Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Confronting with the Prosecution

View through CrossRef
Confronting criminal investigation activity cannot always be qualified as illegal activity of some participants in the criminal process. The right to defense in the criminal process is a tool through which the defense side can try to confront the course of the criminal prosecution or redirect it in a convenient way. The possibilities granted by the law to the defense party, which aim to protect legitimate rights and interests, are also a legal tool to confront the criminal prosecution, provided by the legislator (the right of the suspect/accused to be assisted by a defense attorney, the right of the suspect/accused not to submit statements, the right to contest the actions of the criminal investigation body, the right to a legal representative, limitation of terms for applying preventive measures, etc.). A way provided by the law, by which the defense side can confront the activity of the criminal investigation body, would be the principle of adversariality in the criminal process. This principle of criminal procedural law, in essence, represents the legal basis for the confrontation with criminal prosecution activities (results of actions), which is obviously limited within an absolutely predefined framework of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Moldova. The essence of the principle of adversariality in the criminal prosecution phase implies that the criminal prosecution body "acts" (for example: forwards the accusation), and the defense side confronts it (for example, the accused submits statements by which he argues the non-recognition of the act or guilt). Therefore, the opposition and the pursuit of compliance by the criminal prosecution body with the legal regulations when carrying out criminal prosecution actions will also constitute, an element of the implementation of the principle of adversariality in the criminal prosecution phase and a way of legally confronting the criminal prosecution activity.
Title: Confronting with the Prosecution
Description:
Confronting criminal investigation activity cannot always be qualified as illegal activity of some participants in the criminal process.
The right to defense in the criminal process is a tool through which the defense side can try to confront the course of the criminal prosecution or redirect it in a convenient way.
The possibilities granted by the law to the defense party, which aim to protect legitimate rights and interests, are also a legal tool to confront the criminal prosecution, provided by the legislator (the right of the suspect/accused to be assisted by a defense attorney, the right of the suspect/accused not to submit statements, the right to contest the actions of the criminal investigation body, the right to a legal representative, limitation of terms for applying preventive measures, etc.
).
A way provided by the law, by which the defense side can confront the activity of the criminal investigation body, would be the principle of adversariality in the criminal process.
This principle of criminal procedural law, in essence, represents the legal basis for the confrontation with criminal prosecution activities (results of actions), which is obviously limited within an absolutely predefined framework of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Moldova.
The essence of the principle of adversariality in the criminal prosecution phase implies that the criminal prosecution body "acts" (for example: forwards the accusation), and the defense side confronts it (for example, the accused submits statements by which he argues the non-recognition of the act or guilt).
Therefore, the opposition and the pursuit of compliance by the criminal prosecution body with the legal regulations when carrying out criminal prosecution actions will also constitute, an element of the implementation of the principle of adversariality in the criminal prosecution phase and a way of legally confronting the criminal prosecution activity.

Related Results

Prosecution Accountability and Judicial Review
Prosecution Accountability and Judicial Review
This article examines the various ways that prosecution decisions can be challenged and, in particular, the extent to which prosecution decisions might be susceptible to judicial r...
INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTION OF MACRO-CRIMES COMMITTED DURING THE THIRD ARTSAKH WAR
INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTION OF MACRO-CRIMES COMMITTED DURING THE THIRD ARTSAKH WAR
This article articulates the possible legal paths open to international criminal law in order to activate the prosecution of macro-crimes committed during the Third Artsakh War. Ne...
The “Kouwenhoven” Case
The “Kouwenhoven” Case
431 War and armed conflict — War crimes — Foreign amnesty laws — Scope — Effect of foreign amnesties on prosecution under Dutch law — War crimes committed in Se...
Preliminary investigation and invalidity of investigative actions
Preliminary investigation and invalidity of investigative actions
Abstract Time limits for preliminary investigation and it’s duration is part of the right to a regular legal process, provided for by Article 42 of the Constitution ...
Responding to elder abuse when the victim opposes prosecution
Responding to elder abuse when the victim opposes prosecution
Abstract This article explores the complexities of responding to elder abuse cases when victims oppose the prosecution of their abusers. What little published gui...
Effective Prosecution to Support Digital Forensic Evidence during Investigation and Court Proceedings
Effective Prosecution to Support Digital Forensic Evidence during Investigation and Court Proceedings
Firstly, the purpose of this work is to highlight the significance of digital evidence that exists in the form of digital data and is to be presented in court of law. Secondly, how...
Kekhususan dalam Tahapan Penyerahan Perkara di Peradilan Militer
Kekhususan dalam Tahapan Penyerahan Perkara di Peradilan Militer
Fields of law in Indonesia are a system that is interrelated and affects each other. That there are similarities and differences between each law, including in terms of its enforce...

Back to Top