Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Infants and Adults Are Sensitive to the Costs of Upright Versus Non‐Upright Locomotion
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Variety in locomotor forms—upright (e.g., walking) versus non‐upright (e.g., crawling)—reflects a “decision” about how to move. A decision about whether to move upright or non‐upright reflects the costs incurred from getting into and moving in a particular posture—energy, stability, time, comfort, and so on. Are infants and caregivers sensitive to the immediate costs of upright and non‐upright locomotion? We tested bout‐level sensitivity to the costs of locomotor form in groups with different locomotor skills and body size (24 crawling and 24 walking infants and their caregivers). To encourage both short and long bouts, dyads played with toys clustered in a pile and toys dispersed around the room. Most critically, all groups showed bout‐level sensitivity to the costs of upright and non‐upright locomotion—they factored in their starting posture, typical mode of locomotion, and travel distance when deciding how to move. Walkers and caregivers only moved non‐upright if they were already seated and traveled short distances; otherwise, they walked. Conversely, crawlers only moved upright if they were already standing and traveled short distances; if they were seated or moved long distances, they crawled. Moreover, across toy conditions, crawlers moved less than walkers and caregivers moved less than infants. Both crawlers and walkers displayed longer bouts when toys were dispersed, and caregivers mirrored their infants’ activity. Thus, despite infants’ propensity to move, babies—like adults—are indeed sensitive to the costs of upright versus non‐upright locomotion.
Summary
Infants and caregivers showed bout‐level sensitivity to locomotor costs by accounting for starting posture and travel distance when deciding whether to move upright or non‐upright.
Walkers and caregivers crawled when starting non‐upright and traveling short distances; otherwise, they walked. Crawlers walked when starting upright and traveling nearby; otherwise, they crawled.
Infants and caregivers moved more when toys were dispersed than when toys were clustered. Walkers moved more than crawlers, and infants moved more than caregivers.
Despite infants’ willingness to accumulate large amounts of seemingly gratuitous locomotion, infants, like adults, are sensitive to the varying, dynamic costs of different locomotor forms.
Title: Infants and Adults Are Sensitive to the Costs of Upright Versus Non‐Upright Locomotion
Description:
ABSTRACT
Variety in locomotor forms—upright (e.
g.
, walking) versus non‐upright (e.
g.
, crawling)—reflects a “decision” about how to move.
A decision about whether to move upright or non‐upright reflects the costs incurred from getting into and moving in a particular posture—energy, stability, time, comfort, and so on.
Are infants and caregivers sensitive to the immediate costs of upright and non‐upright locomotion? We tested bout‐level sensitivity to the costs of locomotor form in groups with different locomotor skills and body size (24 crawling and 24 walking infants and their caregivers).
To encourage both short and long bouts, dyads played with toys clustered in a pile and toys dispersed around the room.
Most critically, all groups showed bout‐level sensitivity to the costs of upright and non‐upright locomotion—they factored in their starting posture, typical mode of locomotion, and travel distance when deciding how to move.
Walkers and caregivers only moved non‐upright if they were already seated and traveled short distances; otherwise, they walked.
Conversely, crawlers only moved upright if they were already standing and traveled short distances; if they were seated or moved long distances, they crawled.
Moreover, across toy conditions, crawlers moved less than walkers and caregivers moved less than infants.
Both crawlers and walkers displayed longer bouts when toys were dispersed, and caregivers mirrored their infants’ activity.
Thus, despite infants’ propensity to move, babies—like adults—are indeed sensitive to the costs of upright versus non‐upright locomotion.
Summary
Infants and caregivers showed bout‐level sensitivity to locomotor costs by accounting for starting posture and travel distance when deciding whether to move upright or non‐upright.
Walkers and caregivers crawled when starting non‐upright and traveling short distances; otherwise, they walked.
Crawlers walked when starting upright and traveling nearby; otherwise, they crawled.
Infants and caregivers moved more when toys were dispersed than when toys were clustered.
Walkers moved more than crawlers, and infants moved more than caregivers.
Despite infants’ willingness to accumulate large amounts of seemingly gratuitous locomotion, infants, like adults, are sensitive to the varying, dynamic costs of different locomotor forms.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Integration of sound and locomotion information by auditory cortical neuronal ensembles
Integration of sound and locomotion information by auditory cortical neuronal ensembles
AbstractThe ability to process and act upon incoming sounds during locomotion is critical for survival. Intriguingly, sound responses of auditory cortical neurons are on average we...
A Study on the Difference in Aging Characteristics of Sensitive and Non‐Sensitive Skin
A Study on the Difference in Aging Characteristics of Sensitive and Non‐Sensitive Skin
ABSTRACTBackgroundAccording to Euromonitor and T Mall data statistics from 2017 to 2022, the Chinese market for sensitive skin (SS) skincare is growing by 20% every year, and anti‐...
Encoding of locomotion kinematics in the mouse cerebellum
Encoding of locomotion kinematics in the mouse cerebellum
AbstractThe cerebellum has a well-established role in locomotion control, but how the cerebellar network regulates locomotion behaviour is still not well understood. We therefore c...
Rodnoosjetljiv jezik na primjeru njemačkih časopisa Brigitte i Der Spiegel
Rodnoosjetljiv jezik na primjeru njemačkih časopisa Brigitte i Der Spiegel
On the basis of the comparative analysis of texts of the German biweekly magazine Brigitte and the weekly magazine Der Spiegel and under the presumption that gender-sensitive langu...
Abstract 11616: Seizures in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease
Abstract 11616: Seizures in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease
Background:
Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) may have an increased risk to develop seizures during hospitalization.
Objecti...
Impact of Gestational Age on Neonatal Hearing Screening in Vaginally-Born Late-Preterm and Early-Term Infants
Impact of Gestational Age on Neonatal Hearing Screening in Vaginally-Born Late-Preterm and Early-Term Infants
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Late-preterm and early-term (LP-ET) infants, defined herein as 35⁰-37<sup>6</sup> weeks' gestation, often fa...
Effects of preterm birth and bronchopulmonary dysplasia on infants’ pulmonary function: A cohort study of 117 infants
Effects of preterm birth and bronchopulmonary dysplasia on infants’ pulmonary function: A cohort study of 117 infants
Abstract
Background
Despite improved preterm infant survival rates in recent years, the increasing prevalence of preterm birth requires ongoing attention to associated ris...

