Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Petrinja earthquake series located and visualised using machine learning

View through CrossRef
Earthquake detection and phase picking are crucial steps in the analysis of earthquakes. With the increasing number of seismic instruments available, large amounts of seismic data are generated, requiring the use of automatic algorithms to process earthquake series and to include events that would not be discovered with manual approaches. The Petrinja earthquake series started with local magnitude ML5.0 earthquake on December 28, 2020, followed by ML6.4 earthquake one day later. In the two years of this earthquake series, human analysts picked a total of 16,000 earthquakes smaller than M2.0, 1528 with magnitudes M2.0-2.9, 156 with magnitudes M3.0-3.9, 17 with magnitudes M4.0-4.9, 2 with magnitudes M5.0-5.9 and one earthquake with magnitude greater than M6.0. While the seismic network at the onset of this sequence counted only a few instruments in the epicentral area, the rapid aftershock deployment of 5 stations in the near vicinity of the fault zone, and the further gradual yet still remarkable growth of the seismic network to more than 50 instruments, produced an extraordinary amount of data, which are perfectly suited for employing machine learning (ML) methods for seismic phase picking and earthquake detection.In this study we present application of various ML methods to the Petrinja earthquake series. We also compare how the results change when we train a model using a subset of data from this earthquake series. Our results show that these machine learning methods are promising approaches for accurately detecting and picking phases in such earthquake series, and also delineate tectonic features responsible for generating them.
Title: The Petrinja earthquake series located and visualised using machine learning
Description:
Earthquake detection and phase picking are crucial steps in the analysis of earthquakes.
With the increasing number of seismic instruments available, large amounts of seismic data are generated, requiring the use of automatic algorithms to process earthquake series and to include events that would not be discovered with manual approaches.
The Petrinja earthquake series started with local magnitude ML5.
0 earthquake on December 28, 2020, followed by ML6.
4 earthquake one day later.
In the two years of this earthquake series, human analysts picked a total of 16,000 earthquakes smaller than M2.
0, 1528 with magnitudes M2.
0-2.
9, 156 with magnitudes M3.
0-3.
9, 17 with magnitudes M4.
0-4.
9, 2 with magnitudes M5.
0-5.
9 and one earthquake with magnitude greater than M6.
While the seismic network at the onset of this sequence counted only a few instruments in the epicentral area, the rapid aftershock deployment of 5 stations in the near vicinity of the fault zone, and the further gradual yet still remarkable growth of the seismic network to more than 50 instruments, produced an extraordinary amount of data, which are perfectly suited for employing machine learning (ML) methods for seismic phase picking and earthquake detection.
In this study we present application of various ML methods to the Petrinja earthquake series.
We also compare how the results change when we train a model using a subset of data from this earthquake series.
Our results show that these machine learning methods are promising approaches for accurately detecting and picking phases in such earthquake series, and also delineate tectonic features responsible for generating them.

Related Results

Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
An up-to-date seismic catalogue of the 2020 Mw6.4 Petrinja (Croatia) earthquake sequence using machine learning
An up-to-date seismic catalogue of the 2020 Mw6.4 Petrinja (Croatia) earthquake sequence using machine learning
Identifying earthquakes and selecting their arrival phases are essential tasks in earthquake analysis. As more seismic instruments become available, they produce vast amounts of se...
Impact and Insights from the 2020 Petrinja Earthquake
Impact and Insights from the 2020 Petrinja Earthquake
The ML 6.2 Petrinja earthquake, which struck on December 29, 2020, is one of the most significant continental earthquakes in central Europe in recent years, following previous majo...
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Abstract –  Objective: To analyze retrospectively 419 patients after the Wenchuan earthquake and 46 after Yushu earthquake with maxillofacial fractures so as to provide reference o...
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Tectonic earthquake swarms exhibit a distinct temporal and spatial pattern compared to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Unlike the latter ones, where the earthquake sequence typical...
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Abstract Consulting the Catalogue of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), for the period 1904–2016 to detect the occurrence of potentially damaging earthquakes we ...
Pattern of strong earthquakes
Pattern of strong earthquakes
Abstract The idea that one earthquake is associated with the occurrence of another earthquake is not new. In this study, we focus our attention on the relationships between...

Back to Top