Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Unvarnishing Reality

View through CrossRef
Unvarnishing Reality draws original insight to the literature, politics, history, and culture of the cold war by closely examining the themes and goals of American and Russian satirical fiction. As Derek C. Maus illustrates, the paranoia of nuclear standoff provided a subversive storytelling mode for authors from both nations—including Thomas Pynchon, Robert Coover, John Barth, Walker Percy, Don DeLillo, Kurt Vonnegut Jr., Vasily Aksyonov, Yuz Aleshkovsky, Alexander Zinoviev, Vladimir Voinovich, Fazil Iskander, and Sasha Sokolov. Maus surveys the background of each nation's culture, language, sociology, politics, and philosophy to map the foundation on which cold war satire was built. By highlighting common themes of utopianism, technology, and propaganda, Maus effectively shows the ultimate motive of satirists on both sides was to question the various forces contributing to the cold war and to expose the absurdity of the continuous tension that pulsed between the United States and the Soviet Union for nearly half a century. Although cold war literature has been studied extensively, few critics have focused so keenly on comparisons of satirical fictions by Russian and American writers that condemn and subvert the polarizing ideologies inherent in superpower rivalry. Such a comparison reveals thematic and structural similarities that transcend specific national and cultural origins. In considering these works together, Maus locates a thoroughgoing humanistic refutation of the cold war and its operative doctrines as well as a range of proposed alternatives. Just as the cold war combatants ultimately reconciled in 1991 with the fall of the Soviet Union, Maus seeks to bring these two literary canons together now. Their thematic scope transcends cultural differences, and, as Maus demonstrates, these writers saw that there was not only the atomic bomb to fear, but also the dangers of complete national militarization and the constant polarizing threat of emergency. Thus their cold war critiques still resonate today and invite further comparative studies such as this one.
University of South Carolina Press
Title: Unvarnishing Reality
Description:
Unvarnishing Reality draws original insight to the literature, politics, history, and culture of the cold war by closely examining the themes and goals of American and Russian satirical fiction.
As Derek C.
Maus illustrates, the paranoia of nuclear standoff provided a subversive storytelling mode for authors from both nations—including Thomas Pynchon, Robert Coover, John Barth, Walker Percy, Don DeLillo, Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
, Vasily Aksyonov, Yuz Aleshkovsky, Alexander Zinoviev, Vladimir Voinovich, Fazil Iskander, and Sasha Sokolov.
Maus surveys the background of each nation's culture, language, sociology, politics, and philosophy to map the foundation on which cold war satire was built.
By highlighting common themes of utopianism, technology, and propaganda, Maus effectively shows the ultimate motive of satirists on both sides was to question the various forces contributing to the cold war and to expose the absurdity of the continuous tension that pulsed between the United States and the Soviet Union for nearly half a century.
Although cold war literature has been studied extensively, few critics have focused so keenly on comparisons of satirical fictions by Russian and American writers that condemn and subvert the polarizing ideologies inherent in superpower rivalry.
Such a comparison reveals thematic and structural similarities that transcend specific national and cultural origins.
In considering these works together, Maus locates a thoroughgoing humanistic refutation of the cold war and its operative doctrines as well as a range of proposed alternatives.
Just as the cold war combatants ultimately reconciled in 1991 with the fall of the Soviet Union, Maus seeks to bring these two literary canons together now.
Their thematic scope transcends cultural differences, and, as Maus demonstrates, these writers saw that there was not only the atomic bomb to fear, but also the dangers of complete national militarization and the constant polarizing threat of emergency.
Thus their cold war critiques still resonate today and invite further comparative studies such as this one.

Related Results

Comparing cybersickness in virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays
Comparing cybersickness in virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays
Introduction: Defence Research and Development Canada is developing guidance on the use of Mixed Reality head-mounted displays for naval operations in the Royal Canadian Navy. Virt...
Augmented Reality for Smoking Cessation: Development and Usability Study (Preprint)
Augmented Reality for Smoking Cessation: Development and Usability Study (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The recent widespread availability of augmented reality via smartphone offers an opportunity to translate cue exposure therapy for smoking cessat...
VR 101
VR 101
Today we call many things “virtual.” Virtual corporations connect teams of workers located across the country. In leisure time, people form clubs based on shared interests in polit...
The nature of contemporary reality
The nature of contemporary reality
Reality seems to have become a matter of ownership-everyone supposedly has the right to 'their' reality. In contrast, to this supposed freedom of acceptance, there is a 'scientific...
Shaping Reality: An Interplay of Freudian and Lacanian Psychoanalysis
Shaping Reality: An Interplay of Freudian and Lacanian Psychoanalysis
This paper delves into the shaping of reality in Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis with references to D. W. Winnicott and Slavoj Žižek’s works. It articulates how psychoanalytic...
Physical Meaning of Euclidean Approach to the Problems of Relativity
Physical Meaning of Euclidean Approach to the Problems of Relativity
INTRODUCTION: In this paper, we discuss the fundamental problem of the relationship between the true and observed shapes of reality. OBJECTIIVES: Considered is the problem if, is ...
Racing Simulacra?
Racing Simulacra?
"So which is the most authentic experience for an end-user steeped in car culture? Real, made-in-Japan Type R? Or virtual, programmed-in-Japan Type-R. Each Type-R is equally enjoya...

Back to Top