Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Distance Visual Acuity Versus Near Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Purpose: To measure and compare distance and near visual acuity in amblyopic patients.Methods: This study was evaluated 167 patients with amblyopia between ages of 6 and 55 years. In all subjects, a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and funduscopy was performed. Distance visual acuity (DVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 4 m and near visual acuity (NVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 40 cm, and then DVA and NVA were compered and analyzed.Results:In our subjects, the mean distance and near visual acuity was 0.39± 0.30 log MAR and 0.30± 0.32 log MAR respectively. The mean NVA was 0.12±0.12 log MAR better than DVA and difference between them was statistically significant (P<0.001). In 40% of patients, there were no difference between DVA and NVA, and in 60% of them, NVA was 0.1 or more log MAR better than DVA. The difference between DVA and NVA was not significantly related with age (p=0.225), spherical equivalent (P=.820) and strabismus (P=.336) and type of amblyopia (P=.405). Although all of these subjects had subnormal DVA, but 43 subjects (26%) had normal NVA. In mild and moderate amblyopic groups, difference between DVA and NVA was 0.14±0.10 log MAR and 0.15±0.14 log MAR respectively, but in severe amblyopic group it was 0.03±0.08 log MAR. The difference between DVA and NVA showed a significant relation with severity of amblyopia (P<0.001). The difference between DVA and NVA was 0.16±0.11 log MAR in patients with history of amblyopia therapy and 0.07.± 0.11 log MAR in patients without treatment. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).Conclusion: Our results showed that near visual acuity in amblyopia especially in mild to moderate types was significantly better than distance visual acuity. More than 50% of subjects with mild amblyopia had normal near visual acuity. The difference between DVA and NVA showed no relation with age, spherical equivalent, strabismus, and type of amblyopia. Also, difference between the DVA and NVA in patients with history of amblyopia therapy was better than of it in non-treated subjects.
Title: Distance Visual Acuity Versus Near Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.
Description:
Abstract
Purpose: To measure and compare distance and near visual acuity in amblyopic patients.
Methods: This study was evaluated 167 patients with amblyopia between ages of 6 and 55 years.
In all subjects, a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and funduscopy was performed.
Distance visual acuity (DVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 4 m and near visual acuity (NVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 40 cm, and then DVA and NVA were compered and analyzed.
Results:In our subjects, the mean distance and near visual acuity was 0.
39± 0.
30 log MAR and 0.
30± 0.
32 log MAR respectively.
The mean NVA was 0.
12±0.
12 log MAR better than DVA and difference between them was statistically significant (P<0.
001).
In 40% of patients, there were no difference between DVA and NVA, and in 60% of them, NVA was 0.
1 or more log MAR better than DVA.
The difference between DVA and NVA was not significantly related with age (p=0.
225), spherical equivalent (P=.
820) and strabismus (P=.
336) and type of amblyopia (P=.
405).
Although all of these subjects had subnormal DVA, but 43 subjects (26%) had normal NVA.
In mild and moderate amblyopic groups, difference between DVA and NVA was 0.
14±0.
10 log MAR and 0.
15±0.
14 log MAR respectively, but in severe amblyopic group it was 0.
03±0.
08 log MAR.
The difference between DVA and NVA showed a significant relation with severity of amblyopia (P<0.
001).
The difference between DVA and NVA was 0.
16±0.
11 log MAR in patients with history of amblyopia therapy and 0.
07.
± 0.
11 log MAR in patients without treatment.
This difference was statistically significant (P<0.
001).
Conclusion: Our results showed that near visual acuity in amblyopia especially in mild to moderate types was significantly better than distance visual acuity.
More than 50% of subjects with mild amblyopia had normal near visual acuity.
The difference between DVA and NVA showed no relation with age, spherical equivalent, strabismus, and type of amblyopia.
Also, difference between the DVA and NVA in patients with history of amblyopia therapy was better than of it in non-treated subjects.
Related Results
Frequency and Causes of Uniocular Amblyopia in Children
Frequency and Causes of Uniocular Amblyopia in Children
Aim: To determine the frequency and causes of uniocular amblyopia in children age 6-14 years visiting a tertiary care hospital.
Study Design: Cross-sectional hospital based study.
...
Non-Interactive Amblyopia Treatment Modalities in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Non-Interactive Amblyopia Treatment Modalities in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Recently, a number of clinical trials are conducting on amblyopia treatments. Discovering an intervention that provides optimal outcome with minimal su...
A STUDY OF MAGNITUDE OF ANISOMETROPIA AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH AMBLYOPIA IN SCHOOL GOING CHILDREN
A STUDY OF MAGNITUDE OF ANISOMETROPIA AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH AMBLYOPIA IN SCHOOL GOING CHILDREN
BACKGROUND: Visual impairment is a common handicap among school going children. In some, there are signicant interocular differences in
refractive error (ANISOMETROPIA), which can...
Effectiveness of Kanna photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors
Effectiveness of Kanna photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors
Purpose:
Amblyopia is a significant public health problem. Photoscreeners have been shown to have significant potential for screening; however, most are limited by cost...
4 Week’s Report for Virtual Reality on Children Amblyopia Therapy
4 Week’s Report for Virtual Reality on Children Amblyopia Therapy
Purpose: To compare safety and Visual Acuity (VA) improvement in children with amblyopia treated with Virtual Reality (VR) plus spectacle correction and patching versus. spectacle ...
Near and Distance Stereoacuity in Hyperopic Anisometropic Amblyopia Patients Treated after 6 Years of Age
Near and Distance Stereoacuity in Hyperopic Anisometropic Amblyopia Patients Treated after 6 Years of Age
Abstract
Background Hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia is considered to have worse prognosis in stereoacuity especially when the treatment is begun at late childhood. The pr...
Clinical results according to cause of endophthalmitis
Clinical results according to cause of endophthalmitis
AbstractPurposeTo analysis clinical features according to the cause of endophthalmitis and evaluate the factors associated with final visual acuity.MethodsWe retrospectively review...
Visual Functional Limitation in Amblyopia: A Review
Visual Functional Limitation in Amblyopia: A Review
Amblyopia is a unilateral or bilateral reduction in visual acuity in absence of any pathological causes. It results in limitations of various visual functions including visual acui...

