Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Safety of a standardized bowel preparation protocol for colonoscopy: results of a pilot study

View through CrossRef
Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of a standardized bowel preparation protocol for colonoscopy compared to a traditional regimen. Materials and methods: A single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted in July 2024 at the Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology. Fifty patients with clinical indications for diagnostic colonoscopy were enrolled. The safety and effectiveness of a standardized bowel preparation protocol were evaluated and compared with a retrospective control group of 50 patients who underwent a traditional preparation regimen. Bowel cleanliness was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Safety outcomes were determined based on laboratory test results and the incidence of adverse events (e.g., nausea, vomiting). Results: A significantly higher proportion of patients in the standardized protocol group achieved good or excellent bowel preparation — 47 out of 50 (94.0 %) — compared to 34 out of 50 (68.0 %) in the traditional preparation group (p = 0.002). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups, reported in 14/50 (28.0 %) and 12/50 (24.0 %) patients, respectively (p = 0.8). There were no clinically significant changes in observed laboratory parameters in the standardized group. Conclusion: The standardized bowel preparation protocol demonstrated superior cleansing quality for colonoscopy while maintaining a safety profile comparable to that of the traditional regimen.
Title: Safety of a standardized bowel preparation protocol for colonoscopy: results of a pilot study
Description:
Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of a standardized bowel preparation protocol for colonoscopy compared to a traditional regimen.
Materials and methods: A single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted in July 2024 at the Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology.
Fifty patients with clinical indications for diagnostic colonoscopy were enrolled.
The safety and effectiveness of a standardized bowel preparation protocol were evaluated and compared with a retrospective control group of 50 patients who underwent a traditional preparation regimen.
Bowel cleanliness was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
Safety outcomes were determined based on laboratory test results and the incidence of adverse events (e.
g.
, nausea, vomiting).
Results: A significantly higher proportion of patients in the standardized protocol group achieved good or excellent bowel preparation — 47 out of 50 (94.
0 %) — compared to 34 out of 50 (68.
0 %) in the traditional preparation group (p = 0.
002).
The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups, reported in 14/50 (28.
0 %) and 12/50 (24.
0 %) patients, respectively (p = 0.
8).
There were no clinically significant changes in observed laboratory parameters in the standardized group.
Conclusion: The standardized bowel preparation protocol demonstrated superior cleansing quality for colonoscopy while maintaining a safety profile comparable to that of the traditional regimen.

Related Results

Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing
Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing
AbstractBackgroundThe timing of bowel preparation for colonoscopy influences the quality of bowel cleansing and the success of the procedure.AimWe aimed to determine whether the in...
1175 Ileal Carcinoid Tumors Detected During Screening versus Diagnostic Colonoscopy: Comparison of Tumor Characteristics
1175 Ileal Carcinoid Tumors Detected During Screening versus Diagnostic Colonoscopy: Comparison of Tumor Characteristics
INTRODUCTION: Small intestinal carcinoid tumors are the most common type of small bowel malignancy observed. Most are indolent and incidentally found in asymptomatic pa...
Lactulose vs Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Based on BMI
Lactulose vs Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Based on BMI
INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is currently considered as one of the principal techniques to diagnose the colorectal diseases. Admittedly, qualified bowel preparation before...
Polyethylene glycol‐based bowel preparation before colonoscopy for selected inpatients: A pilot study
Polyethylene glycol‐based bowel preparation before colonoscopy for selected inpatients: A pilot study
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the impact of a new same‐day, low‐dose 1‐L polyethylene glycol‐based (1‐L PEG) bowel preparation on the diagnostic rating of selected hospitalized patients and...
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Abstract: Background: ECF most frequently follows a complication of abdominal surgery, although a smaller number occur spontaneously in association with conditia Background: Entero...
Multiple, zonal and multi‐zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy
Multiple, zonal and multi‐zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy
BackgroundThe safety and diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy depend on the quality of colon cleansing. The adenoma detection rate is usually used as a quality measurement score.Obje...

Back to Top