Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Defamation Law Basics: Understanding Slander and Libel in the Indian Perspective
View through CrossRef
Defamation law in India addresses the protection of people's reputations against false and harmful statements, balancing this with the right to freedom of expression. This article explores the distinctions between slander (spoken defamation) and slander (written or published defamation), and the legal
frameworks governing civil and criminal defamation in India. Examines the essential elements of defamation, such as falsehood, publication, harm and fault, and outlines key defences such as truth, good faith, public interest and privilege. Notable cases such as Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India and
Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu illustrate the judicial approach to defamation. The article also analyzes the impact of digital communication on defamation, addressing online defamation, jurisdictional challenges and the liability of intermediaries. Compares India's defamation law with that of other jurisdictions, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada, highlighting emerging trends such as digital defamation, the role of AI in content moderation and the importance of international cooperation. Ultimately, the article highlights the need for balanced defamation laws that protect
reputations while promoting freedom of expression in a rapidly evolving communications landscape.
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
Title: Defamation Law Basics: Understanding Slander and Libel in the Indian Perspective
Description:
Defamation law in India addresses the protection of people's reputations against false and harmful statements, balancing this with the right to freedom of expression.
This article explores the distinctions between slander (spoken defamation) and slander (written or published defamation), and the legal
frameworks governing civil and criminal defamation in India.
Examines the essential elements of defamation, such as falsehood, publication, harm and fault, and outlines key defences such as truth, good faith, public interest and privilege.
Notable cases such as Subramanian Swamy v.
Union of India and
Rajagopal v.
State of Tamil Nadu illustrate the judicial approach to defamation.
The article also analyzes the impact of digital communication on defamation, addressing online defamation, jurisdictional challenges and the liability of intermediaries.
Compares India's defamation law with that of other jurisdictions, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada, highlighting emerging trends such as digital defamation, the role of AI in content moderation and the importance of international cooperation.
Ultimately, the article highlights the need for balanced defamation laws that protect
reputations while promoting freedom of expression in a rapidly evolving communications landscape.
Related Results
THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION – STILL DEFENSIBLE IN A MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?
THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION – STILL DEFENSIBLE IN A MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?
The crime of defamation, known as criminal libel in some jurisdictions, has (along with associated “insult laws”) been identified in the 2007 Declaration of Table Mountain of the W...
Crimes of Electronic Defamation, Libel, and Slander under Jordanian Cybercrimes Law
Crimes of Electronic Defamation, Libel, and Slander under Jordanian Cybercrimes Law
This article aims to examine how the Jordanian Cybercrimes Law (No. 27 of 2015) addresses the crimes of electronic defamation, libel, and slander, to develop a better understanding...
THE CONSEQUENCES OF DEFAMATION IN HAMKA’S NOVEL TERUSIR
THE CONSEQUENCES OF DEFAMATION IN HAMKA’S NOVEL TERUSIR
Defamation is an act that harms an individual’s reputation through the spread of false statements. It is commonly categorized into two forms: libel, which involves written defamati...
Criminal Responsibility Of Defamation Under The Indonesian Criminal Law
Criminal Responsibility Of Defamation Under The Indonesian Criminal Law
The Research, "Responsibility of Defamation Actors in Indonesian Positive Law Studies" aims to describe the arrangements for criminal acts of defamation in the Indonesian criminal ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Waging Wars with Words – Libel and Slander in the Polish Statutory Law and English Common Law
Waging Wars with Words – Libel and Slander in the Polish Statutory Law and English Common Law
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the differences between the concepts of libel and slander as understood by the Polish statutory and English common law. As...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
ABSTRACT
This dissertation examines Paul’s view of the law in Romans, interacting with modern exegetical traditions addressing the Old, New, and Radical New Perspectives, aiming to...

