Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluation of malingering
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Malingering is defined as the deliberate production of symptoms of mental illness, with a clear external incentive. It may also be an environment-driven adaptive mechanism. In the carceral setting, malingering often proves challenging. Presentation may differ, detection strategies used elsewhere may not work in carceral settings, and inaccurate determinations may have serious consequences. Diagnosing malingering requires a thorough knowledge of genuine mental illness, a systematic approach to evaluation, identification of objective indicators, and the use of scientifically validated psychological tests when necessary. It is important that carceral clinicians investigate possibilities such as factitious disorder, dissimulation, and false imputation. Carceral clinicians must be aware of their own misassumptions and biases about incarcerated persons’ response styles, particularly in settings where incarcerated persons may have to convey their symptoms more forcefully to receive needed care. The finding that an incarcerated person has malingered symptoms does not rule out the presence of true mental illness, and a determination of malingering should not exclude the individual from receiving needed mental health services.
Oxford University PressNew York
Title: Evaluation of malingering
Description:
Abstract
Malingering is defined as the deliberate production of symptoms of mental illness, with a clear external incentive.
It may also be an environment-driven adaptive mechanism.
In the carceral setting, malingering often proves challenging.
Presentation may differ, detection strategies used elsewhere may not work in carceral settings, and inaccurate determinations may have serious consequences.
Diagnosing malingering requires a thorough knowledge of genuine mental illness, a systematic approach to evaluation, identification of objective indicators, and the use of scientifically validated psychological tests when necessary.
It is important that carceral clinicians investigate possibilities such as factitious disorder, dissimulation, and false imputation.
Carceral clinicians must be aware of their own misassumptions and biases about incarcerated persons’ response styles, particularly in settings where incarcerated persons may have to convey their symptoms more forcefully to receive needed care.
The finding that an incarcerated person has malingered symptoms does not rule out the presence of true mental illness, and a determination of malingering should not exclude the individual from receiving needed mental health services.
Related Results
Neuropsychological Malingering Determination: The Illusion of Scientific Lie Detection
Neuropsychological Malingering Determination: The Illusion of Scientific Lie Detection
Humans believe that other humans lie, especially when stakes are high. Stakes can be very high in a courtroom, from substantial amounts of monetary damages in civil litigation to l...
Psychological assessment of malingering in psychogenic neurological disorders and non‐psychogenic neurological disorders: relationship to psychopathology levels
Psychological assessment of malingering in psychogenic neurological disorders and non‐psychogenic neurological disorders: relationship to psychopathology levels
Background and purpose: It remains unknown whether psychological distress causes malingering in patients with psychogenic symptoms.Methods: We studied 26 patients with psychogeni...
Malingering: Forensic Evaluations
Malingering: Forensic Evaluations
AbstractMalingering for the purposes of evading criminal prosecution or obtaining drugs is commonly seen in forensic settings, and forensic mental health clinicians often face diff...
DIAGNOSING OCULAR MALINGERING IN CHILDREN WITH SIMPLE TEST: IS IT POSSIBLE?
DIAGNOSING OCULAR MALINGERING IN CHILDREN WITH SIMPLE TEST: IS IT POSSIBLE?
Introduction : Malingering is a condition in children which need a thorough and meticulous examination to diagnose the condition. According to several publication, simple test can ...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract
The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Use of the TOMM in a Criminal Court Forensic Assessment Setting
Use of the TOMM in a Criminal Court Forensic Assessment Setting
Use of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in a criminal court forensic assessment setting was examined. Results indicated that those initially suspected of cognitive malingering...
A Critique of the Stenger Test
A Critique of the Stenger Test
Introduction: Most audiometers have an in-built “Stenger test” setting. The test is sometimes applied in cases of single-sided deafness as an indicator of malingering. Although tex...
Detecting Malingered Psychotic Symptoms With the Rorschach Projective Technique
Detecting Malingered Psychotic Symptoms With the Rorschach Projective Technique
Problem. Criminal defendants may be strongly motivated to avoid prosecution by appearing mentally ill, and the malingering of psychotic symptoms is of special concern in legal proc...

