Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Protection of Witnesses and Whistleblowers in Corruption Crimes under Palestinian Law

View through CrossRef
The protection of whistleblowers and witnesses in corruption cases constitutes a cornerstone of an effective anti-corruption framework, as it enables individuals to report corrupt practices without fear of retaliation or harm, thereby strengthening integrity, transparency, and preventing perpetrators from escaping accountability. In the Palestinian context, a legislative framework emerged between 2010 and 2019 to regulate this aspect, culminating in Cabinet Decision No. (7) of 2019 on the Protection of Whistleblowers, Witnesses, Informants, and Experts in Corruption Cases. This regulation represented a significant step forward in providing legal, functional, and social safeguards. However, its practical implementation has revealed obstacles that undermine its effectiveness, due to legislative shortcomings and weak enforcement mechanisms. This necessitates an analytical study linking the legal provisions with their application in practice, while assessing their consistency with international standards, particularly the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC).  The study concludes that the Palestinian system partially aligns with these standards but requires further development of practical guarantees and an expansion of protection to cover all stages of legal proceedings. It also emphasizes the need to strengthen institutional coordination and provide effective functional and social support.  The research recommends harmonizing national legislation with international standards to ensure comprehensive protection for whistleblowers and witnesses, thereby contributing to the consolidation of good governance principles.
Title: Protection of Witnesses and Whistleblowers in Corruption Crimes under Palestinian Law
Description:
The protection of whistleblowers and witnesses in corruption cases constitutes a cornerstone of an effective anti-corruption framework, as it enables individuals to report corrupt practices without fear of retaliation or harm, thereby strengthening integrity, transparency, and preventing perpetrators from escaping accountability.
In the Palestinian context, a legislative framework emerged between 2010 and 2019 to regulate this aspect, culminating in Cabinet Decision No.
(7) of 2019 on the Protection of Whistleblowers, Witnesses, Informants, and Experts in Corruption Cases.
This regulation represented a significant step forward in providing legal, functional, and social safeguards.
However, its practical implementation has revealed obstacles that undermine its effectiveness, due to legislative shortcomings and weak enforcement mechanisms.
This necessitates an analytical study linking the legal provisions with their application in practice, while assessing their consistency with international standards, particularly the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC).
  The study concludes that the Palestinian system partially aligns with these standards but requires further development of practical guarantees and an expansion of protection to cover all stages of legal proceedings.
It also emphasizes the need to strengthen institutional coordination and provide effective functional and social support.
  The research recommends harmonizing national legislation with international standards to ensure comprehensive protection for whistleblowers and witnesses, thereby contributing to the consolidation of good governance principles.

Related Results

Protection of Witnesses and Whistleblowers in Corruption Crimes under Palestinian Law
Protection of Witnesses and Whistleblowers in Corruption Crimes under Palestinian Law
The protection of whistleblowers and witnesses in corruption cases constitutes a cornerstone of an effective anti-corruption framework, as it enables individuals to report corrupt ...
Regulating the Acceptance of Witnesses in Corruption Cases within the Protection Program in the Saudi Law and its Obligations
Regulating the Acceptance of Witnesses in Corruption Cases within the Protection Program in the Saudi Law and its Obligations
In light of the  development of the means  of corruption crimes and the diversity of  their methods including the use of modern technology in these crimes, and based on  the growin...
The protection of whistleblowers in South African criminal cases
The protection of whistleblowers in South African criminal cases
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse the extent of protection available for whistleblowers in South African criminal cases. Design/methodology/approach This...
ON THE METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE CORRUPTION POTENTIAL OF LEGAL ACTS
ON THE METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE CORRUPTION POTENTIAL OF LEGAL ACTS
The article is devoted to the methodology for assessing legal acts for corruption, since the sphere where corruption originates and spreads, respectively, is legislation. Corrupti...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Obligation to Combat Corruption as Erga Omnes Obligation in Customary International Law and Jus Cogens
Obligation to Combat Corruption as Erga Omnes Obligation in Customary International Law and Jus Cogens
Obligation to Combat Corruption as Erga Omnes Obligation in Customary International Law and Jus Cogens In the era of globalization, international trade and cooperation, t...
UPAYA PENANGKAPAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG KABUR KE LUAR NEGERI
UPAYA PENANGKAPAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG KABUR KE LUAR NEGERI
This research was conducted with the aim of unraveling the efforts that can be made in arresting corruption criminals who fled abroad. Using normative juridical research methods, t...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...

Back to Top