Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THE CARBON CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW
View through CrossRef
Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies remove carbon dioxide from flue gases. It is then stored instead of being released into the atmosphere. CCS has the potential to mitigate global warming by capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) at its major production centres such as fossil fuel power plants. Large scale capture of CO2has already been achieved commercially. The CCS is technically feasible and fairly well developed but to date no large-scale power plant is being operated with a full carbon capture and storage system. Compared to a plant without CCS, one with CCS can cut CO2 emissions to the atmosphere by approximately 80-90%. However, the energy required to accomplish CCS increases the fuel needs of a coal-fired plant by about 25%. This, combined with the total system costs significantly increases the cost of energy. This makes CSS currently a relatively expensive mitigation option. Still if fossil fuels remain a major part of the energy mix, the global exigency to reduce carbon dioxide emissions laid under Kyoto protocol can make CCS an attractive option. This article discusses the possibilities and limitations of CCS. The technical and economic uncertainties and obstacles in the implementation of CCS have been illustrated. The status of industrial-scale storage projects in operation and those in the pipeline has also been reviewed.
Title: THE CARBON CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW
Description:
Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies remove carbon dioxide from flue gases.
It is then stored instead of being released into the atmosphere.
CCS has the potential to mitigate global warming by capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) at its major production centres such as fossil fuel power plants.
Large scale capture of CO2has already been achieved commercially.
The CCS is technically feasible and fairly well developed but to date no large-scale power plant is being operated with a full carbon capture and storage system.
Compared to a plant without CCS, one with CCS can cut CO2 emissions to the atmosphere by approximately 80-90%.
However, the energy required to accomplish CCS increases the fuel needs of a coal-fired plant by about 25%.
This, combined with the total system costs significantly increases the cost of energy.
This makes CSS currently a relatively expensive mitigation option.
Still if fossil fuels remain a major part of the energy mix, the global exigency to reduce carbon dioxide emissions laid under Kyoto protocol can make CCS an attractive option.
This article discusses the possibilities and limitations of CCS.
The technical and economic uncertainties and obstacles in the implementation of CCS have been illustrated.
The status of industrial-scale storage projects in operation and those in the pipeline has also been reviewed.
Related Results
Recent Legal Developments in Carbon Sequestration
Recent Legal Developments in Carbon Sequestration
Abstract
Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing carbon dioxide ("CO2") emissions, which would otherwise be released into the atmosphere, and permanently st...
Simulating carbon sequestration using cellular automata and land use assessment for Karaj, Iran
Simulating carbon sequestration using cellular automata and land use assessment for Karaj, Iran
Abstract. Carbon sequestration has been proposed as a means of slowing the atmospheric and marine accumulation of greenhouse gases. This study used observed and simulated land use/...
Study on Forest and Grassland Ecological Space Structure in Eyu Mining Area and Potential Alternatives for Enhancing Carbon Sequestration
Study on Forest and Grassland Ecological Space Structure in Eyu Mining Area and Potential Alternatives for Enhancing Carbon Sequestration
Optimizing the connectivity-carbon sequestration coupling coordination of forest and grassland ecological spaces (F&GES) is a crucial measure to enhance carbon sequestration ef...
Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing?
Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing?
Context Goals set by countries and corporate entities in response to the Paris climate agreement (COP21) have put a focus on livestock producers to reduce greenhouse gas emission...
Quantifying soil carbon sequestration by multi-source constraints
Quantifying soil carbon sequestration by multi-source constraints
<p><span>Soil carbon cycle is a large yet poorly understood component of the global carbon cycle under climate change. The transient behaviour of the so...
Research on Spatiotemporal Changes in Carbon Footprint and Vegetation Carbon Carrying Capacity in Shanxi Province
Research on Spatiotemporal Changes in Carbon Footprint and Vegetation Carbon Carrying Capacity in Shanxi Province
The climate and ecological problems caused by excessive carbon dioxide emissions are attracting more and more attention, and the need for carbon reduction has reached a consensus. ...
Forest Structure and Potential of Carbon Storage at Khao Nam Sab, Kasetsart University, Sri Racha Campus, Chonburi Province
Forest Structure and Potential of Carbon Storage at Khao Nam Sab, Kasetsart University, Sri Racha Campus, Chonburi Province
Background and Objectives: Tropical Forest ecosystems are globally significant for their roles in biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, and carbon sequestration. In Thaila...
Carbon emission reduction in arable farming: Farmer crop portfolio responses to varying carbon credit pricing scenarios
Carbon emission reduction in arable farming: Farmer crop portfolio responses to varying carbon credit pricing scenarios
The agricultural sector contributes by approximately 22% of the global greenhouse gas emissions. Private carbon certification and emerging carbon markets offer farms a remuneration...

