Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

OUTCOME OF MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY WOUND CLOSURE WITH INTERRUPTED X-SUTURE TECHNIQUE VERSUS CONTINUOUS SUTURE TECHNIQUE IN MARDAN MEDICAL COMPLEX

View through CrossRef
Background: One of the procedures that the general surgery and gynecology departments do most often in emergencycases is laparotomy. Wound closure is one of the key factors influencing how well this procedure works. While somesurgeons choose interrupted closure techniques, others favor continuous closure of the linea alba.Objective: to evaluate the results of laparotomy wound closure in midline laparotomy patients using the interruptedX-suture method versus the continuous suture technique.Study design: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Duration and place of study : Medical Complex’s Department of General Surgery and Gynaecological participated in this randomized controlled trial. This study covered January 2018–December 2019Materials & Methods: Adult emergency midline laparotomy patients at Mardan Medical Complex’s Departmentof General Surgery and Gynaecological participated in this randomized controlled trial. This study covered January2018–December 2019. Two hundred patients were studied. They were randomly divided into two groups. Thesepatients had their abdominal incisions sealed with continuous sutures. People in Group II had interrupted X-suturesto close their abdominal wounds. Patients were evaluated daily for difficulties in the first week and after two weeks.Results: Group I’s mean age was 43.8±8.7 years, whereas Group II’s was 42.6±10.9 years (p-value = 0.39).In group I, there were 77% of male patients, while in group II, there were 74% (p-value 0.74). The most prevalentetiology was peritonitis caused by a gut perforation, accounting for 63% of cases in group I and 68% in group II(p-value = 0.55). 9.5% of patients in group I and 3.5% of patients in group II were diagnosed with laparotomywound dehiscence (p-value 0.006). Regarding other issues, no statistically significant difference was seen.Conclusion: After an emergency midline laparotomy, the interrupted suture method (X-suture) is superior to thecontinuous suture technique for closing the abdominal wall. The interrupted X-suture procedure has considerablyreduced the incidence of wound dehiscence.Keywords: Acute abdomen, peritonitis, gut perforation, emergency midline laparotomy, and laparotomy wounddehiscence.
Title: OUTCOME OF MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY WOUND CLOSURE WITH INTERRUPTED X-SUTURE TECHNIQUE VERSUS CONTINUOUS SUTURE TECHNIQUE IN MARDAN MEDICAL COMPLEX
Description:
Background: One of the procedures that the general surgery and gynecology departments do most often in emergencycases is laparotomy.
Wound closure is one of the key factors influencing how well this procedure works.
While somesurgeons choose interrupted closure techniques, others favor continuous closure of the linea alba.
Objective: to evaluate the results of laparotomy wound closure in midline laparotomy patients using the interruptedX-suture method versus the continuous suture technique.
Study design: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Duration and place of study : Medical Complex’s Department of General Surgery and Gynaecological participated in this randomized controlled trial.
This study covered January 2018–December 2019Materials & Methods: Adult emergency midline laparotomy patients at Mardan Medical Complex’s Departmentof General Surgery and Gynaecological participated in this randomized controlled trial.
This study covered January2018–December 2019.
Two hundred patients were studied.
They were randomly divided into two groups.
Thesepatients had their abdominal incisions sealed with continuous sutures.
People in Group II had interrupted X-suturesto close their abdominal wounds.
Patients were evaluated daily for difficulties in the first week and after two weeks.
Results: Group I’s mean age was 43.
8±8.
7 years, whereas Group II’s was 42.
6±10.
9 years (p-value = 0.
39).
In group I, there were 77% of male patients, while in group II, there were 74% (p-value 0.
74).
The most prevalentetiology was peritonitis caused by a gut perforation, accounting for 63% of cases in group I and 68% in group II(p-value = 0.
55).
9.
5% of patients in group I and 3.
5% of patients in group II were diagnosed with laparotomywound dehiscence (p-value 0.
006).
Regarding other issues, no statistically significant difference was seen.
Conclusion: After an emergency midline laparotomy, the interrupted suture method (X-suture) is superior to thecontinuous suture technique for closing the abdominal wall.
The interrupted X-suture procedure has considerablyreduced the incidence of wound dehiscence.
Keywords: Acute abdomen, peritonitis, gut perforation, emergency midline laparotomy, and laparotomy wounddehiscence.

Related Results

Effectiveness of Continuous versus Interrupted Closure of Midline Wound in Emergency Laparotomies in Terms of Wound Dehiscence
Effectiveness of Continuous versus Interrupted Closure of Midline Wound in Emergency Laparotomies in Terms of Wound Dehiscence
Background: Midline laparotomy is widely recognized as the preferred technique for abdominal surgeries due to its simplicity and the effective exposure it provides. Despite its pre...
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Suture is an underreported cause for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) that can cause significant morbidity. This report describes a case of TOA arising from a silk ...
A STUDY ON LAYERED CLOSURE VERSUS MASS CLOSURE OF LAPAROTOMY INCISIONS
A STUDY ON LAYERED CLOSURE VERSUS MASS CLOSURE OF LAPAROTOMY INCISIONS
Background: The ideal method of abdominal wound closure remains to be discovered. It should be technically so simple that the results are as good in the hands of a trainee as in th...
Herringbone stitch technique versus interrupted suturing technique for rectus closure in emergency laparotomy: A comparative study
Herringbone stitch technique versus interrupted suturing technique for rectus closure in emergency laparotomy: A comparative study
Background: Midline laparotomy incisions provide easy and rapid access to the peritoneal cavity in case of emergency surgery and effective closure of the abdominal wall is crucial ...
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recove...
Effect of Various Ancillary Operating Room Techniques on Wound Healing Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Effect of Various Ancillary Operating Room Techniques on Wound Healing Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Introduction: The successful management of wound healing after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on several aspects of ancillary intraoperative techniques and surgical variable...
Role of Subcutaneous Negative Suction versus Simple Subcutaneous Drain Closure in Contaminated Abdominal Surgeries in Pediatric Age Group
Role of Subcutaneous Negative Suction versus Simple Subcutaneous Drain Closure in Contaminated Abdominal Surgeries in Pediatric Age Group
Introduction: Contaminated abdominal surgical laparotomy incisions and their care are basic principles in the field of surgery. In emergency or trauma laparotomy, the primary surge...

Back to Top