Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Benefit of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Japanese Patients Based on Modified MADIT-ICD Benefit Score
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Aims
The MADIT-ICD benefit score is used to stratify the risk of life-threatening arrhythmia and non-arrhythmic mortality. We sought to develop an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) benefit-prediction score for Japanese patients with ICDs.
Methods
Patients who underwent ICD implantation as primary prophylaxis were retrospectively enrolled. Based on their MADIT-ICD benefit scores, we developed a modified MADIT-ICD benefit score adapted to the Japanese population. The primary endpoints were appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause death without appropriate ICD therapy (non-arrhythmic death). We used the Fine and Gray multivariate model and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify factors for adjusting the MADIT-ICD benefit–risk score specifically for the Japanese population. The scoring points for the original MADIT-ICD benefit score were adjusted to optimal points based on the multivariate analysis results in the population.
Results
The study enrolled 167 patients [age, 61.9 ± 12.3 years; male individuals, 138 (82.6%); cardiac resynchronization therapy, 73 (43.7%); ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 53 (31.7%)]. Fourteen patients received anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, and 23 received shock therapy as the initial appropriate ICD therapy. Non-arrhythmic deaths occurred in 37 patients. The original MADIT-ICD benefit score could not stratify non-arrhythmic mortality in the Japanese population. The patients were reclassified into three groups according to the modified MADIT-ICD benefit score. The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score could effectively stratify the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality. In the highest-benefit group, the 10 year cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality were 56.8% and 12.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). In the intermediate-benefit group, these rates were 20.2% and 40.2% (P = 0.01). In the lowest-benefit group, the incidence of non-arrhythmic deaths was 68.1%, and no patient received appropriate ICD therapy.
Conclusions
The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score may be useful for stratifying ICD candidates in the Japanese population.
Title: Benefit of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Japanese Patients Based on Modified MADIT-ICD Benefit Score
Description:
Abstract
Aims
The MADIT-ICD benefit score is used to stratify the risk of life-threatening arrhythmia and non-arrhythmic mortality.
We sought to develop an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) benefit-prediction score for Japanese patients with ICDs.
Methods
Patients who underwent ICD implantation as primary prophylaxis were retrospectively enrolled.
Based on their MADIT-ICD benefit scores, we developed a modified MADIT-ICD benefit score adapted to the Japanese population.
The primary endpoints were appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause death without appropriate ICD therapy (non-arrhythmic death).
We used the Fine and Gray multivariate model and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify factors for adjusting the MADIT-ICD benefit–risk score specifically for the Japanese population.
The scoring points for the original MADIT-ICD benefit score were adjusted to optimal points based on the multivariate analysis results in the population.
Results
The study enrolled 167 patients [age, 61.
9 ± 12.
3 years; male individuals, 138 (82.
6%); cardiac resynchronization therapy, 73 (43.
7%); ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 53 (31.
7%)].
Fourteen patients received anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, and 23 received shock therapy as the initial appropriate ICD therapy.
Non-arrhythmic deaths occurred in 37 patients.
The original MADIT-ICD benefit score could not stratify non-arrhythmic mortality in the Japanese population.
The patients were reclassified into three groups according to the modified MADIT-ICD benefit score.
The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score could effectively stratify the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality.
In the highest-benefit group, the 10 year cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality were 56.
8% and 12.
9%, respectively (P < 0.
01).
In the intermediate-benefit group, these rates were 20.
2% and 40.
2% (P = 0.
01).
In the lowest-benefit group, the incidence of non-arrhythmic deaths was 68.
1%, and no patient received appropriate ICD therapy.
Conclusions
The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score may be useful for stratifying ICD candidates in the Japanese population.
Related Results
Clinical outcomes of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy in a polymorbid patient cohort
Clinical outcomes of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy in a polymorbid patient cohort
BackgroundThe subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has been designed to overcome lead-related complications and device endocarditis. Lacking the ability for ...
Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Hospitalizations in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial
Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Hospitalizations in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial
Background—
This study reports the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on hospitalizations in patients randomized to implantable cardioverter-defibrillato...
The Effect of Clinical Knee Measurement in Children with Genu Varus
The Effect of Clinical Knee Measurement in Children with Genu Varus
Abstract
Introduction
Children with genu varus needs frequent assessment and follow up that may need several radiographies. This study investigates the effectiveness of the clinica...
Trends in Use and In-Hospital Outcomes of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis
Trends in Use and In-Hospital Outcomes of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis
Background and objectives
Patients on dialysis are at high risk of complications related to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation; use of subcutaneo...
Abstract 13663: 90-day Safety and Performance Outcomes With a Novel Extravascular ICD Lead
Abstract 13663: 90-day Safety and Performance Outcomes With a Novel Extravascular ICD Lead
Introduction:
Long-term transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads have many pitfalls. There is in development a novel extravascular (EV) ICD lead f...
Outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival in advanced heart failure with reduced eje...
Zero to hero
Zero to hero
Western images of Japan tell a seemingly incongruous story of love, sex and marriage – one full of contradictions and conflicting moral codes. We sometimes hear intriguing stories ...
Evaluating Common Variants in NOS1AP in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Secondary Prevention
Evaluating Common Variants in NOS1AP in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Secondary Prevention
Abstract
Background
Contemporary researchers found single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nitric oxide synthase 1 adaptor protein (NOS1AP) gene are associated with alte...

