Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
View through CrossRef
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contributors). Although there is some evidence that has explored the efficiency and effectiveness of funding committees in terms of the funding process, there is a lack of published evidence about the purpose, role, and function of funding committees, from the perspective of committee members. A subset of survey data from a cohort of six National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) research programmes, exploring the purpose of a funding committee, and the expectations and role of a funding committee member between October 2020 to December 2021. All committee members were eligible to participate in the survey. Using an inductive approach, 50 completed responses (22.5% response rate) were analysed, focusing on the role of a funding committee member and the functions of a funding committee. Participants highlighted seven key areas for the purpose of a funding committee: prioritising and recommending what research to fund (n=36) and assessment of quality (n=24) being the most common responses. Four areas were considered important to the expectations and role of funding committee members, with reviewing, critically appraising, and discussing applications (n=44); and being fair, objective, and unbiased (n=27) being the most common responses. The findings offer a unique insight into committee members’ expectations about the role, purpose and function of a funding committee and their contribution to the funding recommendation process. There was high agreement that the purpose and role of committees and their members was to offer expert advice to make fair, impartial decisions on which research should be prioritised. Exploring the purpose, role, and function of funding committees has relevance and importance for funding organisations seeking to enhance and optimise the decision-making practice of funding committees.
Title: Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Description:
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.
g.
, professional, and public contributors).
Although there is some evidence that has explored the efficiency and effectiveness of funding committees in terms of the funding process, there is a lack of published evidence about the purpose, role, and function of funding committees, from the perspective of committee members.
A subset of survey data from a cohort of six National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) research programmes, exploring the purpose of a funding committee, and the expectations and role of a funding committee member between October 2020 to December 2021.
All committee members were eligible to participate in the survey.
Using an inductive approach, 50 completed responses (22.
5% response rate) were analysed, focusing on the role of a funding committee member and the functions of a funding committee.
Participants highlighted seven key areas for the purpose of a funding committee: prioritising and recommending what research to fund (n=36) and assessment of quality (n=24) being the most common responses.
Four areas were considered important to the expectations and role of funding committee members, with reviewing, critically appraising, and discussing applications (n=44); and being fair, objective, and unbiased (n=27) being the most common responses.
The findings offer a unique insight into committee members’ expectations about the role, purpose and function of a funding committee and their contribution to the funding recommendation process.
There was high agreement that the purpose and role of committees and their members was to offer expert advice to make fair, impartial decisions on which research should be prioritised.
Exploring the purpose, role, and function of funding committees has relevance and importance for funding organisations seeking to enhance and optimise the decision-making practice of funding committees.
Related Results
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contrib...
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contrib...
A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose
A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose
Abstract
Background
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive, debilitating symptoms that ...
Dynamics of Mutations in Patients with ET Treated with Imetelstat
Dynamics of Mutations in Patients with ET Treated with Imetelstat
Abstract
Background: Imetelstat, a first in class specific telomerase inhibitor, induced hematologic responses in all patients (pts) with essential thrombocythemia (...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Development and Exploitation of a Fully Human and Modular Organotypic Bone Marrow Niche Model to Study the Role of Stroma-Produced Factors in Human MDS
Development and Exploitation of a Fully Human and Modular Organotypic Bone Marrow Niche Model to Study the Role of Stroma-Produced Factors in Human MDS
Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of stem cell driven disorders primarily affecting the elderly and characterized by inefficient production of ma...
Combinatorial Antigen Targeting Strategy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Combinatorial Antigen Targeting Strategy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Introduction: Efforts to safely and effectively treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by targeting a single leukemia associated antigen with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells ...
Improving the Quality of the External Audit and Their Role in the Audit Committees
Improving the Quality of the External Audit and Their Role in the Audit Committees
The study reviews committees and their role in improving the external audit quality through examining a case study of Sudanese banks. The study problem can be formulated from the f...

