Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
View through CrossRef
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contributors). Although there is some evidence that has explored the efficiency and effectiveness of funding committees in terms of the funding process, there is a lack of published evidence about the purpose, role, and function of funding committees, from the perspective of committee members. A subset of survey data from a cohort of six National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) research programmes, exploring the purpose of a funding committee, and the expectations and role of a funding committee member between October 2020 to December 2021. All committee members were eligible to participate in the survey. Using an inductive approach, 50 completed responses (22.5% response rate) were analysed, focusing on the role of a funding committee member and the functions of a funding committee. Participants highlighted seven key areas for the purpose of a funding committee: prioritising and recommending what research to fund (n=36) and assessment of quality (n=24) being the most common responses. Four areas were considered important to the expectations and role of funding committee members, with reviewing, critically appraising, and discussing applications (n=44); and being fair, objective, and unbiased (n=27) being the most common responses. The findings offer a unique insight into committee members’ expectations about the role, purpose and function of a funding committee and their contribution to the funding recommendation process. There was high agreement that the purpose and role of committees and their members was to offer expert advice to make fair, impartial decisions on which research should be prioritised. Exploring the purpose, role, and function of funding committees has relevance and importance for funding organisations seeking to enhance and optimise the decision-making practice of funding committees.
Title: Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Description:
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.
g.
, professional, and public contributors).
Although there is some evidence that has explored the efficiency and effectiveness of funding committees in terms of the funding process, there is a lack of published evidence about the purpose, role, and function of funding committees, from the perspective of committee members.
A subset of survey data from a cohort of six National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) research programmes, exploring the purpose of a funding committee, and the expectations and role of a funding committee member between October 2020 to December 2021.
All committee members were eligible to participate in the survey.
Using an inductive approach, 50 completed responses (22.
5% response rate) were analysed, focusing on the role of a funding committee member and the functions of a funding committee.
Participants highlighted seven key areas for the purpose of a funding committee: prioritising and recommending what research to fund (n=36) and assessment of quality (n=24) being the most common responses.
Four areas were considered important to the expectations and role of funding committee members, with reviewing, critically appraising, and discussing applications (n=44); and being fair, objective, and unbiased (n=27) being the most common responses.
The findings offer a unique insight into committee members’ expectations about the role, purpose and function of a funding committee and their contribution to the funding recommendation process.
There was high agreement that the purpose and role of committees and their members was to offer expert advice to make fair, impartial decisions on which research should be prioritised.
Exploring the purpose, role, and function of funding committees has relevance and importance for funding organisations seeking to enhance and optimise the decision-making practice of funding committees.
Related Results
Outcomes of Transplant-Eligible Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts Registered in a Prospective Observational Study: The JALSG-CS11-MDS-SCT
Outcomes of Transplant-Eligible Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts Registered in a Prospective Observational Study: The JALSG-CS11-MDS-SCT
Abstract
Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Several studie...
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contrib...
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process, consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (e.g., professional, and public contrib...
Efficacy of an Extended Half-Life GlycoPEGylated rFVIII (N8-GP): Pooled Analysis of ABR (Results from Two Clinical Trials)
Efficacy of an Extended Half-Life GlycoPEGylated rFVIII (N8-GP): Pooled Analysis of ABR (Results from Two Clinical Trials)
Abstract
Introduction
The short half-life of standard factor VIII (FVIII) products means that frequent injections (3 to 4 times/week) are needed for e...
A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose
A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose
Abstract
Background
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive, debilitating symptoms that ...
Risk of Infections with BCMA-Directed Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma
Risk of Infections with BCMA-Directed Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma
Abstract
Introduction: B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a novel target for T cell immunotherapy in MM including bispecific antibody (bsAb) and chimeric antigen re...
Comparison of Conventional Xrays with CT Based Approaches for Detection of Lytic Lesions in Multiple Myeloma
Comparison of Conventional Xrays with CT Based Approaches for Detection of Lytic Lesions in Multiple Myeloma
Background: Lytic bone lesions are one of the most common clinical characteristics of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and identification of bone lesions help distinguish betwee...
Phase 2 Study of Tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059), a Second-Generation Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Monotherapy in Patients with Treatment-Naïve or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Phase 2 Study of Tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059), a Second-Generation Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Monotherapy in Patients with Treatment-Naïve or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
BACKGROUND
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma in which bone marrow is infiltrated by immunoglobulin M (IgM)-producing clonal lymphopl...

