Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Critique of the Stenger Test
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Most audiometers have an in-built “Stenger test” setting. The test is sometimes applied in cases of single-sided deafness as an indicator of malingering. Although textbooks have been written about it, the underlying conditions remain enigmatic. The literature usually points to psychological problems, pointing to the patient as having “nonorganic hearing loss”, “malingering”, “false and exaggerated hearing loss”, “hysterical hearing loss”, or “pseudohypoacusis”. These are all non-objective features without a sound scientific base, and the test tends to blame the patient for providing non-repeatable hearing thresholds. Methods: This opinion piece looks at the literature surrounding the Stenger test and the factors that might cause hearing threshold variability and concludes that the test has a subjective basis that makes it unscientific. In our opinion, we also think it is ethically questionable to blame the patient for malingering when there are non-repeatable findings. In order to make the test scientifically valid, we frame a testable hypothesis: that the Stenger effect could be due to unrecognised contraction of the middle ear muscles in response to stimulation of the contralateral (worse-hearing) ear. That is, we suppose that bilateral contraction impairs thresholds in both the good and poor ear, so the subject can no longer hear a tone in their good ear which they previously could when their audiogram was established monaurally. Thus, we make the case that the subject is not malingering—they genuinely cannot hear the test tones in either ear. Discussion and Conclusions: We believe it is incorrect to blame the patient when the problem may lie with incomplete understanding of how the auditory system functions bilaterally. The test needs to be objectively investigated and perhaps reinterpreted in terms of hearing sensitivity in one ear being reduced by sound levels in the contralateral ear. If this is not possible, we suggest it would be better if the Stenger test were abolished.
Title: A Critique of the Stenger Test
Description:
Introduction: Most audiometers have an in-built “Stenger test” setting.
The test is sometimes applied in cases of single-sided deafness as an indicator of malingering.
Although textbooks have been written about it, the underlying conditions remain enigmatic.
The literature usually points to psychological problems, pointing to the patient as having “nonorganic hearing loss”, “malingering”, “false and exaggerated hearing loss”, “hysterical hearing loss”, or “pseudohypoacusis”.
These are all non-objective features without a sound scientific base, and the test tends to blame the patient for providing non-repeatable hearing thresholds.
Methods: This opinion piece looks at the literature surrounding the Stenger test and the factors that might cause hearing threshold variability and concludes that the test has a subjective basis that makes it unscientific.
In our opinion, we also think it is ethically questionable to blame the patient for malingering when there are non-repeatable findings.
In order to make the test scientifically valid, we frame a testable hypothesis: that the Stenger effect could be due to unrecognised contraction of the middle ear muscles in response to stimulation of the contralateral (worse-hearing) ear.
That is, we suppose that bilateral contraction impairs thresholds in both the good and poor ear, so the subject can no longer hear a tone in their good ear which they previously could when their audiogram was established monaurally.
Thus, we make the case that the subject is not malingering—they genuinely cannot hear the test tones in either ear.
Discussion and Conclusions: We believe it is incorrect to blame the patient when the problem may lie with incomplete understanding of how the auditory system functions bilaterally.
The test needs to be objectively investigated and perhaps reinterpreted in terms of hearing sensitivity in one ear being reduced by sound levels in the contralateral ear.
If this is not possible, we suggest it would be better if the Stenger test were abolished.
Related Results
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Stenger, Gerhardt. Le Triomphe des lumières. Perrin, 2024
Stenger, Gerhardt. Le Triomphe des lumières. Perrin, 2024
Résumé: Published in 2024, this book is one among a series of current reappraisals concerning the Enlightenment (Antoine Lilti or Robert Darnton, for instance) to question the impa...
The Virtualization of Elián González
The Virtualization of Elián González
For seven months in 1999/2000, six-year old Cuban Elián González was embroiled in a family feud plotted along rival national and ideological lines, and relayed televisually as soap...
L'amitié et la critique : une recomposition du voyage de Miguel Abensour à la terra incognita de la pensée de l'amitié
L'amitié et la critique : une recomposition du voyage de Miguel Abensour à la terra incognita de la pensée de l'amitié
L'expression « pensée critique » est devenue un lieu commun, avec des contours pourtant tout à fait ambigus, où convergent intentions académiques, institutionnels et, grosso modo, ...
Éthique de la critique littéraire : l'"ethos" de Roland Barthes
Éthique de la critique littéraire : l'"ethos" de Roland Barthes
Le texte déclenché par une œuvre littéraire est un discours de second degré, mais son scripteur peut n’être pas de second ordre. Je cherche à rendre compte des gestes de la critiqu...
Religion as Critique
Religion as Critique
Irfan Ahmad makes the far-reaching argument that potent systems and modes for self-critique as well as critique of others are inherent in Islam—indeed, critique is integral to its ...
To Assess the Effectiveness of Hypertonic Saline Nebulized Suctioning On Airway Clearance Among Patients On Mechanical Ventilator In Selected Hospitals
To Assess the Effectiveness of Hypertonic Saline Nebulized Suctioning On Airway Clearance Among Patients On Mechanical Ventilator In Selected Hospitals
OBJECTIVES- 1) To assess the airway clearance of patients on mechanical ventilator in experimental and control group in selected hospitals. 2) To assess the effectiveness of hypert...
Théorie critique et modernité négro-africaine
Théorie critique et modernité négro-africaine
Dans ce climat général d'anesthésie contemporaine, dans la course à l'informatisation et à la recrudescence du religieux cachant mal des modes de pensée autoritaires, dans le cynis...

