Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Copyright in the Contemporary Circus Art
View through CrossRef
The article is dedicated to the research of the problems of obtaining and protecting copyright in the circus industry, the problem of plagiarism in circus art, and the problem of professionalism in the circus performing arts. In Ukraine there is no special Law on Circuses. Because of that there are some difficulties with the application of the Law on Copyright to Circus Arts, in particular to the original stunts, acts and show programs created by circus performers and directors. In the EU, copyright issue is also an important factor for circus artists.
The circus performer as a creator of the original act needs legal protection of an individual artistic creation, but it is very difficult to prove and legally justify the individual features of a certain stunt in the circus art. Another performer may bring some small changes to the same trick, and declare it as his original one, and even prove that it differs from the one created by another artist. In the Circus Art, the reproduction and copying of stunts is more in the field of ethics than of legal issues. There is no obvious and quick solution of this problem today.
Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine
Title: Copyright in the Contemporary Circus Art
Description:
The article is dedicated to the research of the problems of obtaining and protecting copyright in the circus industry, the problem of plagiarism in circus art, and the problem of professionalism in the circus performing arts.
In Ukraine there is no special Law on Circuses.
Because of that there are some difficulties with the application of the Law on Copyright to Circus Arts, in particular to the original stunts, acts and show programs created by circus performers and directors.
In the EU, copyright issue is also an important factor for circus artists.
The circus performer as a creator of the original act needs legal protection of an individual artistic creation, but it is very difficult to prove and legally justify the individual features of a certain stunt in the circus art.
Another performer may bring some small changes to the same trick, and declare it as his original one, and even prove that it differs from the one created by another artist.
In the Circus Art, the reproduction and copying of stunts is more in the field of ethics than of legal issues.
There is no obvious and quick solution of this problem today.
Related Results
CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCIENCE OF “CIRCOLOGY” IN CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN ART CRITICISM: A STUDY OF THE SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL AND ARTISTIC EXAMPLES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CIRCUS GENRES AT THE KYIV MUNICIPAL ACADEMY OF CIRCUS AND PERFORMING ARTS
CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCIENCE OF “CIRCOLOGY” IN CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN ART CRITICISM: A STUDY OF THE SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL AND ARTISTIC EXAMPLES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CIRCUS GENRES AT THE KYIV MUNICIPAL ACADEMY OF CIRCUS AND PERFORMING ARTS
The topic of the research is devoted to the creation and development of the science of “Circology” in contemporary Ukrainian art criticism. Its phenomenon, definition, goals, objec...
SYSTEMATIC TRAINING OF PROFESSIONAL CIRCUS ARTISTSБ (ACROBATS-VOLTIGERS AND AIR GYMNASTS ON THE CORDE-DE-PÉRIL) IN THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION OF ART SPHERE
SYSTEMATIC TRAINING OF PROFESSIONAL CIRCUS ARTISTSБ (ACROBATS-VOLTIGERS AND AIR GYMNASTS ON THE CORDE-DE-PÉRIL) IN THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION OF ART SPHERE
The article outlines the possibility of a systematic principle of training a circus artist in today's conditions.
The purpose of the study is to systematically review the training...
<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
This case turns on whether the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in <i>Sony</i> conclusively resolves at the summary judgment stage the present dispute – involving striking...
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
The aim of this paper is to investigate and present concepts of the author and his/her copyright work in copyright legislation that entered into force in Croatia from 1846 to 2007....
Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy
Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy
As copyright issues have moved towards the forefront of popular culture, trade, and the Supreme Court docket, we have lost sight of the first principles framed copyright’s developm...
Show “Ovo” of Cirque du Soleil: comparative analyzis of a circus performance and its stage demonstration (scenario, decorations, music, circus genres and characters)
Show “Ovo” of Cirque du Soleil: comparative analyzis of a circus performance and its stage demonstration (scenario, decorations, music, circus genres and characters)
The article will carry out an artistic analysis in the context of circology, namely: comparative and artistic analysis of the show “OVO” of the “Cirque du Soleil”. Research in the ...
The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957
The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957
This article analyzes the process of institutionalization of the Bulgarian circus be-tween 1944 and 1957. The appreciation of circus as “an equal member of the large family of soci...
Copyright Backlash
Copyright Backlash
In the past decade the entertainment industry has waged a legally very successful campaign against online copyright infringements. In a series of high profile decisions, content in...

