Javascript must be enabled to continue!
‘Herakles is stronger, Seleucus’
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Chapter 8 offers a close reading of fragments from the local histories of Pontic Herakleia written by Nymphis in the middle of the third century bce and by Memnon over two hundred years later. It argues that in the Hellenistic period local historiography, as a performative and parenetic medium, afforded citizens of Greek poleis a cautious means of articulating ideologies of independence in the face of foreign kings and empires. The chapter takes its title from a patriotic retort allegedly delivered by the Herakliote philosopher Chamaileon to Seleucus I in 280 bce, a slogan that served for Nymphis as a founding charter of Herakleian autonomy and local identity in the Black Sea region. Yet emic expressions of local historiography, like Nymphis’s history, were by and large the prerogative of autonomous Greek communities: histories of poleis that had been conquered by the Macedonian kings or by Rome tended to be written by non-locals, a phenomenon exemplified by the epitomes of the Aristotelian Politeiai published in the middle of the second century bce by the diplomat and scholar Herakleides Lembos. And when Memnon wrote his own history at the tail end of the Hellenistic period, after Herakleia’s hopes of independence had been decisively extinguished by Roman expansion, he did so with far different aims; the resulting narrative was less an exhortation to local resistance than an exercise in nostalgia.
Title: ‘Herakles is stronger, Seleucus’
Description:
Abstract
Chapter 8 offers a close reading of fragments from the local histories of Pontic Herakleia written by Nymphis in the middle of the third century bce and by Memnon over two hundred years later.
It argues that in the Hellenistic period local historiography, as a performative and parenetic medium, afforded citizens of Greek poleis a cautious means of articulating ideologies of independence in the face of foreign kings and empires.
The chapter takes its title from a patriotic retort allegedly delivered by the Herakliote philosopher Chamaileon to Seleucus I in 280 bce, a slogan that served for Nymphis as a founding charter of Herakleian autonomy and local identity in the Black Sea region.
Yet emic expressions of local historiography, like Nymphis’s history, were by and large the prerogative of autonomous Greek communities: histories of poleis that had been conquered by the Macedonian kings or by Rome tended to be written by non-locals, a phenomenon exemplified by the epitomes of the Aristotelian Politeiai published in the middle of the second century bce by the diplomat and scholar Herakleides Lembos.
And when Memnon wrote his own history at the tail end of the Hellenistic period, after Herakleia’s hopes of independence had been decisively extinguished by Roman expansion, he did so with far different aims; the resulting narrative was less an exhortation to local resistance than an exercise in nostalgia.
Related Results
Greek, Tamil and Sanskrit: Comparison between the Myths of Herakles (related with Iole and Deianira) and Rama in Hinduism
Greek, Tamil and Sanskrit: Comparison between the Myths of Herakles (related with Iole and Deianira) and Rama in Hinduism
The Greek Historian Arrian has said that the Indians worshipped Greek Herakles. So the myths related with Greek Herakles need to be compared with the myths of the Indian Gods. Ther...
Laodice (2), Seleucid queen, wife of Antiochus (2) II, c . 285–unknown
Laodice (2), Seleucid queen, wife of Antiochus (2) II, c . 285–unknown
The first wife of the Seleucid king Antiochos II Theos, Laodice, was the daughter of Achaeus the Elder, a Greco-Macedonian local dynast of Asia Minor. She had estates in both Asia ...
Aristotle, Alexander and Seleucus : virtue and legitimacy of Hellenistic kings
Aristotle, Alexander and Seleucus : virtue and legitimacy of Hellenistic kings
This article aims to show an ideological link between the ideas on rulership of the Philosopher Aristotle, king Alexander III. of Macedon and king Seleucus I. of the Seleucid empir...
The Sons of Seleucus ii and the Historicity of Dan 11:10
The Sons of Seleucus ii and the Historicity of Dan 11:10
Dan 11:10 presents textual and historical difficulties. While some scholars favor the Qetiv/og reading of bnw “son”, corresponding to what has been seen as the more historical stat...
Herakles and Eurystheus at Knossos
Herakles and Eurystheus at Knossos
By kind permission of Sir Arthur Evans and of the British School at Athens, I am allowed to publish a marble relief found in 1903 at the Villa Ariadne, near Knossos (pl. III). Heig...
The Splitting of Herakles
The Splitting of Herakles
The Herakles passage in Homer’s Odyssey 11.601–4 has been seen as problematic because it is not one thing: the vision it gives of Herakles’ place in the afterlife is double—his eid...
EL PRIMER TRABAJO DEL HÉROE: HERAKLES DE WERNER HERZOG
EL PRIMER TRABAJO DEL HÉROE: HERAKLES DE WERNER HERZOG
Bavarian filmmaker Werner Herzog’s work has been widely studied; his first short film Herakles (1962), however, has received scarce attention. This paper aims to fill this gap. Aft...
Letter from a Seleucus King to Erophanthus
Letter from a Seleucus King to Erophanthus
This inscription has recently been discovered in Iran. The text contains a letter attributed to a Seleucid king and addressed to an official called Erophanthus. The document, which...

