing demands for stakeholder accountability.
Korean firms with substantial EU operations already face binding obligations under the CSRD's extraterritorial reach, creating regulatory fragmentation and governance incoherence.
This study offers a comparative legal-policy analysis of Korea's strategic choices, evaluating materiality frameworks against four criteria: regulatory coherence, international alignment, stakeholder responsiveness, and implementation feasibility.
It examines the EU's codification of double materiality, U.
S.
doctrinal resistance grounded in securities law, and Korea's fragmented regulatory posture.
The paper concludes that Korea's optimal approach is phased implementation-starting with financial materiality aligned with ISSB standards, while preparing institutional capacity for future expansion to impact materiality.
The choice of materiality framework is not merely technical, but a foundational decision on the future scope of corporate accountability in a globally integrated economy, with far-reaching implications for ESG governance and human rights.

Related Results

Assessing Environmental Social Governance in Zambia's Banking Sector
Assessing Environmental Social Governance in Zambia's Banking Sector
Environmental Social Governance (ESG) has taken centre stage in the global financial sector due to pressing global challenges such as natural disasters and climate change, governan...
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research
PurposeThis paper aims to examine the state of research on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research. This paper disc...
ESG materiality issues on stock returns: Stock Exchange of Thailand
ESG materiality issues on stock returns: Stock Exchange of Thailand
This study investigates the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) materiality issues on stock returns in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Leveraging data from ...
The Impact of ESG Investing on Portfolio Performance: An Empirical Study of Emerging Markets
The Impact of ESG Investing on Portfolio Performance: An Empirical Study of Emerging Markets
ESG investment, which stands for environmental, social, and governance investing, has become an important strategy in the global financial markets, and its applications are becomin...
UNCOVERING DIVERSIFICATION BENEFITS: RETURN SPILLOVERS IN USA ESG AND NON-ESG ORIENTED BANKS
UNCOVERING DIVERSIFICATION BENEFITS: RETURN SPILLOVERS IN USA ESG AND NON-ESG ORIENTED BANKS
The balance sheet is a source of interconnectedness among financial products and affect the overall system of economics. Due to interest of investors in the market’s connectedness,...
Sustainable Investing - Does ESG Induce a Virtuous Circle?
Sustainable Investing - Does ESG Induce a Virtuous Circle?
A környezeti, társadalmi és gazdasági rendszerek fenntarthatóságának szavatolása jelentős kihívás elé állítja korunk társadalmát. A klímaváltozás mérséklésére 2016-ban megkötött pá...
ESG INTEGRATION IN FINANCIAL SECTORS: A CASE OF SUSTAINABILITY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
ESG INTEGRATION IN FINANCIAL SECTORS: A CASE OF SUSTAINABILITY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
Purpose: The integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in the financial sector, aiming to comprehend the present tactics, evaluating the efficiency of sust...
A novel ESG Materiality methodology combining criterion level and sector-based approaches.
A novel ESG Materiality methodology combining criterion level and sector-based approaches.
As the ESG principles are rapidly becoming critical in the decision-making process of investment undertaking, companies must deal with ESG reporting either to fulfil obligatory req...

Back to Top