Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Addition of Suture Tape to the Hamstring Graft Construct Does Not Reduce Instrumented Knee Laxity Following ACL Reconstruction

View through CrossRef
Purpose To establish the effect of the addition of suture tape to the hamstring graft construct through measurement of instrumented sagittal plane knee laxity at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of primary ACLR performed between May 2017 and June 2019. Patients with concomitant or historic contralateral knee injury were excluded. Suture tape was included in the graft construct from the midpoint of the study period (May 2018). Sagittal plane knee laxity was quantified using the KT2000 arthrometer at 6 postoperative months. Mean side‐to‐side differences in sagittal plane laxity between the operated and contralateral, uninjured knees were compared for grafts with and without suture tape. Additional outcomes included comparison between suture tape application techniques (graft reinforcement versus augmentation), comparison between suture tape with and without iliotibial band (ITB) tenodesis and documentation of complications necessitating further surgery. Results A total of 169 patients were eligible for inclusion. Seventy‐two grafts included suture tape and 84 patients underwent concomitant ITB tenodesis. There was no significant difference in mean laxity between grafts containing suture tape (mean difference: 1.2 mm, SD: 2.6 mm) and those without (mean difference: 1.3 mm, SD: 2.1 mm), P  = .83 (CI −.92 to 1.13). Neither were there significant differences in laxity when using suture tape with concomitant ITB tenodesis (mean difference: 1.1 mm, SD: 2.1 mm), P  = .75 (CI −.79 to 1.09), or when comparing techniques: graft reinforcement (mean difference .9 mm, SD 2.6 mm); graft augmentation (mean difference: 1.5 mm, SD: 2.5 mm) P  = .52 (CI −2.29 to 1.16). There were no complications associated with suture tape. Conclusions The addition of suture tape to an autologous hamstring graft construct did not reduce instrumented sagittal knee laxity in the first 6 months after ACL reconstruction. As such, the clinical relevance of its use remains unknown. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Title: The Addition of Suture Tape to the Hamstring Graft Construct Does Not Reduce Instrumented Knee Laxity Following ACL Reconstruction
Description:
Purpose To establish the effect of the addition of suture tape to the hamstring graft construct through measurement of instrumented sagittal plane knee laxity at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of primary ACLR performed between May 2017 and June 2019.
Patients with concomitant or historic contralateral knee injury were excluded.
Suture tape was included in the graft construct from the midpoint of the study period (May 2018).
Sagittal plane knee laxity was quantified using the KT2000 arthrometer at 6 postoperative months.
Mean side‐to‐side differences in sagittal plane laxity between the operated and contralateral, uninjured knees were compared for grafts with and without suture tape.
Additional outcomes included comparison between suture tape application techniques (graft reinforcement versus augmentation), comparison between suture tape with and without iliotibial band (ITB) tenodesis and documentation of complications necessitating further surgery.
Results A total of 169 patients were eligible for inclusion.
Seventy‐two grafts included suture tape and 84 patients underwent concomitant ITB tenodesis.
There was no significant difference in mean laxity between grafts containing suture tape (mean difference: 1.
2 mm, SD: 2.
6 mm) and those without (mean difference: 1.
3 mm, SD: 2.
1 mm), P  = .
83 (CI −.
92 to 1.
13).
Neither were there significant differences in laxity when using suture tape with concomitant ITB tenodesis (mean difference: 1.
1 mm, SD: 2.
1 mm), P  = .
75 (CI −.
79 to 1.
09), or when comparing techniques: graft reinforcement (mean difference .
9 mm, SD 2.
6 mm); graft augmentation (mean difference: 1.
5 mm, SD: 2.
5 mm) P  = .
52 (CI −2.
29 to 1.
16).
There were no complications associated with suture tape.
Conclusions The addition of suture tape to an autologous hamstring graft construct did not reduce instrumented sagittal knee laxity in the first 6 months after ACL reconstruction.
As such, the clinical relevance of its use remains unknown.
Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Related Results

Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the 6th most common orthopedic procedure performed in the United States (1,2). There is substantial evidence to sugge...
Subjective knee apprehension is not associated to physical parameters 6–12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Subjective knee apprehension is not associated to physical parameters 6–12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
AbstractPurposeAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury and psychological parameters measured at 6–8 months are said to be almost more predictive for return to s...
Artelon Graft Augmentation in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report
Artelon Graft Augmentation in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report
Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are becoming more common in the United States. These commonly present following a non-contact twisting injury to the knee wit...
Functional outcomes of ACL reconstruction using hamstring auto graft.
Functional outcomes of ACL reconstruction using hamstring auto graft.
Objectives: The knee joint is made of two cruciate ligaments. One is anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) which is weaker when it comes to comparison with the other cruciate ligament k...
Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Background: Medial meniscal ramp lesions are disruptions at the meniscocapsular junction and/or meniscotibial attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, a...
The Role of the Nordic Hamstring Curl in the Rehabilitation of Hamstring Injuries: A Narrative Review
The Role of the Nordic Hamstring Curl in the Rehabilitation of Hamstring Injuries: A Narrative Review
Background: Hamstring injuries are common in sports requiring high speed and power, such as soccer, football, and field. Prevention and rehabilitation strategies are essential to a...
A STUDY OF THE OUTCOME OF “LIGAMENT CROISE ANTERIEUR" (ACL) RECONSTRUCTION USING AUTOLOGOUS HAMSTRING GRAFT
A STUDY OF THE OUTCOME OF “LIGAMENT CROISE ANTERIEUR" (ACL) RECONSTRUCTION USING AUTOLOGOUS HAMSTRING GRAFT
ACL injury is a widely recognized injury affecting the Genu-Joint Male to female ratio of “L ” injuries are, igament Croise Anterieur (ACL) as high as 9 :1 igament Croise Anterieur...

Back to Top