Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Neo-Kantianism, Russian
View through CrossRef
A rather amorphous movement, Russian Neo-Kantianism, in the first decades of the twentieth century, found its most visible and enduring representatives in A. Vvedenskii and his student/disciple I. Lapshin, both of St Petersburg University, who together took a distinct stance within the movement as a whole. Both were chiefly concerned with epistemological issues although their respective publications revealed a much wider field of interests. Both maintained an allegiance to the spirit of Kantian philosophy while devoting little attention to the intricacies of the three Kantian Critiques. In addition, at Moscow University G. Chelpanov adhered to the ideality of the Kantian categories although he upheld an ultimate realism. In the social sciences P. Novgorodtsev and B. Kistiakovskii defended positions revealing a significant debt to the Baden School of German Neo-Kantianism, and as such they were deeply involved in methodological investigations. Several others (N. Berdiaev, P. Struve, G. Shpet) within Russia also briefly espoused a Neo-Kantianism after abandoning Marxism and before moving on to a usually more idealistic stance. Still another, younger group a decade later, centred chiefly around the journal Logos, maintained an idiosyncratic, though not fully articulated, amalgam of Kantian and Hegelian doctrines. The Bolshevik Revolution led to a decimation of what remained of the movement within Russia and a dispersal of its members, who became increasingly isolated from current philosophical trends and issues.
Title: Neo-Kantianism, Russian
Description:
A rather amorphous movement, Russian Neo-Kantianism, in the first decades of the twentieth century, found its most visible and enduring representatives in A.
Vvedenskii and his student/disciple I.
Lapshin, both of St Petersburg University, who together took a distinct stance within the movement as a whole.
Both were chiefly concerned with epistemological issues although their respective publications revealed a much wider field of interests.
Both maintained an allegiance to the spirit of Kantian philosophy while devoting little attention to the intricacies of the three Kantian Critiques.
In addition, at Moscow University G.
Chelpanov adhered to the ideality of the Kantian categories although he upheld an ultimate realism.
In the social sciences P.
Novgorodtsev and B.
Kistiakovskii defended positions revealing a significant debt to the Baden School of German Neo-Kantianism, and as such they were deeply involved in methodological investigations.
Several others (N.
Berdiaev, P.
Struve, G.
Shpet) within Russia also briefly espoused a Neo-Kantianism after abandoning Marxism and before moving on to a usually more idealistic stance.
Still another, younger group a decade later, centred chiefly around the journal Logos, maintained an idiosyncratic, though not fully articulated, amalgam of Kantian and Hegelian doctrines.
The Bolshevik Revolution led to a decimation of what remained of the movement within Russia and a dispersal of its members, who became increasingly isolated from current philosophical trends and issues.
Related Results
Neokantyści Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert i Ernst Cassirer wobec filozofii renesansu
Neokantyści Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert i Ernst Cassirer wobec filozofii renesansu
Neo-Kantianism as a philosophical formation is characterised primarily by its reference to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Nevertheless, to say that the essence of Neo-Kantianism ...
Weimar Philosophy and the Fate of Neo-Kantianism
Weimar Philosophy and the Fate of Neo-Kantianism
This chapter explains the decline of neo-Kantianism. In a polemically revisionist account of this major intellectual movement, it casts neo-Kantians as somewhat less than benevolen...
Russian neo-Kantian philosophy of music in the early 20th century in the context of symbolic forms
Russian neo-Kantian philosophy of music in the early 20th century in the context of symbolic forms
In the expanding space of philosophical knowledge, in particular, aesthetics, epistemology, philosophical anthropology, and philosophy of culture, the philosophy of music, which is...
Neo Banks: A Paradigm Shift in Banking
Neo Banks: A Paradigm Shift in Banking
Purpose: In terms of market structure and competitiveness, Indian banking has seen major changes. The future of banking services is being revolutionised by technical and digital ad...
PENERAPAN ARSITEKTUR NEO VERNAKULAR PADA SELASAR SUNARYO ART SPACE
PENERAPAN ARSITEKTUR NEO VERNAKULAR PADA SELASAR SUNARYO ART SPACE
Abstract: Neo-Vernacular architecture is a concept within the postmodern movement that combines two styles, modern and vernacular. In an increasingly advanced and modern era, moder...
NEO-KANTIANISM AND GEORG SIMMEL'S INTERPRETATION OF KANT
NEO-KANTIANISM AND GEORG SIMMEL'S INTERPRETATION OF KANT
This essay explores the development of Georg Simmel's interpretation of Immanuel Kant's philosophy in the context of neo-Kantianism and its preoccupation with the question of unity...
The European Commission funded NEO-MAPP project in support of the ESA Hera mission: Near-Earth Object Modelling And Payload for Protection
The European Commission funded NEO-MAPP project in support of the ESA Hera mission: Near-Earth Object Modelling And Payload for Protection
NEO-MAPP stands for Near Earth Object Modelling And Payload for Protection. This project is funded by the H2020 program of the European Commission and addresses the topic ...
The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The article is devoted to the specifics of existence of the term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries. The foreign texts, which contain the t...

