Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical Outcome of Re-laparotomy
View through CrossRef
Background: Re-laparotomy (RL) is a rare occurrence to treat complication after surgery associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Inappropriate selection of patients for re-laparotomy, those who will not clearly get benefit from surgery can be detrimental. Objective: To observe the post-operative outcomes in terms of post-operative mortality and morbidity following re-laparotomy. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital over a period of 6 months. A total of 41 patients undergone re-laparotomy were selected for the study sample. Data were collected in a pre-designed data collection sheet including particulars of the patients, detailed history, pre- and per-operative findings; surgical procedures and postoperative complications were investigated. Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables. Results: Forty-one patients (mean age 37.9 ± 15.2 years; 63.4% male) underwent re-laparotomy; 28.6% required multiple re-laparotomies. Initial index surgeries comprised bowel resection (34.2%) and perforation repair (24.4%). Indications included new or recurrent perforation (36.6%) and anastomotic leakage (22.0%). Overall mortality was 46.3%, with survival at 53.7%; mortality increased to 100% in patients aged > 64 years (p=0.04). Postoperative ICU admission occurred in 17.1% with mean ICU stay of 5.0 ± 3.0 days. Mean hospital stay was 22.5 ± 18.5 days. Complications included wound infection (26.8%), sepsis (17.1%), burst abdomen (12.2%), pulmonary complication (14.6%), acute kidney injury (4.9%), and DIC (4.9%). Chi-square analysis identified age > 44 (χ²=8.62, p=0.01) and multiple re-laparotomies (χ²=2.45, p=0.12) as predictors. RL incidence: 5.0%. Conclusions: Re-laparotomy is a life-saving procedure, but it has a high mortality rate particularly with increasing age. Re-laparotomy prolongs post-operative hospital stay creating financial burden to patients. Although timely re-laparotomy can save the life, the main focus should be on lowering re-laparotomy rates. The first laparotomy should be done with extreme care.
Title: Clinical Outcome of Re-laparotomy
Description:
Background: Re-laparotomy (RL) is a rare occurrence to treat complication after surgery associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
Inappropriate selection of patients for re-laparotomy, those who will not clearly get benefit from surgery can be detrimental.
Objective: To observe the post-operative outcomes in terms of post-operative mortality and morbidity following re-laparotomy.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital over a period of 6 months.
A total of 41 patients undergone re-laparotomy were selected for the study sample.
Data were collected in a pre-designed data collection sheet including particulars of the patients, detailed history, pre- and per-operative findings; surgical procedures and postoperative complications were investigated.
Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables.
Results: Forty-one patients (mean age 37.
9 ± 15.
2 years; 63.
4% male) underwent re-laparotomy; 28.
6% required multiple re-laparotomies.
Initial index surgeries comprised bowel resection (34.
2%) and perforation repair (24.
4%).
Indications included new or recurrent perforation (36.
6%) and anastomotic leakage (22.
0%).
Overall mortality was 46.
3%, with survival at 53.
7%; mortality increased to 100% in patients aged > 64 years (p=0.
04).
Postoperative ICU admission occurred in 17.
1% with mean ICU stay of 5.
0 ± 3.
0 days.
Mean hospital stay was 22.
5 ± 18.
5 days.
Complications included wound infection (26.
8%), sepsis (17.
1%), burst abdomen (12.
2%), pulmonary complication (14.
6%), acute kidney injury (4.
9%), and DIC (4.
9%).
Chi-square analysis identified age > 44 (χ²=8.
62, p=0.
01) and multiple re-laparotomies (χ²=2.
45, p=0.
12) as predictors.
RL incidence: 5.
0%.
Conclusions: Re-laparotomy is a life-saving procedure, but it has a high mortality rate particularly with increasing age.
Re-laparotomy prolongs post-operative hospital stay creating financial burden to patients.
Although timely re-laparotomy can save the life, the main focus should be on lowering re-laparotomy rates.
The first laparotomy should be done with extreme care.
Related Results
Diagnostic laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma
Diagnostic laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma
BackgroundPenetrating abdominal trauma is uncommon in Australia. There are multiple potential approaches to the patient without an indication for immediate laparotomy. This study e...
Comparison between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in the Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
Comparison between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in the Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
Introduction: Ectopic pregnancy has become one of the most alarming causes of maternal mortality and morbidity and the number of maternal death due to ectopic pregnancy is also in ...
Indications and Outcome of Patients who had Re-Laparotomy: Two Years’ Experience from a Teaching Hospital in a Developing Nation
Indications and Outcome of Patients who had Re-Laparotomy: Two Years’ Experience from a Teaching Hospital in a Developing Nation
BACKGROUND: Complications from abdominal surgery may necessitate a second or more surgeries, re-laparotomy. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Data on relap...
OUTCOME OF MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY WOUND CLOSURE WITH INTERRUPTED X-SUTURE TECHNIQUE VERSUS CONTINUOUS SUTURE TECHNIQUE IN MARDAN MEDICAL COMPLEX
OUTCOME OF MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY WOUND CLOSURE WITH INTERRUPTED X-SUTURE TECHNIQUE VERSUS CONTINUOUS SUTURE TECHNIQUE IN MARDAN MEDICAL COMPLEX
Background: One of the procedures that the general surgery and gynecology departments do most often in emergencycases is laparotomy. Wound closure is one of the key factors influen...
Decision‐Making in the Emergency Laparotomy: A Mixed Methodology Study
Decision‐Making in the Emergency Laparotomy: A Mixed Methodology Study
AbstractIntroductionMore than 30,000 emergency laparotomies take place annually in England and Wales (Symons et al. in Br J Surg 100(10):1318–1325, 2013; Shapter et al. in Anaesthe...
An Observational Study on Complications in Early Postoperative Period after Emergency Laparotomy in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
An Observational Study on Complications in Early Postoperative Period after Emergency Laparotomy in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
BACKGROUND
An emergency laparotomy is a life-saving procedure undertaken mostly in acute conditions without much time for preoperative preparation of the patient. Patients un...
Evaluation of Mesh Closure of Laparotomy and Extraction Incisions in Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Evaluation of Mesh Closure of Laparotomy and Extraction Incisions in Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background and Objectives: Evisceration and incisional hernia (IH) represent a significant morbidity following open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery where midline laparotomy or e...
Laparotomy for Abdominal Injury Indication & Outcome of patients at a Teaching Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Laparotomy for Abdominal Injury Indication & Outcome of patients at a Teaching Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
BACKGROUND: Abdominal injury is among the major causes of trauma admissions. The aim was to determine etiology, commonly injured organs, indication and outcome of patients with abd...

