Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Lavoisier writes to Fourcroy from prison

View through CrossRef
Abstract The principal architects of the ‘chemical revolution’ may well be said to have been Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794) and Antoine Francois Fourcroy (1755-1809). The former by the intuitive genius of his brain, the extraordinary manipulative skill of his hands and the impeccable logic of his mind elaborated and set forth those truths on which modem chemistry was founded. The latter used his ingratiating and flexible personality, oratorical ability and facile pen to publicize the new chemistry and see that it was embodied in the educational curriculum. Lavoisier helped Fourcroy during his earlier years and used his prestige and influence to advance the younger man and obtain financial preferment for him. Under the ancien régime Lavoisier was rich, respected and influential; Fourcroy led a struggling existence for many years. The French Revolution was to bring Lavoisier misery and legal assassination; the same period saw Fourcroy’s prestige and power rise to a maximum. The relationship existing between the two men presents an as yet unsolved puzzle. Fourcroy’s biography still has to be written, as does an authoritative one of Lavoisier, when all the material is available. The latter’s standard biographer, Edouard Grimaux, wrote three-quarters of a century ago and his work needs to be superseded by an objective and fully documented modern study. Grimaux strongly condemned Fourcroy for allowing Lavoisier to be sent to the guillotine and implies that, possibly motivated by jealousy, he may have helped to speed him on his way. Modern scholars are inclined to the opinion that Grimaux maligned Fourcroy unjustifiably. The charge, however, was evidently current shortly after Lavoisier’s death, for in a speech delivered only two years after the lamentable event Fourcroy felt constrained to defend himself against an accusation which was to haunt him for the rest of his days and pursue him from his own death until the present day.
Title: Lavoisier writes to Fourcroy from prison
Description:
Abstract The principal architects of the ‘chemical revolution’ may well be said to have been Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794) and Antoine Francois Fourcroy (1755-1809).
The former by the intuitive genius of his brain, the extraordinary manipulative skill of his hands and the impeccable logic of his mind elaborated and set forth those truths on which modem chemistry was founded.
The latter used his ingratiating and flexible personality, oratorical ability and facile pen to publicize the new chemistry and see that it was embodied in the educational curriculum.
Lavoisier helped Fourcroy during his earlier years and used his prestige and influence to advance the younger man and obtain financial preferment for him.
Under the ancien régime Lavoisier was rich, respected and influential; Fourcroy led a struggling existence for many years.
The French Revolution was to bring Lavoisier misery and legal assassination; the same period saw Fourcroy’s prestige and power rise to a maximum.
The relationship existing between the two men presents an as yet unsolved puzzle.
Fourcroy’s biography still has to be written, as does an authoritative one of Lavoisier, when all the material is available.
The latter’s standard biographer, Edouard Grimaux, wrote three-quarters of a century ago and his work needs to be superseded by an objective and fully documented modern study.
Grimaux strongly condemned Fourcroy for allowing Lavoisier to be sent to the guillotine and implies that, possibly motivated by jealousy, he may have helped to speed him on his way.
Modern scholars are inclined to the opinion that Grimaux maligned Fourcroy unjustifiably.
The charge, however, was evidently current shortly after Lavoisier’s death, for in a speech delivered only two years after the lamentable event Fourcroy felt constrained to defend himself against an accusation which was to haunt him for the rest of his days and pursue him from his own death until the present day.

Related Results

The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash ABSTRACT The current incarceration facilities for the growing number of women are depriving expecting mothers of adequate care cruci...
Warszawska konspiracja więzienna 1939-1944 (udział polskiego personelu)
Warszawska konspiracja więzienna 1939-1944 (udział polskiego personelu)
Taken over by the Nazi in September 1939, Polish prisons became not only the gallows of many thousands of Poles but also the site of heroic struggle against the invaders ‒ a strugg...
Scrittura, sociabilità e strategie di persuasione : Marie-Anne Paulze-Lavoisier, secrétaire (1758-1836)
Scrittura, sociabilità e strategie di persuasione : Marie-Anne Paulze-Lavoisier, secrétaire (1758-1836)
Écriture, sociabilité et stratégies de persuasion : Marie-Anne Paulze-Lavoisier, secrétaire (1758-1836) À travers une étude de cas, centrée sur Marie-Anne Paulze-La...
Behind bars and under the influence: understanding substance use among prison inmates in Sri Lanka
Behind bars and under the influence: understanding substance use among prison inmates in Sri Lanka
Introduction: Substance use among prison inmates is a challenge for many countries around the world and this problem has imposed great waste of human, financial capital which leads...
Workshop: Better prison health for better public health
Workshop: Better prison health for better public health
Abstract According to the latest data, in 2018 about 590,000 people were held in prison on any given day in the EU, and more th...
From Nollet to Volta : Lavoisier and electricity / De Nollet à Volta : Lavoisier et l'électricité
From Nollet to Volta : Lavoisier and electricity / De Nollet à Volta : Lavoisier et l'électricité
RÉSUMÉ. — Tout au long de sa carrière scientifique, Lavoisier accorda une attention particulière à l'étude de l'électricité. Au début des années 1760, le chimiste français était pr...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash ABSTRACT Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Ethnography of Prison According to Parajanov
Ethnography of Prison According to Parajanov
In the article, the prison period of Sergei Parajanov’s art is examined – Parajanov served his sentence in 1973–1977 in the high security camps in Ukraine. Following the graphic wo...

Back to Top