Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

APPRAISAL ANALYSIS OF ROY SURYO’S DEFAMATION ACCUSATION TO EKO KUNTADHI AND MAZDJO PRAY

View through CrossRef
In 2021, the former Minister of Youth and Sports, Roy Suryo reported Eko Kuntadhi and Mazdjo Pray for a defamation case regarding the comments in their YouTube video. The former minister reported that the two had falsely accused him and defamed him regarding the hit-and-run case that he faced with the Indonesian actor Lucky Alamsyah in the same year. However, the case still did not reach any conclusions in 2022. This research then aims to investigate whether the video contains defamation to be considered a criminal case as claimed by the former minister. This study would employ the appraisal framework proposed by Martin and White (2005) in order to analyze the contents of the video, including the comments of Eko Kuntadhi and Mazdjo Pray. To help reach a deeper analysis, the study would also use the intertextuality of the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) by Reisigl and Wodak (2009). Both the appraisal and the Discourse-Historical Approach were applied to analyze the utterances made by the two in their video entitled EKO KUNTADHI & MAZDJO PRAY: DEWA PANCI BIKIN ULAH LAGI (PRA KONTRO #36). Findings indicate that Mazdjo Pray and Eko Kuntadhi have body-shamed Roy Suryo through mockery, particularly to his mustache through negative judgment. The duo also used mockery to link Roy Suryo’s mustache to his successful appointment as the Minister of Youth and Sports after succeeding both the official minister, Andi Mallarangeng, and his ad interim minister, Agung Laksono, citing that the only reason for his promotion was due to his mustaches’ likeness to that of Andi’s. The duo also made various comments regarding Roy Suryo’s activities on Twitter, citing that he often utilizes his technological skills only to analyze various pornographic contents to verify the actors and actresses portrayed. Meanwhile, the analysis indicates that the claims for defamation regarding the case are not to be found since the literature describing the events matches the statements.
Title: APPRAISAL ANALYSIS OF ROY SURYO’S DEFAMATION ACCUSATION TO EKO KUNTADHI AND MAZDJO PRAY
Description:
In 2021, the former Minister of Youth and Sports, Roy Suryo reported Eko Kuntadhi and Mazdjo Pray for a defamation case regarding the comments in their YouTube video.
The former minister reported that the two had falsely accused him and defamed him regarding the hit-and-run case that he faced with the Indonesian actor Lucky Alamsyah in the same year.
However, the case still did not reach any conclusions in 2022.
This research then aims to investigate whether the video contains defamation to be considered a criminal case as claimed by the former minister.
This study would employ the appraisal framework proposed by Martin and White (2005) in order to analyze the contents of the video, including the comments of Eko Kuntadhi and Mazdjo Pray.
To help reach a deeper analysis, the study would also use the intertextuality of the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) by Reisigl and Wodak (2009).
Both the appraisal and the Discourse-Historical Approach were applied to analyze the utterances made by the two in their video entitled EKO KUNTADHI & MAZDJO PRAY: DEWA PANCI BIKIN ULAH LAGI (PRA KONTRO #36).
Findings indicate that Mazdjo Pray and Eko Kuntadhi have body-shamed Roy Suryo through mockery, particularly to his mustache through negative judgment.
The duo also used mockery to link Roy Suryo’s mustache to his successful appointment as the Minister of Youth and Sports after succeeding both the official minister, Andi Mallarangeng, and his ad interim minister, Agung Laksono, citing that the only reason for his promotion was due to his mustaches’ likeness to that of Andi’s.
The duo also made various comments regarding Roy Suryo’s activities on Twitter, citing that he often utilizes his technological skills only to analyze various pornographic contents to verify the actors and actresses portrayed.
Meanwhile, the analysis indicates that the claims for defamation regarding the case are not to be found since the literature describing the events matches the statements.

Related Results

Apsūdzība un tiesas spriešana kriminālprocesā: stabilais un mainīgais Kriminālprocesa likumā
Apsūdzība un tiesas spriešana kriminālprocesā: stabilais un mainīgais Kriminālprocesa likumā
The concept of accusation in the Latvian Criminal Procedure Law is applied inconsistently, encompassing multiple and functionally distinct meanings. It refers, at once, to a proced...
Defamation Law Basics: Understanding Slander and Libel in the Indian Perspective
Defamation Law Basics: Understanding Slander and Libel in the Indian Perspective
Defamation law in India addresses the protection of people's reputations against false and harmful statements, balancing this with the right to freedom of expression. This article ...
THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION – STILL DEFENSIBLE IN A MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?
THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION – STILL DEFENSIBLE IN A MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?
The crime of defamation, known as criminal libel in some jurisdictions, has (along with associated “insult laws”) been identified in the 2007 Declaration of Table Mountain of the W...
Successful Parallel Appraisal and Development in a Complicated Gas Cap Field, A Case Study
Successful Parallel Appraisal and Development in a Complicated Gas Cap Field, A Case Study
AbstractThis paper demonstrates successful application of parallel appraisal and development in G field, Niger. G field is a complicated stacked light oil reservoir with gas cap in...
THE CONSEQUENCES OF DEFAMATION IN HAMKA’S NOVEL TERUSIR
THE CONSEQUENCES OF DEFAMATION IN HAMKA’S NOVEL TERUSIR
Defamation is an act that harms an individual’s reputation through the spread of false statements. It is commonly categorized into two forms: libel, which involves written defamati...
Criminal Responsibility Of Defamation Under The Indonesian Criminal Law
Criminal Responsibility Of Defamation Under The Indonesian Criminal Law
The Research, "Responsibility of Defamation Actors in Indonesian Positive Law Studies" aims to describe the arrangements for criminal acts of defamation in the Indonesian criminal ...
Developing an Effective Employee Performance Appraisal System
Developing an Effective Employee Performance Appraisal System
This study focuses on developing an effective employee performance appraisal system and employees’ perception of justice with the appraisal outcome. The study tries to identify the...
Defamation in English and Arabic: A Pragmatic Contrastive Study
Defamation in English and Arabic: A Pragmatic Contrastive Study
Defamation is one of the verbal offences in which the plaintiff is accused of a certain wrongful act by one of the ways of publicity. If that wrongful act is proved, then the accus...

Back to Top