Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, mucopexy, and hybrid combination for grade III hemorrhoids: a large retrospective cohort study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Mucopexy has emerged as a nonexcisional alternative to Milligan–Morgan (MM) hemorrhoidectomy. Objective This study compares MM, mucopexy, and hybrid MM/mucopexy procedures in patients with grade III hemorrhoidal disease (HD). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary referral setting. Patients Symptomatic grade III HD treated between 2016 and 2018. Interventions Four groups were defined: group 1 included patients treated with MM alone; group 2 received mucopexy on one pile combined with MM on the remaining two; group 3 underwent mucopexy on two piles with MM on the remaining one; and group 4 was treated with mucopexy alone. Main outcomes measures Recurrence rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using a visual-analogic scale (VAS) at 2 years, postoperative pain at 7 days, early complication rates at 30 days, and PROMs at 30 days. Results A total of 686 consecutive patients with III-degree HD were included in the analysis. The most frequent approach was MM alone (group 1, n  = 309, 45%), followed by mucopexy alone (group 4, n  = 138, 20.2%), then the combined approaches (group 2, n  = 120, 17.5%; group 3, n  = 119, 17.3%). Group 4 had the lowest pain scores and the highest 30-day PROM ( p  < 0.001), whereas group 1 showed the best long-term results, with the lowest recurrence rate (4.2% versus 14.5% in group 4) and highest long-term PROM. Limitations Retrospective analysis. Conclusions Mucopexy and the hybrid procedures reduce morbidity and enhances early postoperative PROM in grade III HD. However, its higher recurrence rate suggests that a patient- and pile-specific approach may help balance efficacy with surgical invasiveness.
Title: Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, mucopexy, and hybrid combination for grade III hemorrhoids: a large retrospective cohort study
Description:
Abstract Background Mucopexy has emerged as a nonexcisional alternative to Milligan–Morgan (MM) hemorrhoidectomy.
Objective This study compares MM, mucopexy, and hybrid MM/mucopexy procedures in patients with grade III hemorrhoidal disease (HD).
Design Retrospective cohort study.
Setting Tertiary referral setting.
Patients Symptomatic grade III HD treated between 2016 and 2018.
Interventions Four groups were defined: group 1 included patients treated with MM alone; group 2 received mucopexy on one pile combined with MM on the remaining two; group 3 underwent mucopexy on two piles with MM on the remaining one; and group 4 was treated with mucopexy alone.
Main outcomes measures Recurrence rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using a visual-analogic scale (VAS) at 2 years, postoperative pain at 7 days, early complication rates at 30 days, and PROMs at 30 days.
Results A total of 686 consecutive patients with III-degree HD were included in the analysis.
The most frequent approach was MM alone (group 1, n  = 309, 45%), followed by mucopexy alone (group 4, n  = 138, 20.
2%), then the combined approaches (group 2, n  = 120, 17.
5%; group 3, n  = 119, 17.
3%).
Group 4 had the lowest pain scores and the highest 30-day PROM ( p  < 0.
001), whereas group 1 showed the best long-term results, with the lowest recurrence rate (4.
2% versus 14.
5% in group 4) and highest long-term PROM.
Limitations Retrospective analysis.
Conclusions Mucopexy and the hybrid procedures reduce morbidity and enhances early postoperative PROM in grade III HD.
However, its higher recurrence rate suggests that a patient- and pile-specific approach may help balance efficacy with surgical invasiveness.

Related Results

Cause of Early Failure of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty with Mucopexy in 3rd and 4th Degree Hemorrhoids at Shifa Hospital Saidu Sharif Swat
Cause of Early Failure of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty with Mucopexy in 3rd and 4th Degree Hemorrhoids at Shifa Hospital Saidu Sharif Swat
Purpose of Study: Common surgical approaches in the management of hemorrhoid disease such as standard Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomies are with severe postoperative pain and long...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
“Comparative study between laser hemorroidoplasty and conventional hemorrhoidectomy”
“Comparative study between laser hemorroidoplasty and conventional hemorrhoidectomy”
Background and aim Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive, painless laser procedure for treating hemorrhoids. Although LHP is claimed to have que...
HEMORRHOIDECTOMY VS RUBBER BAND
HEMORRHOIDECTOMY VS RUBBER BAND
Objectives: To compare open hemorrhoidectomy and Rubber Band Ligation (RBL) in the management of 2nd and 3rd degree hemorrhoids in terms post operative and hospital stay. Design: E...
Stapled Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Study and Comparative Analysis of Outcomes
Stapled Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Study and Comparative Analysis of Outcomes
Background Anorectal hemorrhoids are a common condition that frequently needs surgery in more challenging situations. Both stapled hemorrhoidectomy and conventional hemorrhoidectom...
LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy vs Milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy vs Milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Objective: To explore the efficacy of two surgical procedures by comparing the mean operative time, average blood loss and postoperative pain score during conventional and LigaSure...

Back to Top