Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

William James and Renouvier’s Neo-Kantianism

View through CrossRef
Abstract In this chapter, while acknowledging an important and famous early influence of Renouvier on James’s notions of belief and free will, the author documents a major and growing disagreement in their exchanges. The author argues that this disagreement is by no means a peripheral matter, since it involves James’s assessment of Renouvier’s neo-Kantianism. After having presented the core of Renouvier’s main influence in the section “Free Will’s Champion, Kantian Style,” the author gives a brief survey of James’s presence in the Critique Philosophique in the section “James’s Contributions,” and deals, in the following sections, with James’s early criticisms of Renouvier on philosophical method (the section “Methods and Categories”), on the perception of space and time (the section ”Unbounded Spaces”) and on consciousness (the section ”The Stream of Thought”). In order to accomplish this, the author focuses on a more limited period than James’ career as a whole: the author follows him from the early writings to the mid-1880s—that is, precisely to the point where James and Renouvier’s philosophical itineraries begin to diverge. The author’s larger goal is to illustrate how the Critique Philosophique was at first a hospitable publication for the young James, but also how, from the end of this period on, important disputes emerged, in particular over consciousness, which gave rise to a paradoxical situation: the very organ that contributed to make James known turned out to be at odds with several of his most important theses, before the publication of the Principles, and even more before Pragmatism.
Title: William James and Renouvier’s Neo-Kantianism
Description:
Abstract In this chapter, while acknowledging an important and famous early influence of Renouvier on James’s notions of belief and free will, the author documents a major and growing disagreement in their exchanges.
The author argues that this disagreement is by no means a peripheral matter, since it involves James’s assessment of Renouvier’s neo-Kantianism.
After having presented the core of Renouvier’s main influence in the section “Free Will’s Champion, Kantian Style,” the author gives a brief survey of James’s presence in the Critique Philosophique in the section “James’s Contributions,” and deals, in the following sections, with James’s early criticisms of Renouvier on philosophical method (the section “Methods and Categories”), on the perception of space and time (the section ”Unbounded Spaces”) and on consciousness (the section ”The Stream of Thought”).
In order to accomplish this, the author focuses on a more limited period than James’ career as a whole: the author follows him from the early writings to the mid-1880s—that is, precisely to the point where James and Renouvier’s philosophical itineraries begin to diverge.
The author’s larger goal is to illustrate how the Critique Philosophique was at first a hospitable publication for the young James, but also how, from the end of this period on, important disputes emerged, in particular over consciousness, which gave rise to a paradoxical situation: the very organ that contributed to make James known turned out to be at odds with several of his most important theses, before the publication of the Principles, and even more before Pragmatism.

Related Results

La Réception philosophique du pragmatisme en France : William James dans ses rapports avec Charles Renouvier (1870-1912)
La Réception philosophique du pragmatisme en France : William James dans ses rapports avec Charles Renouvier (1870-1912)
L’intérêt pour le pragmatisme américain marque, entre autres, le paysage intellectuel français, notamment à la fin du XIXᵉ et au début du XXᵉ siècle. Ceci nous amène à nous interro...
Neokantyści Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert i Ernst Cassirer wobec filozofii renesansu
Neokantyści Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert i Ernst Cassirer wobec filozofii renesansu
Neo-Kantianism as a philosophical formation is characterised primarily by its reference to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Nevertheless, to say that the essence of Neo-Kantianism ...
Weimar Philosophy and the Fate of Neo-Kantianism
Weimar Philosophy and the Fate of Neo-Kantianism
This chapter explains the decline of neo-Kantianism. In a polemically revisionist account of this major intellectual movement, it casts neo-Kantians as somewhat less than benevolen...
Neo Banks: A Paradigm Shift in Banking
Neo Banks: A Paradigm Shift in Banking
Purpose: In terms of market structure and competitiveness, Indian banking has seen major changes. The future of banking services is being revolutionised by technical and digital ad...
PENERAPAN ARSITEKTUR NEO VERNAKULAR PADA SELASAR SUNARYO ART SPACE
PENERAPAN ARSITEKTUR NEO VERNAKULAR PADA SELASAR SUNARYO ART SPACE
Abstract: Neo-Vernacular architecture is a concept within the postmodern movement that combines two styles, modern and vernacular. In an increasingly advanced and modern era, moder...
Neo-Kantianism, Russian
Neo-Kantianism, Russian
A rather amorphous movement, Russian Neo-Kantianism, in the first decades of the twentieth century, found its most visible and enduring representatives in A. Vvedenskii and his stu...

Back to Top