Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: short‐term results of a double‐blind randomized controlled trial

View through CrossRef
AbstractAimThere is scepticism regarding anatomical rationale and Doppler guidance for ligation of haemorrhoidal arteries. The null hypothesis of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was that there is no difference in pain following dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy for grade III/IV internal haemorrhoids in a minimum of three quadrants.MethodThis was a single‐centre, double‐blind RCT. Patients were allocated to dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy. Included haemorrhoids were grade III, prolapsing but reducible; and grade IV, chronic non‐incarcerated. The primary end‐point was pain. Patients with external component, acute incarcerated grade IV or recurrent haemorrhoids were not included. The interventions were dearterialization (with Doppler guidance and mucopexy) or haemorrhoidectomy. The main outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).ResultsTwenty dearterialization patients were comparable to 20 haemorrhoidectomy patients for age (P = 0.107), body mass index (P = 0.559), race (P = 0.437), American Society of Anesthesiology score (P = 0.569), comorbidities (P = 0.592), grade (P = 0.096), quadrants (P = 0.222), Fecal Incontinence Quality‐of‐Life Score (FIQOL; P = 0.388), coping (P = 0.532), depression (P = 0.505), embarrassment (P = 0.842), and Short Form Health Survey (SF‐12) physical components (P = 0.337), SF‐12 mental components (P = 0.396) and constipation (P = 0.628) scores. Dearterialization patients had shorter operative time (36 vs 54 min, P = 0.043) with less pain (P = 0.011) and urinary retention (P = 0.012). Dearterialization patients had first bowel movement earlier (1.3 vs 4.6 days, P = 0.001), less pain (P = 0.011) and lower pain intensity (P = 0.001). Narcotic requirements were reduced in dearterialization patients (25% vs 100%, P = 0.001), with less medication (4.9 vs 112 pills, P = 0.001) and shorter regimen (0 vs 7 days, P = 0.001). BPI did not differ on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 except for less pain in dearterialization patients. At 3 months, symptomatic relief was the same with no differences in BPI, FIQOL or SF‐12.ConclusionCompared with haemorrhoidectomy, dearterialization led to less pain in grade III/IV haemorrhoids.
Title: Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: short‐term results of a double‐blind randomized controlled trial
Description:
AbstractAimThere is scepticism regarding anatomical rationale and Doppler guidance for ligation of haemorrhoidal arteries.
The null hypothesis of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was that there is no difference in pain following dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy for grade III/IV internal haemorrhoids in a minimum of three quadrants.
MethodThis was a single‐centre, double‐blind RCT.
Patients were allocated to dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy.
Included haemorrhoids were grade III, prolapsing but reducible; and grade IV, chronic non‐incarcerated.
The primary end‐point was pain.
Patients with external component, acute incarcerated grade IV or recurrent haemorrhoids were not included.
The interventions were dearterialization (with Doppler guidance and mucopexy) or haemorrhoidectomy.
The main outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
ResultsTwenty dearterialization patients were comparable to 20 haemorrhoidectomy patients for age (P = 0.
107), body mass index (P = 0.
559), race (P = 0.
437), American Society of Anesthesiology score (P = 0.
569), comorbidities (P = 0.
592), grade (P = 0.
096), quadrants (P = 0.
222), Fecal Incontinence Quality‐of‐Life Score (FIQOL; P = 0.
388), coping (P = 0.
532), depression (P = 0.
505), embarrassment (P = 0.
842), and Short Form Health Survey (SF‐12) physical components (P = 0.
337), SF‐12 mental components (P = 0.
396) and constipation (P = 0.
628) scores.
Dearterialization patients had shorter operative time (36 vs 54 min, P = 0.
043) with less pain (P = 0.
011) and urinary retention (P = 0.
012).
Dearterialization patients had first bowel movement earlier (1.
3 vs 4.
6 days, P = 0.
001), less pain (P = 0.
011) and lower pain intensity (P = 0.
001).
Narcotic requirements were reduced in dearterialization patients (25% vs 100%, P = 0.
001), with less medication (4.
9 vs 112 pills, P = 0.
001) and shorter regimen (0 vs 7 days, P = 0.
001).
BPI did not differ on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 except for less pain in dearterialization patients.
At 3 months, symptomatic relief was the same with no differences in BPI, FIQOL or SF‐12.
ConclusionCompared with haemorrhoidectomy, dearterialization led to less pain in grade III/IV haemorrhoids.

Related Results

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Cause of Early Failure of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty with Mucopexy in 3rd and 4th Degree Hemorrhoids at Shifa Hospital Saidu Sharif Swat
Cause of Early Failure of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty with Mucopexy in 3rd and 4th Degree Hemorrhoids at Shifa Hospital Saidu Sharif Swat
Purpose of Study: Common surgical approaches in the management of hemorrhoid disease such as standard Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomies are with severe postoperative pain and long...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LASER HEMORRHOIDOPLASTY PROCEDURE VS OPEN HEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN THIRD AND FOURTH DEGREE HEMORRHOIDS.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LASER HEMORRHOIDOPLASTY PROCEDURE VS OPEN HEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN THIRD AND FOURTH DEGREE HEMORRHOIDS.
Haemorrhoids are common anorectal condition which can be dened as a symptomatic enlargement and distal displacement of normal anal cushion. It affects both gender and all ages equ...
Haemorrhoids: Aetiology to Management
Haemorrhoids: Aetiology to Management
The definition of “haemorrhoids” and the epidemiology of these conditions have long been contentious. Unfortunately, we still do not understand the full scope of this phenomenon de...
Interventional treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients
Interventional treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients
Anticoagulants are currently widely used for cardiological reasons, stroke prevention and in other vascular diseases. Colorectal surgeons face patients suffering from haemorrhoids ...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...

Back to Top