Javascript must be enabled to continue!
2843 Lack of Knowledge About Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Patients With Biopsy Proven Advanced Colorectal Polyps: A Major Clinical and Medicolegal Challenge
View through CrossRef
INTRODUCTION:
The most recent guidelines from the American College of Gastroenterology recommend that patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps undergo repeat surveillance colonoscopy at a minimum of three years following resection. The rationale is based on rates of recurrence and progression to colorectal cancer. In this report we quantitate the knowledge of patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps about if, and when, they need a repeat colonoscopy.
METHODS:
Methods: Written informed consents were obtained and brief telephone interviews conducted by trained interviewers among 84 patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps. In semi-structured questionnaires that included eleven questions the patients provided self-reports about their awareness of the need to have a repeat colonoscopy as well as the proper surveillance interval.
RESULTS:
Among the 84 patients, who ranged in age from 41-91 years, 24 (28.6%) were unaware of either the need for a repeat colonoscopy or the proper surveillance interval. These included 10 (12.0%) who were not even aware that they required a follow up colonoscopy and 14 (16.6%) who were unaware of the proper three year interval.
CONCLUSION:
Discussion: These data pose medical and legal challenges to clinicians to educate patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps about their need for repeat colonoscopy as well as the proper surveillance interval to reduce their risks of colorectal cancer. Specifically, without proper knowledge of the advanced colorectal polyp three year surveillance protocol, 28.6% of these high risk patients would have forgone or delayed the colonoscopy. With advances in technology and digitized medical records, clinicians may need to rely on a more objective and reproducible centralized database of past colonoscopy findings rather than self-reports. These clinical and medicolegal challenges may also be addressed, at least in part, by automated recalls that ensure there is a safety net to remind patients of their subsequent colonoscopy appointment. The success of these strategies will depend on meticulous attention by the clinician to ensure accurate data pertaining to guideline based appropriate surveillance intervals for colonoscopy. These strategies may also reduce any overutilization of colonoscopies. Of far greater import, the achievement of this goal may reduce morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer in high risk patients with advanced colorectal polyps.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: 2843 Lack of Knowledge About Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Patients With Biopsy Proven Advanced Colorectal Polyps: A Major Clinical and Medicolegal Challenge
Description:
INTRODUCTION:
The most recent guidelines from the American College of Gastroenterology recommend that patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps undergo repeat surveillance colonoscopy at a minimum of three years following resection.
The rationale is based on rates of recurrence and progression to colorectal cancer.
In this report we quantitate the knowledge of patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps about if, and when, they need a repeat colonoscopy.
METHODS:
Methods: Written informed consents were obtained and brief telephone interviews conducted by trained interviewers among 84 patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps.
In semi-structured questionnaires that included eleven questions the patients provided self-reports about their awareness of the need to have a repeat colonoscopy as well as the proper surveillance interval.
RESULTS:
Among the 84 patients, who ranged in age from 41-91 years, 24 (28.
6%) were unaware of either the need for a repeat colonoscopy or the proper surveillance interval.
These included 10 (12.
0%) who were not even aware that they required a follow up colonoscopy and 14 (16.
6%) who were unaware of the proper three year interval.
CONCLUSION:
Discussion: These data pose medical and legal challenges to clinicians to educate patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps about their need for repeat colonoscopy as well as the proper surveillance interval to reduce their risks of colorectal cancer.
Specifically, without proper knowledge of the advanced colorectal polyp three year surveillance protocol, 28.
6% of these high risk patients would have forgone or delayed the colonoscopy.
With advances in technology and digitized medical records, clinicians may need to rely on a more objective and reproducible centralized database of past colonoscopy findings rather than self-reports.
These clinical and medicolegal challenges may also be addressed, at least in part, by automated recalls that ensure there is a safety net to remind patients of their subsequent colonoscopy appointment.
The success of these strategies will depend on meticulous attention by the clinician to ensure accurate data pertaining to guideline based appropriate surveillance intervals for colonoscopy.
These strategies may also reduce any overutilization of colonoscopies.
Of far greater import, the achievement of this goal may reduce morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer in high risk patients with advanced colorectal polyps.
Related Results
G-EYE Colonoscopy Is Superior to Standard Colonoscopy for Increasing Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate
G-EYE Colonoscopy Is Superior to Standard Colonoscopy for Increasing Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate
Abstract
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Most CRCs develop from malignant potent...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Colonoscopic and histopathological assessment of colorectal polyps among north Indian population
Colonoscopic and histopathological assessment of colorectal polyps among north Indian population
Background: Colonic polyps are the abnormal growths from the colonic mucosa, usually benign but there is a definite though a small risk for cancerous transformation. Scarce data ab...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Gastric Polyps: A 10-Year Analysis Of 18496 Upper Endoscopies
Gastric Polyps: A 10-Year Analysis Of 18496 Upper Endoscopies
Abstract
Background/Aims: Gastric polyps (GPs) are usually asymptomatic lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract observed in 1-3% of esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD). ...
558 Accuracy of Endoscopists in Predicting Colorectal Polyps
558 Accuracy of Endoscopists in Predicting Colorectal Polyps
INTRODUCTION:
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for the identification of colorectal cancer and polyps. The majority of colorectal polyps found at screening colonoscopy ...
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy plays an important role in the evaluation of the colon. Many methods for preparing the colon for colonoscopy do not work well. Aim:...
Gastric polyps: a 10-year analysis of 18,496 upper endoscopies
Gastric polyps: a 10-year analysis of 18,496 upper endoscopies
Abstract
Background/aims
Gastric polyps (GPs) are usually asymptomatic lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract observed in 1–3% of esophagogastr...

