Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Addition of Suture Tape to the Hamstring Graft Construct Does Not Reduce Instrumented Knee Laxity Following ACL Reconstruction
View through CrossRef
Purpose
To establish the effect of the addition of suture tape to the hamstring graft construct through measurement of instrumented sagittal plane knee laxity at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods
A retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of primary ACLR performed between May 2017 and June 2019. Patients with concomitant or historic contralateral knee injury were excluded. Suture tape was included in the graft construct from the midpoint of the study period (May 2018). Sagittal plane knee laxity was quantified using the KT2000 arthrometer at 6 postoperative months. Mean side‐to‐side differences in sagittal plane laxity between the operated and contralateral, uninjured knees were compared for grafts with and without suture tape. Additional outcomes included comparison between suture tape application techniques (graft reinforcement versus augmentation), comparison between suture tape with and without iliotibial band (ITB) tenodesis and documentation of complications necessitating further surgery.
Results
A total of 169 patients were eligible for inclusion. Seventy‐two grafts included suture tape and 84 patients underwent concomitant ITB tenodesis. There was no significant difference in mean laxity between grafts containing suture tape (mean difference: 1.2 mm, SD: 2.6 mm) and those without (mean difference: 1.3 mm, SD: 2.1 mm),
P
= .83 (CI −.92 to 1.13). Neither were there significant differences in laxity when using suture tape with concomitant ITB tenodesis (mean difference: 1.1 mm, SD: 2.1 mm),
P
= .75 (CI −.79 to 1.09), or when comparing techniques: graft reinforcement (mean difference .9 mm, SD 2.6 mm); graft augmentation (mean difference: 1.5 mm, SD: 2.5 mm)
P
= .52 (CI −2.29 to 1.16). There were no complications associated with suture tape.
Conclusions
The addition of suture tape to an autologous hamstring graft construct did not reduce instrumented sagittal knee laxity in the first 6 months after ACL reconstruction. As such, the clinical relevance of its use remains unknown.
Level of Evidence
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Title: The Addition of Suture Tape to the Hamstring Graft Construct Does Not Reduce Instrumented Knee Laxity Following ACL Reconstruction
Description:
Purpose
To establish the effect of the addition of suture tape to the hamstring graft construct through measurement of instrumented sagittal plane knee laxity at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods
A retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of primary ACLR performed between May 2017 and June 2019.
Patients with concomitant or historic contralateral knee injury were excluded.
Suture tape was included in the graft construct from the midpoint of the study period (May 2018).
Sagittal plane knee laxity was quantified using the KT2000 arthrometer at 6 postoperative months.
Mean side‐to‐side differences in sagittal plane laxity between the operated and contralateral, uninjured knees were compared for grafts with and without suture tape.
Additional outcomes included comparison between suture tape application techniques (graft reinforcement versus augmentation), comparison between suture tape with and without iliotibial band (ITB) tenodesis and documentation of complications necessitating further surgery.
Results
A total of 169 patients were eligible for inclusion.
Seventy‐two grafts included suture tape and 84 patients underwent concomitant ITB tenodesis.
There was no significant difference in mean laxity between grafts containing suture tape (mean difference: 1.
2 mm, SD: 2.
6 mm) and those without (mean difference: 1.
3 mm, SD: 2.
1 mm),
P
= .
83 (CI −.
92 to 1.
13).
Neither were there significant differences in laxity when using suture tape with concomitant ITB tenodesis (mean difference: 1.
1 mm, SD: 2.
1 mm),
P
= .
75 (CI −.
79 to 1.
09), or when comparing techniques: graft reinforcement (mean difference .
9 mm, SD 2.
6 mm); graft augmentation (mean difference: 1.
5 mm, SD: 2.
5 mm)
P
= .
52 (CI −2.
29 to 1.
16).
There were no complications associated with suture tape.
Conclusions
The addition of suture tape to an autologous hamstring graft construct did not reduce instrumented sagittal knee laxity in the first 6 months after ACL reconstruction.
As such, the clinical relevance of its use remains unknown.
Level of Evidence
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Related Results
Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Objectives:
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the 6th most common orthopedic procedure performed in the United States (1,2). There is substanti...
The Clinical and Functional Outcome of Peroneus Longus Graft in Comparison to Hamstring Graft in Arthroscopic Repair of Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
The Clinical and Functional Outcome of Peroneus Longus Graft in Comparison to Hamstring Graft in Arthroscopic Repair of Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
Background And Objective: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been recognized as the standard treatment to restore knee stability and joint function after an ACL r...
Short graft, short tunnel ACL reconstruction with single hamstring and internal brace leads to comparable outcomes to conventional double hamstring technique: A retrospective study
Short graft, short tunnel ACL reconstruction with single hamstring and internal brace leads to comparable outcomes to conventional double hamstring technique: A retrospective study
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of our study was to compare (1) ACL graft healing, (2) patient‐reported outcome, and (3) com...
Peroneus Longus Tendon Harvesting for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Peroneus Longus Tendon Harvesting for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Background:
There remains controversy regarding the ideal graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction
...
Patellar Tendon Quality and Knee Symptoms in Male Athletes Before the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Patellar Tendon Quality and Knee Symptoms in Male Athletes Before the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Abstract
Background: It is unknown if the quality of the patellar tendon is affected by an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. ACL deficient patients (ACL-D) have show...
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose
ACL deficiency may cause abnormal knee kinematics and is associated with a tenfold increase in surgical ...
Outcome analysis of Adjustable Loop Device for ACL femoral fixation
Outcome analysis of Adjustable Loop Device for ACL femoral fixation
Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is commonly performed to restore knee stability after ACL rupture. Femoral graft fixation remains a critical fact...
Meniscal Preservation is More Likely When Performed with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Rather Than with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Meniscal Preservation is More Likely When Performed with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Rather Than with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Introduction: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) often occurs in conjunction with meniscal tears. In this study, we investigate the rates and outcomes of meniscal repa...

