Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Parthian-Roman Wars

View through CrossRef
Founded and ruled by the Arsacid royal family, the Parthian empire (c. 250 bce–227 ce) was the native Iranian empire that filled the power vacuum in the Middle East in the midst of Seleucid decline. Arsacid interaction with the Roman empire began in the mid-90s bce, eventually established the Euphrates river as a shared border, and was peaceful in nature till 54 bce. In that year, the first of four cycles of Parthian-Roman wars began. Since the Romans carried out the initial large-scale mobilization of troops that introduced most of these wars, it is appropriate to associate these four cycles with the various Romans who coordinated the Roman military efforts: (a) Crassus to Antony (54–30 bce); (b) Nero (57–63 ce); (c) Trajan (114–117 ce); and (d) Lucius Verus to Macrinus (161–217 ce). The fundamental causes for these conflicts were Roman imperialism, which was well ingrained by the 1st century bce, and Parthian imperialism, which accelerated in the 2nd century bce, probably accompanied by the Arsacids’ attempts to present themselves as successors to the Achaemenid dynasty. These traditions led the Romans and Parthians to expand their spheres of power such that they came to meet in Armenia and Mesopotamia, over which regions they fought at different points for the three-century period of their empires’ coexistence. Even so, Rome and Parthia enjoyed lengthy periods of peace. Conflict was neither inevitable nor constant. In many cases (particularly in the late 1st century bce and 1st century ce), Romans and Parthians alike preferred peace and succeeded in maintaining it; but they presented diplomatic negotiations and limited military actions in ways that proclaimed hostility and martial victory (real and imagined). In this way, however, the persistent image of conflict conditioned the Roman people, especially, to accept and even expect such war. This aggressive anti-Parthian rhetoric, for example, enabled Emperor Trajan to break with years of peace and invade Mesopotamia (114–117 ce). In this way, the image of Parthian-Roman war was made a reality.
Title: Parthian-Roman Wars
Description:
Founded and ruled by the Arsacid royal family, the Parthian empire (c.
250 bce–227 ce) was the native Iranian empire that filled the power vacuum in the Middle East in the midst of Seleucid decline.
Arsacid interaction with the Roman empire began in the mid-90s bce, eventually established the Euphrates river as a shared border, and was peaceful in nature till 54 bce.
In that year, the first of four cycles of Parthian-Roman wars began.
Since the Romans carried out the initial large-scale mobilization of troops that introduced most of these wars, it is appropriate to associate these four cycles with the various Romans who coordinated the Roman military efforts: (a) Crassus to Antony (54–30 bce); (b) Nero (57–63 ce); (c) Trajan (114–117 ce); and (d) Lucius Verus to Macrinus (161–217 ce).
The fundamental causes for these conflicts were Roman imperialism, which was well ingrained by the 1st century bce, and Parthian imperialism, which accelerated in the 2nd century bce, probably accompanied by the Arsacids’ attempts to present themselves as successors to the Achaemenid dynasty.
These traditions led the Romans and Parthians to expand their spheres of power such that they came to meet in Armenia and Mesopotamia, over which regions they fought at different points for the three-century period of their empires’ coexistence.
Even so, Rome and Parthia enjoyed lengthy periods of peace.
Conflict was neither inevitable nor constant.
In many cases (particularly in the late 1st century bce and 1st century ce), Romans and Parthians alike preferred peace and succeeded in maintaining it; but they presented diplomatic negotiations and limited military actions in ways that proclaimed hostility and martial victory (real and imagined).
In this way, however, the persistent image of conflict conditioned the Roman people, especially, to accept and even expect such war.
This aggressive anti-Parthian rhetoric, for example, enabled Emperor Trajan to break with years of peace and invade Mesopotamia (114–117 ce).
In this way, the image of Parthian-Roman war was made a reality.

Related Results

Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
<p><em><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-langua...
PARTHIAN KINGDOM –STATE OF IRANIANS-ZOROASTRIANS IN IRAN AND CENTRAL ASIA
PARTHIAN KINGDOM –STATE OF IRANIANS-ZOROASTRIANS IN IRAN AND CENTRAL ASIA
This article is about the Parthian migrations and wars. The ancestors of the Parthians were the Dakh tribes, who came from the Southern Urals. They were an eastern Iranian nomadic ...
A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
If I find out that you have bought a $90 red light sabre, Tara, well there's going to be trouble. -- Kevin Brabazon A few Saturdays ago, my 71-year old father tried to...
Crescimento de feijoeiro sob influência de carvão vegetal e esterco bovino
Crescimento de feijoeiro sob influência de carvão vegetal e esterco bovino
<p align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span><span lang="pt-BR">É indiscutível a import...
The Parthian Empire
The Parthian Empire
The history of the Parthian Empire traditionally begins in 247 bce, when the founder of the Arsacid dynasty, Arsaces I, seized control of the Seleucid satrapy of Parthia (Parthyaia...

Back to Top