Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Equity Pledging by Controlling Shareholders, Executive Incentives, and Corporate Innovation
View through CrossRef
In recent years, equity pledging by controlling shareholders has expanded rapidly as an emerging financing mechanism. Although existing studies document that equity pledging by controlling shareholders undermines corporate innovation, the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently explored. Based on theoretical analysis and empirical evidence, this paper investigates the specific mechanisms and channels through which controlling shareholders’ equity pledges exert negative effects on firms’ innovation activities. We find that, in order to stabilize short-term stock price stability, controlling shareholders increase the proportion of short-term compensation in executive pay following equity pledges, which in return reduces the share of compensation. Given that long-term executive compensation incentives are positively associated with firms’ innovation intensity, weaker long-term compensation incentives lead to a decline in innovation investment. Further analysis reveals that executive incentives partially mediate the relationship between controlling shareholders’ equity pledging and corporate R&D investment. By clarifying the effects and mechanisms through which controlling shareholders’ equity pledging influences corporate innovation, this study contributes to the innovation literature from a theoretical perspective and provides policy implications for external investors, financial institutions, and government agencies, providing new insights into improving t governance in listed firms.
Title: Equity Pledging by Controlling Shareholders, Executive Incentives, and Corporate Innovation
Description:
In recent years, equity pledging by controlling shareholders has expanded rapidly as an emerging financing mechanism.
Although existing studies document that equity pledging by controlling shareholders undermines corporate innovation, the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently explored.
Based on theoretical analysis and empirical evidence, this paper investigates the specific mechanisms and channels through which controlling shareholders’ equity pledges exert negative effects on firms’ innovation activities.
We find that, in order to stabilize short-term stock price stability, controlling shareholders increase the proportion of short-term compensation in executive pay following equity pledges, which in return reduces the share of compensation.
Given that long-term executive compensation incentives are positively associated with firms’ innovation intensity, weaker long-term compensation incentives lead to a decline in innovation investment.
Further analysis reveals that executive incentives partially mediate the relationship between controlling shareholders’ equity pledging and corporate R&D investment.
By clarifying the effects and mechanisms through which controlling shareholders’ equity pledging influences corporate innovation, this study contributes to the innovation literature from a theoretical perspective and provides policy implications for external investors, financial institutions, and government agencies, providing new insights into improving t governance in listed firms.
Related Results
On the Institutional Investor puzzle in pledging firms: Evidence from India
On the Institutional Investor puzzle in pledging firms: Evidence from India
This study examines institutional investor behavior toward pledging firms. It focuses on pledging as a popular yet risky alternative financing source in resource-constrained emergi...
Share pledging by controlling shareholders and accounting conservatism: evidence from India
Share pledging by controlling shareholders and accounting conservatism: evidence from India
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between accounting conservatism and pledging of shares by controlling shareholders of a firm to...
Does executive directors from controlling shareholders improve corporate governance?
Does executive directors from controlling shareholders improve corporate governance?
Purpose
The existence of controlling shareholders creates a remarkable difference between the corporate governance structures of Chinese firms and those of western firms. Despite t...
Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom Company Law
Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom Company Law
It is common that the majority shareholders in a corporation take action that unfairly prejudices the minority. A majority shareholder occupies a dominant position in the decision-...
Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
The purpose of this study is to examine dividend policy on both the controlling and non-controlling shareholders based on assumptions according to theories of life cycle, and free ...
PERAN TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN DALAM MEMODERASI PENGARUH IMPLEMANTASI GREEN ACCOUNTING, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN FIRM SIZE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN
PERAN TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN DALAM MEMODERASI PENGARUH IMPLEMANTASI GREEN ACCOUNTING, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN FIRM SIZE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN
This study examines the role of corporate governance in moderating the influence of green accounting disclosure, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and firm size on the financi...
Executive innovation
Executive innovation
One recent quote for the role of CEOs and other C-Suite executives on the innovation of a firm is: "Innovation executives are not expected to be the innovators, but the great ones ...
Corporate heritage, corporate heritage marketing, and total corporate heritage communications
Corporate heritage, corporate heritage marketing, and total corporate heritage communications
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to advance the general understanding of the corporate heritage domain. The paper seeks to specify the requisites of corpora...

