Javascript must be enabled to continue!
„A Critical Student of Augustine” – Reinhold Niebuhr’s Interpretation of Augustine
View through CrossRef
In the past half-century, the American social sciences have been eager to research Reinhold Niebuhr’s ideas. Most current works on Niebuhr deal with either what Niebuhr thought or its contemporary consequences. This has distracted the attention from the “sources” of Niebuhr, namely, what kind of theoretical influences affected him while shaping his political thought. This objection is valid even in the case of (Saint) Augustine (354-430), who – based on the relevant literature, Niebuhr’s intellectual autobiography, and his wife’s, Ursula’s Niebuhr statements – has had a significant influence on his thought. In a private letter, Niebuhr called himself a “critical student of Augustine.” This dissertation aims to fill a theoretical gap through a systematic elaboration and evaluation of Niebuhr’s interpretation of Augustine. The dissertation – by overviewing Niebuhr’s scholarly work – presents how Niebuhr interpreted Augustine and his ideas. The focus is on the content and context of Niebuhr’s thoughts on Augustine and his ideas, the different characteristics of Niebuhr’s theoretical phases, the reasons for changes, and the overall picture. The main body of the research is based on primary sources from Niebuhr; nineteen books were processed, most of which are monographs or compilations of essays and sermons. The initial novelty of the dissertation lies in the systematic effort to understand Niebuhr’s interpretation of Augustine throughout his life and scholarship. It also shortly refers to the gravest misunderstandings of Niebuhr’s interpretation of Augustine. Furthermore, it seriously considers the numerous influences (theoretical and historical) that changed Niebuhr’s perspective on Augustine (for instance, Charles Norris Cochrane’s impact). Ultimately, the incessant focus on the chronological aspect helped formulate grounded conclusions connected to Augustine, for instance, in the case of Christian realism.
Title: „A Critical Student of Augustine” – Reinhold Niebuhr’s Interpretation of Augustine
Description:
In the past half-century, the American social sciences have been eager to research Reinhold Niebuhr’s ideas.
Most current works on Niebuhr deal with either what Niebuhr thought or its contemporary consequences.
This has distracted the attention from the “sources” of Niebuhr, namely, what kind of theoretical influences affected him while shaping his political thought.
This objection is valid even in the case of (Saint) Augustine (354-430), who – based on the relevant literature, Niebuhr’s intellectual autobiography, and his wife’s, Ursula’s Niebuhr statements – has had a significant influence on his thought.
In a private letter, Niebuhr called himself a “critical student of Augustine.
” This dissertation aims to fill a theoretical gap through a systematic elaboration and evaluation of Niebuhr’s interpretation of Augustine.
The dissertation – by overviewing Niebuhr’s scholarly work – presents how Niebuhr interpreted Augustine and his ideas.
The focus is on the content and context of Niebuhr’s thoughts on Augustine and his ideas, the different characteristics of Niebuhr’s theoretical phases, the reasons for changes, and the overall picture.
The main body of the research is based on primary sources from Niebuhr; nineteen books were processed, most of which are monographs or compilations of essays and sermons.
The initial novelty of the dissertation lies in the systematic effort to understand Niebuhr’s interpretation of Augustine throughout his life and scholarship.
It also shortly refers to the gravest misunderstandings of Niebuhr’s interpretation of Augustine.
Furthermore, it seriously considers the numerous influences (theoretical and historical) that changed Niebuhr’s perspective on Augustine (for instance, Charles Norris Cochrane’s impact).
Ultimately, the incessant focus on the chronological aspect helped formulate grounded conclusions connected to Augustine, for instance, in the case of Christian realism.
Related Results
HENRY NELSON WIEMAN ON RELIGION AND REINHOLD NIEBUHR
HENRY NELSON WIEMAN ON RELIGION AND REINHOLD NIEBUHR
Henry Nelson Wieman and Reinhold Niebuhr were theologically poles apart—Wieman a “new naturalist” and Niebuhr a “new super naturalist”—according to Wieman's nomenclature. Wieman de...
John Dewey
John Dewey
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the relationship between the American philosopher John Dewey and the theologian Reinhold Niebuhr. Although a generation apart in age...
Ecclesiology
Ecclesiology
Abstract
This essay argues that Reinhold Niebuhr had a rich and theologically informed ecclesiology. The argument begins by briefly considering criticisms of Niebuhr...
Niebuhr, Reinhold (1892–1971)
Niebuhr, Reinhold (1892–1971)
Reinhold Niebuhr is widely regarded as the foremost public theologian in twentieth-century America. A ‘public’ theologian is one who is responsive to the biblical tradition and res...
Responsibility
Responsibility
Abstract
This chapter explores the importance of moral responsibility in Reinhold Niebuhr’s thought, which in turn allows the reader to interpret his work within the...
Karl Barth
Karl Barth
Abstract
Reinhold Niebuhr and Karl Barth lived remarkably parallel lives. Both became disillusioned with the nineteenth-century Protestant liberalism they had inheri...
H. Richard Niebuhr
H. Richard Niebuhr
Abstract
After their famous clash over the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1932, Reinhold and H. Richard Niebuhr resolved never to criticize one another in such a ...
Reinhold Niebuhr
Reinhold Niebuhr
Abstract
Despite his sharp criticism of Niebuhr in With the Grain of the Universe, the author of this chapter has a high estimate of Niebuhr’s legacy and of the Jame...

