Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Study on Offshore Skirt Penetration Using the Geocentrifuge
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The behaviour of deep skirts in clay has been stud, ied by performing centrifuge tests. A circular skirt pile with length 36 m, inside diameter 10.5 m and wall thickness 1.27 m was scaled 1:150 and 1:300. The tests involved installation in flight with a constant rate ofpenetration. The total force, friction force, the development of heave both in- and outside the skirt and generated excess pore pressures in the clay were measured both during penetration and dissipation afterwards. In-flight cone penetration tests were performed to determine the strength of the clay. The experimental results of force and heave have been compared with the results of the PIAPA computer program especially developed to predict the force and the heave during skirt penetration.
Introduction
Skirt foundations are often used underneath offshore platforms, when they are to be placed on soft soil. The soil in- and outside the skirt walls will rise (heave) when placing the skirt foundation. The penetration force and heave depend on the skirt geometry and soil properties and need to be known for the design of the platform. To investigate experimentally the fundamental mechanism and to verify calculation techniques, centrifuge tests were executed in the large Geo-centrifuge at Delft Geotechnics, described in [1]1. To this end, one idealized prototype skirt compartment was modelled and tested. In the centrifuge tests the model skirts were penetrated in flight in clay. Force and heave were measured. Excess pore pressures in the clay, generated by penetration, were also measured. After dissipation further penetration was included to measure the ultimate axial bearing capacity.
This paper will deal with a description of the models and the preparation of them together with the followed test procedure. The test results on force and heave obtained during the first penetration are presented and compared with results of calculations done with the program PIAPA. The calculation model on which the program is based is also described.
2 Description of the PIAPA program
The PIAPA program was developed specially for skirt penetration as it occurs during installation of an offshore platform. Therefore the capabilities of the program incorporate the calculation of the influence of different skirts sizes, etc. In the tests described in this paper there was only one compartment.
2.1 Calculation of penetration force
The total penetration force is calculated by adding the tip resistance force to the friction forces that develop at the sides of the skirt. The calculation of the tip force is based on the bearing capacity formula for purely cohesive materials.qt = Net * (1) Cu +q
Where qt is the local tip resistance, Nd the tip bearing capacity factor, c.. the undrained shear strength (cohesion) and q the overburden stress. The total platform tip resistance force is obtained by integration over the skirt tip area. The difference between PIAPA and most other programs is that account is taken of the extra vertical stress due to heave and friction. PIAPA enables the input of arbitrary cohesion, adhesion and weight profiles of the soil.
Title: Study on Offshore Skirt Penetration Using the Geocentrifuge
Description:
Abstract
The behaviour of deep skirts in clay has been stud, ied by performing centrifuge tests.
A circular skirt pile with length 36 m, inside diameter 10.
5 m and wall thickness 1.
27 m was scaled 1:150 and 1:300.
The tests involved installation in flight with a constant rate ofpenetration.
The total force, friction force, the development of heave both in- and outside the skirt and generated excess pore pressures in the clay were measured both during penetration and dissipation afterwards.
In-flight cone penetration tests were performed to determine the strength of the clay.
The experimental results of force and heave have been compared with the results of the PIAPA computer program especially developed to predict the force and the heave during skirt penetration.
Introduction
Skirt foundations are often used underneath offshore platforms, when they are to be placed on soft soil.
The soil in- and outside the skirt walls will rise (heave) when placing the skirt foundation.
The penetration force and heave depend on the skirt geometry and soil properties and need to be known for the design of the platform.
To investigate experimentally the fundamental mechanism and to verify calculation techniques, centrifuge tests were executed in the large Geo-centrifuge at Delft Geotechnics, described in [1]1.
To this end, one idealized prototype skirt compartment was modelled and tested.
In the centrifuge tests the model skirts were penetrated in flight in clay.
Force and heave were measured.
Excess pore pressures in the clay, generated by penetration, were also measured.
After dissipation further penetration was included to measure the ultimate axial bearing capacity.
This paper will deal with a description of the models and the preparation of them together with the followed test procedure.
The test results on force and heave obtained during the first penetration are presented and compared with results of calculations done with the program PIAPA.
The calculation model on which the program is based is also described.
2 Description of the PIAPA program
The PIAPA program was developed specially for skirt penetration as it occurs during installation of an offshore platform.
Therefore the capabilities of the program incorporate the calculation of the influence of different skirts sizes, etc.
In the tests described in this paper there was only one compartment.
2.
1 Calculation of penetration force
The total penetration force is calculated by adding the tip resistance force to the friction forces that develop at the sides of the skirt.
The calculation of the tip force is based on the bearing capacity formula for purely cohesive materials.
qt = Net * (1) Cu +q
Where qt is the local tip resistance, Nd the tip bearing capacity factor, c.
the undrained shear strength (cohesion) and q the overburden stress.
The total platform tip resistance force is obtained by integration over the skirt tip area.
The difference between PIAPA and most other programs is that account is taken of the extra vertical stress due to heave and friction.
PIAPA enables the input of arbitrary cohesion, adhesion and weight profiles of the soil.
Related Results
The Skirt Piled Gullfaks C Platform Installation
The Skirt Piled Gullfaks C Platform Installation
ABSTRACT
The Gullfaks C concrete platform was successfully installed on a soft soil site in 1989. This was the first time the new foundation concept of skirt pili...
Alternative Offshore Foundation Installation Methods
Alternative Offshore Foundation Installation Methods
Abstract
According to the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) in the first six months of 2012, Europe installed and fully grid connected 132 offshore wind tur...
Offshore Giant Fields, 1950-1990
Offshore Giant Fields, 1950-1990
ABSTRACT
OFFSHORE GIANT FIELDS
1950 - 1990
During the past forty years...
Floating LNG: New Rule Note for the Classification of LNG FPSO
Floating LNG: New Rule Note for the Classification of LNG FPSO
Abstract
Offshore LNG terminals are today broadly considered by the industry to respond to the world thirst of energy in a rapid and efficient manner. In order to...
Offshore geotechnical challenges of the energy transition
Offshore geotechnical challenges of the energy transition
Offshore wind is the most mature of the offshore renewable energy technologies and has a significant role to play in the energy transition. 2000 GW of offshore wind capacity is ant...
Coke Drum Skirt Life-Cycle Management
Coke Drum Skirt Life-Cycle Management
Abstract
Delayed coking is a form of thermal cracking used for processing “bottom barrel” residuum in a refinery delayed coking unit (DCU). Coke drums, which are key...
Offshore Exploration Potential
Offshore Exploration Potential
ABSTRACT
There are 799 indentified sedimentary provinces which possibly could contain hydrocarbons. Of these, 481 are located offshore or partly offshore. Eight o...
The Co-Saline Storage Method: Advanced Modeling to Accelerate Offshore CCS
The Co-Saline Storage Method: Advanced Modeling to Accelerate Offshore CCS
Abstract
Offshore locations present significant potential for geologic carbon storage (GCS). Key differences and benefits over onshore GCS include locations distal f...

