Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Factors associated with U.S. hospital payer-specific negotiated mammography charges.
View through CrossRef
e13633 Background: The Hospital Price Transparency Rule, effective 1/1/2021, requires hospitals to publish payer-specific negotiated charges and cash prices. Given differences in insurance coverage for screening versus diagnostic mammography, we evaluate factors associated with these payer-negotiated charges. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of U.S. acute care and critical access hospitals in CMS’ Care Compare linked to Turquoise Health (payer-negotiated charges), Healthcare Cost Report Information System (hospital characteristics) and Social Vulnerability Indices by county. Negotiated charges for mammography (CPT: screening 77067; diagnostic unilateral 77065, bilateral 77066) were estimated by payer type (self-pay, managed Medicare/Medicaid, or commercial). Adjusted models estimated commercial charges accounting for hospital factors. Results: Most hospitals (N=4212) were non-profits (61%) and acute care hospitals (69%). Median operating margin was .03 (IQR:-.03, .09), asset-to-liability ratio was 1.79 (1.06, 2.96), and social vulnerability index was .53 (.29, .74). 48-50% reported mammography charges. Charges were greater for commercial insurance compared to Medicare/Medicaid (+$55-$82 screening, +$122-$132 bilateral diagnostic; P<.001, all tests). Charges for commercial insurance were similar to self-pay for bilateral screening (p=.41) and diagnostic (p=.08) mammography. See Table for adjusted analysis of commercial charges. Conclusions: Our analysis showed U.S. negotiated mammography charges are similar for self-pay and commercial payers. Commercial charges are higher at private hospitals and those with higher operating margins for diagnostic exams, and lower in socially vulnerable areas. Price transparency may promote competition to lower healthcare prices and highlight any financial toxicity associated with self-pay charges. [Table: see text]
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Factors associated with U.S. hospital payer-specific negotiated mammography charges.
Description:
e13633 Background: The Hospital Price Transparency Rule, effective 1/1/2021, requires hospitals to publish payer-specific negotiated charges and cash prices.
Given differences in insurance coverage for screening versus diagnostic mammography, we evaluate factors associated with these payer-negotiated charges.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of U.
S.
acute care and critical access hospitals in CMS’ Care Compare linked to Turquoise Health (payer-negotiated charges), Healthcare Cost Report Information System (hospital characteristics) and Social Vulnerability Indices by county.
Negotiated charges for mammography (CPT: screening 77067; diagnostic unilateral 77065, bilateral 77066) were estimated by payer type (self-pay, managed Medicare/Medicaid, or commercial).
Adjusted models estimated commercial charges accounting for hospital factors.
Results: Most hospitals (N=4212) were non-profits (61%) and acute care hospitals (69%).
Median operating margin was .
03 (IQR:-.
03, .
09), asset-to-liability ratio was 1.
79 (1.
06, 2.
96), and social vulnerability index was .
53 (.
29, .
74).
48-50% reported mammography charges.
Charges were greater for commercial insurance compared to Medicare/Medicaid (+$55-$82 screening, +$122-$132 bilateral diagnostic; P<.
001, all tests).
Charges for commercial insurance were similar to self-pay for bilateral screening (p=.
41) and diagnostic (p=.
08) mammography.
See Table for adjusted analysis of commercial charges.
Conclusions: Our analysis showed U.
S.
negotiated mammography charges are similar for self-pay and commercial payers.
Commercial charges are higher at private hospitals and those with higher operating margins for diagnostic exams, and lower in socially vulnerable areas.
Price transparency may promote competition to lower healthcare prices and highlight any financial toxicity associated with self-pay charges.
[Table: see text].
Related Results
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract
Latinas have relatively low rates of mammography screening participation, which may contribute to later stage of breast cancer at diagnosis for Latinas, and...
Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
Introduction
There is no national breast cancer screening implemented in Nigeria. The National Cancer Control Plan (NCCP) has a goal of making screening services ...
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Background: Most late-stage breast cancer occurs in those who have never been screened. Uninsured women have lower screening rates than insured women. Student-run free clinics (SRF...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
Abstract
Background
There is growing concern that routine mammography screening is overused among older women. Successful and equitable de-implementation of mammography wi...
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
Abstract
Background
There is growing concern that routine mammography screening is overused among older women. Successful and equitable de-implementation of mammography wi...
Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model
Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model
Abstract
Background
Mammography screening is the main method for early detection of breast cancer in Norway. Few studies have focused on psychologic...
Health Disparities in Receipt of Screening Mammography in Latinas: A Critical Review of Recent Literature
Health Disparities in Receipt of Screening Mammography in Latinas: A Critical Review of Recent Literature
Background
Increased use of screening mammography is associated with lower death rates from breast cancer in the United States. Despite recommendations that wom...

