Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Elements of Argumentation

View through CrossRef
Background and techniques for formalizing deductive argumentation in a logic-based framework for artificial intelligence. Logic-based formalizations of argumentation, which assume a set of formulae and then lay out arguments and counterarguments that can be obtained from these formulae, have been refined in recent years in an attempt to capture more closely real-world practical argumentation. In Elements of Argumentation, Philippe Besnard and Anthony Hunter introduce techniques for formalizing deductive argumentation in artificial intelligence, emphasizing emerging formalizations for practical argumentation. Besnard and Hunter discuss how arguments can be constructed, how key intrinsic and extrinsic factors can be identified, and how these analyses can be harnessed for formalizing argumentation for use in real-world problem analysis and decision making. The book focuses on a monological approach to argumentation, in which there is a set of possibly conflicting pieces of information (each represented by a formula) that has been collated by an agent or a pool of agents. The role of argumentation is to construct a collection of arguments and counterarguments pertaining to some particular claim of interest to be used for analysis or presentation. Elements of Argumentation is the first book to elucidate and formalize key elements of deductive argumentation. It will be a valuable reference for researchers in computer science and artificial intelligence and of interest to scholars in such fields as logic, philosophy, linguistics, and cognitive science.
Title: Elements of Argumentation
Description:
Background and techniques for formalizing deductive argumentation in a logic-based framework for artificial intelligence.
Logic-based formalizations of argumentation, which assume a set of formulae and then lay out arguments and counterarguments that can be obtained from these formulae, have been refined in recent years in an attempt to capture more closely real-world practical argumentation.
In Elements of Argumentation, Philippe Besnard and Anthony Hunter introduce techniques for formalizing deductive argumentation in artificial intelligence, emphasizing emerging formalizations for practical argumentation.
Besnard and Hunter discuss how arguments can be constructed, how key intrinsic and extrinsic factors can be identified, and how these analyses can be harnessed for formalizing argumentation for use in real-world problem analysis and decision making.
The book focuses on a monological approach to argumentation, in which there is a set of possibly conflicting pieces of information (each represented by a formula) that has been collated by an agent or a pool of agents.
The role of argumentation is to construct a collection of arguments and counterarguments pertaining to some particular claim of interest to be used for analysis or presentation.
Elements of Argumentation is the first book to elucidate and formalize key elements of deductive argumentation.
It will be a valuable reference for researchers in computer science and artificial intelligence and of interest to scholars in such fields as logic, philosophy, linguistics, and cognitive science.

Related Results

Argumentation In Flux (Modelling Change in the Theory of Argumentation)
Argumentation In Flux (Modelling Change in the Theory of Argumentation)
Argumentation In Flux (Modélisation du changement dans la théorie de l'argumentation) Abstract argumentation frameworks are a widely used formalism in the field of ...
PERSUASÃO: o componente pragmático da argumentação
PERSUASÃO: o componente pragmático da argumentação
Spe2 E OliveiraA publicação do Tratado da Argumentação: a nova retórica, em 1958, costuma suscitar, entre os adeptos dos estudos em argumentação, uma aproximação com a retórica de ...
Toward a Theory of Legal Argumentation
Toward a Theory of Legal Argumentation
Abstract This chapter synthesizes some of the key insights from the book’s contributors as a first effort toward building a theory of international legal argumentati...
Argumentation studies and discourse analysis: the French situation and global perspectives
Argumentation studies and discourse analysis: the French situation and global perspectives
This article focuses on the development of argumentation studies in France and their complex relations with discourse analysis. First, the meanings of the basic word `argument' in ...
Critical Political Epistemology of Argumentation
Critical Political Epistemology of Argumentation
Recent years have seen a rising interest in the ethics and moral epistemology of argumentation, fields which normatively study the interpersonal moral behaviour of arguers and its ...
Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning to Increase Concept Mastery and Argumentation Skills
Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning to Increase Concept Mastery and Argumentation Skills
This study aims to increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation of senior high school students in Singkawang City, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. The Physics Argum...
Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey
Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey
Abstract Argumentation and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) are closely related, as in the recent years, Argumentation has been used for providing Explai...
Types of Argumentation in Editorials
Types of Argumentation in Editorials
This article explores argumentation in the genre of editorials. The objective was to determine the frequency of different types of argumentation used in this genre, which can shed ...

Back to Top