Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The State of the Art in Evaluating the Performance of Assistant and Associate Deans as Seen by Deans and Assistant and Associate Deans

View through CrossRef
AbstractThis study explores the little‐understood process of evaluating the performance of assistant and associate deans at dental colleges in the United States and Canada. Specifically, this research aimed to identify the methods, processes, and outcomes related to the performance appraisals of assistant/associate deans. Both deans and assistant/associate deans were surveyed. Forty‐four of sixty‐six deans (66.7 percent) and 227 of 315 assistant/associate deans (72.1 percent) completed surveys with both close‐ended and open‐ended questions. In addition, ten individuals from each group were interviewed. Results indicate that 75–89 percent of assistant/associate deans are formally evaluated, although as many as 27 percent may lack formal job descriptions. Some recommended best practices for performance appraisal are being used in a majority of colleges. Examples of these best practices are having at least yearly appraisals, holding face‐to‐face meetings, and setting specific, personal performance objectives/benchmarks for assistant/associate deans. Still, there is much room to improve appraisals by incorporating other recommended practices. Relatively high levels of overall satisfaction were reported by both assistant/associate deans and deans for the process and outcomes of appraisals. Assistant/associate deans rated the value of appraisals to overall development lower than did deans. Qualitative data revealed definite opinions about what constitutes effective and ineffective appraisals, including the use of goal‐setting, timeliness, and necessary commitment. Several critical issues related to the results are discussed: differences in perspectives on performance reviews, the importance of informal feedback and job descriptions, the influence of an assistant/associate deans’ lack of tenure, and the length of service of deans. Lastly, recommendations for enhancing performance evaluations are offered.
Title: The State of the Art in Evaluating the Performance of Assistant and Associate Deans as Seen by Deans and Assistant and Associate Deans
Description:
AbstractThis study explores the little‐understood process of evaluating the performance of assistant and associate deans at dental colleges in the United States and Canada.
Specifically, this research aimed to identify the methods, processes, and outcomes related to the performance appraisals of assistant/associate deans.
Both deans and assistant/associate deans were surveyed.
Forty‐four of sixty‐six deans (66.
7 percent) and 227 of 315 assistant/associate deans (72.
1 percent) completed surveys with both close‐ended and open‐ended questions.
In addition, ten individuals from each group were interviewed.
Results indicate that 75–89 percent of assistant/associate deans are formally evaluated, although as many as 27 percent may lack formal job descriptions.
Some recommended best practices for performance appraisal are being used in a majority of colleges.
Examples of these best practices are having at least yearly appraisals, holding face‐to‐face meetings, and setting specific, personal performance objectives/benchmarks for assistant/associate deans.
Still, there is much room to improve appraisals by incorporating other recommended practices.
Relatively high levels of overall satisfaction were reported by both assistant/associate deans and deans for the process and outcomes of appraisals.
Assistant/associate deans rated the value of appraisals to overall development lower than did deans.
Qualitative data revealed definite opinions about what constitutes effective and ineffective appraisals, including the use of goal‐setting, timeliness, and necessary commitment.
Several critical issues related to the results are discussed: differences in perspectives on performance reviews, the importance of informal feedback and job descriptions, the influence of an assistant/associate deans’ lack of tenure, and the length of service of deans.
Lastly, recommendations for enhancing performance evaluations are offered.

Related Results

6 - Understanding the Factors that Influence Leadership Effectiveness of Deans in Ghana
6 - Understanding the Factors that Influence Leadership Effectiveness of Deans in Ghana
The paper describes and examines the factors that influence leadership effectiveness of deans and the concept of competence of deans using the evolution of deanship as a welfare sy...
Deans give advice to deans, Part I
Deans give advice to deans, Part I
Learning from the experience of others can save you time and potential heartache in any role. As it's been over 10 years since I've been a dean, I asked experienced deans who are i...
Performative Microforests
Performative Microforests
The design of office buildings can substantially improve the building, social, and ecological performance of office building projects. However, existing research on improving the p...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
The Hiring and Compensation Practices of Business School Deans
The Hiring and Compensation Practices of Business School Deans
This study uses a mixed methods approach to examine how business school deans alter the appointment status and salary structure of their faculty. In addition to analyzing interview...
Associate Staff Ministry
Associate Staff Ministry
This vital revised and expanded update to How to Thrive in Associate Staff Ministry (Alban, 2000) provides guidance to the growing population of staff members employed by churches....

Back to Top