Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Subjective knee apprehension is not associated to physical parameters 6–12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
View through CrossRef
AbstractPurposeAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury and psychological parameters measured at 6–8 months are said to be almost more predictive for return to sport (RTS) than physiological. Purpose was 1) to evaluate the correlation between knee apprehension using ACL‐RSI and physical factors after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), 2) to assess the correlation between ACL‐RSI and patient parameters (age, pivot‐sport, BMI), and 3) to evaluate ACL‐RSI over time.MethodsPatients with ACLR with or without meniscal repair between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Including criteria were RTS testing battery, assessed at least 6 months after surgery, including physical parameters (strength, triple hop test, side hop test, and bilateral knee stability) and psychological parameters (ACL‐RSI). 5 subgroups were analyzed to assessed factors such as age, BMI, pivot sport, time interval between two RTS testing battery.ResultsThree hundred three patients (212 male, 91 female) presenting ACLR were included. Mean age at surgery was 27 (± 8) years. 258 patients practiced pivot‐sport activity and 45 non‐pivot‐sport activity. The mean interval between ACL rupture and surgery was 6.5 (± 4.5) months. RTS testing battery were performed at 8 (± 7) months after ACLR.Mean ACL‐RSI was 58 (± 28). 1) ACL‐RSI was not influenced by muscle strength, coordination and stability of the knee. 2) ACL‐RSI was significantly better in lower BMI and non‐pivot‐sport activities. No correlation was found between graft type, age, sex, and ACL‐RSI assessment. 3) For patients who performed two RTS testing battery at 8 and 12 months, ACL‐RSI did not significantly increase over time (56 to 64 points, p = 0.22) in spite of significant increased quadriceps (127 to 151 Nm/kg, p = 0.005) and hamstring (93 to 105 Nm/kg, p = 0.05) strength.ConclusionsPsychological readiness before RTS, measured upon ACL‐RSI does not correlate with any physical parameter at 8–12 months postoperatively. Although quadriceps and hamstring strength increased significantly over time, ACL‐RSI does not and must therefore be routinely assessed.
Title: Subjective knee apprehension is not associated to physical parameters 6–12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Description:
AbstractPurposeAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury and psychological parameters measured at 6–8 months are said to be almost more predictive for return to sport (RTS) than physiological.
Purpose was 1) to evaluate the correlation between knee apprehension using ACL‐RSI and physical factors after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), 2) to assess the correlation between ACL‐RSI and patient parameters (age, pivot‐sport, BMI), and 3) to evaluate ACL‐RSI over time.
MethodsPatients with ACLR with or without meniscal repair between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
Including criteria were RTS testing battery, assessed at least 6 months after surgery, including physical parameters (strength, triple hop test, side hop test, and bilateral knee stability) and psychological parameters (ACL‐RSI).
5 subgroups were analyzed to assessed factors such as age, BMI, pivot sport, time interval between two RTS testing battery.
ResultsThree hundred three patients (212 male, 91 female) presenting ACLR were included.
Mean age at surgery was 27 (± 8) years.
258 patients practiced pivot‐sport activity and 45 non‐pivot‐sport activity.
The mean interval between ACL rupture and surgery was 6.
5 (± 4.
5) months.
RTS testing battery were performed at 8 (± 7) months after ACLR.
Mean ACL‐RSI was 58 (± 28).
1) ACL‐RSI was not influenced by muscle strength, coordination and stability of the knee.
2) ACL‐RSI was significantly better in lower BMI and non‐pivot‐sport activities.
No correlation was found between graft type, age, sex, and ACL‐RSI assessment.
3) For patients who performed two RTS testing battery at 8 and 12 months, ACL‐RSI did not significantly increase over time (56 to 64 points, p = 0.
22) in spite of significant increased quadriceps (127 to 151 Nm/kg, p = 0.
005) and hamstring (93 to 105 Nm/kg, p = 0.
05) strength.
ConclusionsPsychological readiness before RTS, measured upon ACL‐RSI does not correlate with any physical parameter at 8–12 months postoperatively.
Although quadriceps and hamstring strength increased significantly over time, ACL‐RSI does not and must therefore be routinely assessed.
Related Results
The Effects of Knee Reconstruction on Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Capsular Deficiencies
The Effects of Knee Reconstruction on Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Capsular Deficiencies
We tested the effect of intraarticular reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament alone and in combination with extraarticular reconstructions in 10 cadaveric knees. These k...
Functional Evaluation of the Knee in Athletes and Sportsmen Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
Functional Evaluation of the Knee in Athletes and Sportsmen Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
The knee is a joint made up of bones, muscles, ligaments and cartilage. The anterior cruciate ligament is a fundamental part for the proper functioning of the knee, being responsib...
The double fascicular variations of the anterior talofibular ligament and the calcaneofibular ligament correlate with interconnections between lateral ankle structures revealed on magnetic resonance imaging
The double fascicular variations of the anterior talofibular ligament and the calcaneofibular ligament correlate with interconnections between lateral ankle structures revealed on magnetic resonance imaging
AbstractThe anterior talofibular ligament and the calcaneofibular ligament are the most commonly injured ankle ligaments. This study aimed to investigate if the double fascicular a...
ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT, DESCRIPTION, RUPTURE AND TREATMENT
ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT, DESCRIPTION, RUPTURE AND TREATMENT
Introduction: the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) along with the posterior cruciate ligament are the central stabilizers of the knee. Rupture of the ACL usually occurs in active a...
Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Anatomy and Biomechanics
Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Anatomy and Biomechanics
Abstract The Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a unique structure and one of the most important ligaments for knee stability, serving as primary restriction for the anterior tibi...
Physiotherapy treatment and rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury in New Zealand: Are we doing enough?
Physiotherapy treatment and rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury in New Zealand: Are we doing enough?
Physiotherapists are lead providers of rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury in New Zealand. Rehabilitation is considered an essential component following ante...
Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Background:
Medial meniscal ramp lesions are disruptions at the meniscocapsular junction and/or meniscotibial attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, a...
Correlation of Graft Maturity with Knee Function Scores Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study
Correlation of Graft Maturity with Knee Function Scores Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the signal/noise quotient value and knee function scores has not been extensively studied. Thus, we aimed to investigate the c...

