Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mapping Ada onto embedded systems: memory constraints

View through CrossRef
Running Ada programs on a self-targeting system with "virtually" unlimited memory (such as a mainframe), is quite different from running Ada on an embedded target. On self-targeting systems, the compiler and linker will automatically distribute the code, data, constants, and task-stacks onto available resources; the user need not worry about the details. On the other hand, the Ada developer in an embedded environment must understand how to explicitly instruct the development system to allocate resources. For example, to override default settings, (usually set to make the compiler look good on small benchmark programs), 'STORAGE_SIZE length representation settings must be given for task and access types, and linker directives must be given for size and location of code, data, heap, and stack areas. While embedded system technology has always required such settings, many of the parameters could be determined using the programmer's knowledge of implementation details. With Ada, the compiler and linker hide the implementation and the user is faced with setting these parameters with little or no guidance.Unfortunately, few, if any, Ada texts deal with how to set embedded system parameters. In addition, CASE tools usually do not help in these areas. To further complicate matters, even Ada compiler manuals do not adequately describe how to set embedded system parameters solely as a function of Ada constructs. Instead, compiler manuals provide guidelines based not only on Ada constructs but also on other parameters that only run-time system experts understand. Substantial time can be wasted trying to derive the setup values. Incorrect guesses may necessitate recompiling those portions of the program that are affected by representation clause changes.This article will develop formulas that will help estimate the minimum memory and CPU execution needs of an Ada program as a function of source code constructs. The formulas should, 1) help designers and programmers to better assess whether Ada programs will fit in a target environment, 2) reduce recompilation time when representation specifications are present in the specification portion of packages, and 3) remind programmers of the execution costs of various Ada language constructs.
Title: Mapping Ada onto embedded systems: memory constraints
Description:
Running Ada programs on a self-targeting system with "virtually" unlimited memory (such as a mainframe), is quite different from running Ada on an embedded target.
On self-targeting systems, the compiler and linker will automatically distribute the code, data, constants, and task-stacks onto available resources; the user need not worry about the details.
On the other hand, the Ada developer in an embedded environment must understand how to explicitly instruct the development system to allocate resources.
For example, to override default settings, (usually set to make the compiler look good on small benchmark programs), 'STORAGE_SIZE length representation settings must be given for task and access types, and linker directives must be given for size and location of code, data, heap, and stack areas.
While embedded system technology has always required such settings, many of the parameters could be determined using the programmer's knowledge of implementation details.
With Ada, the compiler and linker hide the implementation and the user is faced with setting these parameters with little or no guidance.
Unfortunately, few, if any, Ada texts deal with how to set embedded system parameters.
In addition, CASE tools usually do not help in these areas.
To further complicate matters, even Ada compiler manuals do not adequately describe how to set embedded system parameters solely as a function of Ada constructs.
Instead, compiler manuals provide guidelines based not only on Ada constructs but also on other parameters that only run-time system experts understand.
Substantial time can be wasted trying to derive the setup values.
Incorrect guesses may necessitate recompiling those portions of the program that are affected by representation clause changes.
This article will develop formulas that will help estimate the minimum memory and CPU execution needs of an Ada program as a function of source code constructs.
The formulas should, 1) help designers and programmers to better assess whether Ada programs will fit in a target environment, 2) reduce recompilation time when representation specifications are present in the specification portion of packages, and 3) remind programmers of the execution costs of various Ada language constructs.

Related Results

REVIEWING THE IMPACT OF EMBEDDED SYSTEMS IN MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE USA
REVIEWING THE IMPACT OF EMBEDDED SYSTEMS IN MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE USA
The integration of embedded systems in medical devices has revolutionized the healthcare landscape in the United States, fostering advancements in patient care, diagnostics, and tr...
Comparison of LA and PVC mapping using OCTARAY and OPTRELL catheters
Comparison of LA and PVC mapping using OCTARAY and OPTRELL catheters
AbstractBackgroundMultielectrode mapping catheters, such as the OCTARAY and OPTRELL, are essential in creating myocardial electroanatomical mapping in arrhythmias. The OCTARAY is a...
Optimized Meta-path extracted graph neural network for embedded computer performance evaluation model
Optimized Meta-path extracted graph neural network for embedded computer performance evaluation model
The process of evaluating the effectiveness, speed, and general capabilities of a computer system that is embedded inside a larger device or system and created for a particular pur...
Study on Conjugate Problems of Fuzzy Mappings
Study on Conjugate Problems of Fuzzy Mappings
First, a new definition of conjugate mapping concept for convex fuzzy mapping is given in this paper, which is more reasonable than the concept in the literature. Then, we prove th...
Mixed-Reality Geotechnical Cell Mapping for Slope Stability Assessment at Rio Tinto Bingham Canyon Mine
Mixed-Reality Geotechnical Cell Mapping for Slope Stability Assessment at Rio Tinto Bingham Canyon Mine
ABSTRACT: In this paper, the applicability of Mixed Reality (MR) in combination with Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry data is investigated to aid the ...
Design of an Embedded System: Bedside Patient Monitor
Design of an Embedded System: Bedside Patient Monitor
Embedded systems in the range of from a tiny microcontroller-based sensor device to mobile smart phones have vast variety of applications. However, in the literature there is no up...
Shared Histories in Multiethnic Societies: Literature as a Critical Corrective of Cultural Memory Studies
Shared Histories in Multiethnic Societies: Literature as a Critical Corrective of Cultural Memory Studies
AbstractThe staging of history in literature is engaged in dynamic exchange with society’s memory discourses and in this context, literature is generally seen as playing a creative...
Software driven approach for Embedded Devices
Software driven approach for Embedded Devices
This paper presents the possible new design paradigm that emerged during the author’s design of an embedded communication device for Croatian Navy. Prior to codesign techniques tha...

Back to Top