Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Obligations of Empire
View through CrossRef
AbstractThis chapter focuses on imperial directives mandating participation in animal sacrifice. Decius’s decree of 250 CE, requiring all inhabitants to perform animal sacrifice, established it as a marker of self-identification with the empire but also prompted Christian leaders to insist that it was incompatible with Christian allegiance. Although Valerian’s directives of 257 and 258 had the goal of undermining Christian communities, he, too, required Roman subjects to engage in cult practices. In contrast, his son and successor Gallienus extended recognition to Christian associations and severed the connection between animal sacrifice and identification with Rome, adopting a policy of neutrality regarding religious adherence. The cycle was repeated in the early fourth century CE when the “Great Persecution” of Diocletian, Galerius, and Maximinus, with edicts abolishing Christian institutions and enforcing participation in animal sacrifice, was ended by Constantine and Licinius, who gave all people the right to engage in worship of their choice. Underlying these swings between imperial enforcement of animal sacrifice and religious neutrality was a shift in the social function and cultural significance of animal sacrifice, away from its role of structuring sociopolitical hierarchies and building cultural consensus and into a new role as marker of allegiance to the empire.
Oxford University PressNew York
Title: The Obligations of Empire
Description:
AbstractThis chapter focuses on imperial directives mandating participation in animal sacrifice.
Decius’s decree of 250 CE, requiring all inhabitants to perform animal sacrifice, established it as a marker of self-identification with the empire but also prompted Christian leaders to insist that it was incompatible with Christian allegiance.
Although Valerian’s directives of 257 and 258 had the goal of undermining Christian communities, he, too, required Roman subjects to engage in cult practices.
In contrast, his son and successor Gallienus extended recognition to Christian associations and severed the connection between animal sacrifice and identification with Rome, adopting a policy of neutrality regarding religious adherence.
The cycle was repeated in the early fourth century CE when the “Great Persecution” of Diocletian, Galerius, and Maximinus, with edicts abolishing Christian institutions and enforcing participation in animal sacrifice, was ended by Constantine and Licinius, who gave all people the right to engage in worship of their choice.
Underlying these swings between imperial enforcement of animal sacrifice and religious neutrality was a shift in the social function and cultural significance of animal sacrifice, away from its role of structuring sociopolitical hierarchies and building cultural consensus and into a new role as marker of allegiance to the empire.
Related Results
Lze vynucovat některé mezinárodní závazky za použití síly?
Lze vynucovat některé mezinárodní závazky za použití síly?
This paper focused on the analysis of enforcement of state responsibility for breaches of some international obligations of an essential nature. These obligations relate to non-pro...
Associative Obligations and Political Obligations
Associative Obligations and Political Obligations
Abstract
In Law’s Empire Ronald Dworkin offers an account of political obligations as associative obligations. Associative obligations are special obligations such a...
Positive and negative obligations in the practice of the ECtHR based on article 2 of the ECHR
Positive and negative obligations in the practice of the ECtHR based on article 2 of the ECHR
It is indicated that the combination of positive and negative obligations of the state plays a key role in the protection of human rights. Considering such a basic right as the rig...
Political Obligation
Political Obligation
The moral obligation to obey the law, or as it is generally called, political obligation, is a moral requirement to obey the laws of one’s country. Traditionally, this has been vie...
Les obligations non matérialisées dans les contrats
Les obligations non matérialisées dans les contrats
L’analyse de la pratique et de la jurisprudence démontre qu’indépendamment de l’existence ou non d’un acteinstrumentaire, certaines obligations dont le contenu n’est pas retranscri...
Contractual obligations in Roman law: The genesis of the main forms
Contractual obligations in Roman law: The genesis of the main forms
Roman law is the basis for many modern Western European legal systems, and it is used by the vast majority of modern researchers and lawyers. Obligations are one of the main legal ...
The Nature of Performance of Obligations in Iranian and Iraqi Law
The Nature of Performance of Obligations in Iranian and Iraqi Law
In light of the recognition of the principle of fulfilling obligations and contracts as a necessary condition of religious commitment and one of the most important theoretical foun...
GLOBAL OBLIGATIONS AND THE AGENCY OBJECTION
GLOBAL OBLIGATIONS AND THE AGENCY OBJECTION
AbstractMany authors hold that collectives, as well as individuals can be the subjects of obligations. Typically these authors have focussed on the obligations of highly structured...

