Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Is Well-Being Measurable?

View through CrossRef
Among the scientists and policymakers, measurability of well-being is now almost uncontroversial—only the individual measures are. Philosopher Daniel Hausman, however, argues that well-being in the proper sense is too person-relative and hence heterogeneous. It is not a quantity that can be measured on the population level. This chapter agrees that there is a sense of well-being—the all-things-considered individual well-being—on which it is likely not measurable but disagrees that therefore well-being is not measurable in any sense. Crucial to measurement is the existence of generalisations between core components of well-being and observable indicators. Such generalisations are available if well-being is predicated of kinds of people, rather than of individual lives. Assuming this focus on well-being of kinds, validity of most existing measures of well-being is secured by the process of construct validation, whose logic relies on a plausible ideal of balancing all evidence.
Title: Is Well-Being Measurable?
Description:
Among the scientists and policymakers, measurability of well-being is now almost uncontroversial—only the individual measures are.
Philosopher Daniel Hausman, however, argues that well-being in the proper sense is too person-relative and hence heterogeneous.
It is not a quantity that can be measured on the population level.
This chapter agrees that there is a sense of well-being—the all-things-considered individual well-being—on which it is likely not measurable but disagrees that therefore well-being is not measurable in any sense.
Crucial to measurement is the existence of generalisations between core components of well-being and observable indicators.
Such generalisations are available if well-being is predicated of kinds of people, rather than of individual lives.
Assuming this focus on well-being of kinds, validity of most existing measures of well-being is secured by the process of construct validation, whose logic relies on a plausible ideal of balancing all evidence.

Related Results

Being and Nothing
Being and Nothing
In this masterful work, leading German philosopher Lorenz B. Puntel answers the primordial question of philosophy: "Why is there Being at all and not absolutely nothing?" ...
Well-Being and Morality
Well-Being and Morality
Abstract Does human well-being consist in pleasure, the satisfaction of desires, or some set of goods such as knowledge, friendship, and accomplishment? Does being m...
Conclusion
Conclusion
I conclude this book by summarizing the two most crucial points for which I have argued.First, most perfect being theists take it for granted that the perfect being thesis, i.e. th...
Introduction
Introduction
One of the oldest questions in metaphysics concerns not the various natures of beings but rather the nature of being itself: is being unitary or does being fragment? The primary ai...
Extended Preferences
Extended Preferences
This chapter presents a methodology for constructing an interpersonally comparable measure of individual well-being, the “extended preferences” approach. It builds upon John Harsan...
Introduction
Introduction
What are the methodologies that we should employ for designing and evaluating governmental policy, in light of the profound effects that policies have on the level and distribution...
Introduction
Introduction
The Introduction explains how the author’s fascination with the ontological argument for perfect being theism has motivated him to write this book. It then defines perfect being th...
On Product Measures Associated with Stationary Processes
On Product Measures Associated with Stationary Processes
This article considers the connections between product measures and stationary processes. It first provides an overview of historical facts and relevant terminology, basic concepts...

Back to Top