Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Toward a Radically Embodied Neuroscience of Attachment and Relationships?
View through CrossRef
Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969/1982) posits the existence of internal working models as a foundational feature of human bonds. Radical embodied approaches instead suggest that cognition requires no computation or representation, favoring a cognition situated in a body in an environmental context with affordances for action (Barrett, 2011; Chemero, 2009; Wilson & Golonka, 2013). We explore whether embodied approaches to social soothing, interpersonal warmth, separation distress, and support seeking could replace representational constructs such as internal working models with a view of relationship cognition anchored in the resources afforded to the individual by their brain, body, and environment in interaction.We review the neurobiological bases for social attachments and relationships and attempt to delineate how these systems overlap or don’t with more basic physiological systems in ways that support or contradict a radical embodied explanation. We suggest that many effects might be the result of the fact that relationship cognition depends on and emerges out of the action of neural systems that regulate several clearly physically grounded systems. For example, the neuropeptide oxytocin appears to be central to attachment and pair-bond behavior (Carter & Keverne, 2002) and is implicated in social thermoregulation more broadly, being necessary for maintaining a warm body temperature as has been discovered in rats (Kasahara et al., 2007) and humans (Beck et al., 1979).Finally, we discuss the most challenging issues around taking a radically embodied perspective on social relationships. We find the most crucial challenge in individual differences in support seeking and responses to social contact, which have long been thought to be a function of representational structures in the mind (e.g., Baldwin, 1995). Together we entertain the thought to explain such individual differences without mediating representations or computations.This paper was published in Frontiers:Beckes, L., IJzerman, H., & Tops, M. (2015). Toward a radically embodied neuroscience of attachment and relationships. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9.
Title: Toward a Radically Embodied Neuroscience of Attachment and Relationships?
Description:
Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969/1982) posits the existence of internal working models as a foundational feature of human bonds.
Radical embodied approaches instead suggest that cognition requires no computation or representation, favoring a cognition situated in a body in an environmental context with affordances for action (Barrett, 2011; Chemero, 2009; Wilson & Golonka, 2013).
We explore whether embodied approaches to social soothing, interpersonal warmth, separation distress, and support seeking could replace representational constructs such as internal working models with a view of relationship cognition anchored in the resources afforded to the individual by their brain, body, and environment in interaction.
We review the neurobiological bases for social attachments and relationships and attempt to delineate how these systems overlap or don’t with more basic physiological systems in ways that support or contradict a radical embodied explanation.
We suggest that many effects might be the result of the fact that relationship cognition depends on and emerges out of the action of neural systems that regulate several clearly physically grounded systems.
For example, the neuropeptide oxytocin appears to be central to attachment and pair-bond behavior (Carter & Keverne, 2002) and is implicated in social thermoregulation more broadly, being necessary for maintaining a warm body temperature as has been discovered in rats (Kasahara et al.
, 2007) and humans (Beck et al.
, 1979).
Finally, we discuss the most challenging issues around taking a radically embodied perspective on social relationships.
We find the most crucial challenge in individual differences in support seeking and responses to social contact, which have long been thought to be a function of representational structures in the mind (e.
g.
, Baldwin, 1995).
Together we entertain the thought to explain such individual differences without mediating representations or computations.
This paper was published in Frontiers:Beckes, L.
, IJzerman, H.
, & Tops, M.
(2015).
Toward a radically embodied neuroscience of attachment and relationships.
Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9.
Related Results
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Fig. 1: Photo by Miguel Orós, from unsplash.comFeminism has stalled at the bedroom door. In the post-#metoo era, more than ever, we need intimate civil rights in our relationships ...
Examining the impact of emotional intelligence and attachment style on loneliness Alisha Azad Maldar * and Monalisa Nayak
Examining the impact of emotional intelligence and attachment style on loneliness Alisha Azad Maldar * and Monalisa Nayak
Background: Loneliness is a prevalent psychological phenomenon with significant implications for mental health and well-being. Attachment theory posits that early attachment experi...
Default defenses: the character defenses of attachment-anxiety and attachment-avoidance
Default defenses: the character defenses of attachment-anxiety and attachment-avoidance
Abstract
Contemporary attachment researchers claim that attachment-anxiety is associated with a hyperactivating defense strategy while attachment-avoidance is associated with a dea...
Comparative study to assess the maternal and paternal fetal attachment among the expectant mothers and fathers
Comparative study to assess the maternal and paternal fetal attachment among the expectant mothers and fathers
Background: Bonding during pregnancy refers to a process through which a pregnant women experiences feelings and emotions for her fetus, interacts with her fetus and develops a mat...
Dyadic trauma and attachment: A monozygotic twin study assessing the efficacy of Somatic Experiencing®
Dyadic trauma and attachment: A monozygotic twin study assessing the efficacy of Somatic Experiencing®
Orientation: Monozygotic twins offer a unique opportunity to examine the contagious nature of trauma in attachment dyads when one twin experiences trauma, but the other does not. D...
Pengaruh Attachment terhadap Self-Disclosure pada Pria Dewasa Awal yang Berpacaran
Pengaruh Attachment terhadap Self-Disclosure pada Pria Dewasa Awal yang Berpacaran
Berpacaran merupakan suatu tahapan bagi manusia untuk membangun attachment dengan lawan jenis yang umumnya dijalani saat berada di usia dewasa awal. Konflik tidak dapat dihindari d...
The motifs of radical embodied neuroscience
The motifs of radical embodied neuroscience
AbstractIn this paper, I analyse how the emerging scientific framework of radical embodied neuroscience is different from contemporary mainstream cognitive neuroscience. To do so, ...
Attachment to Manga (Japanese Comics)
Attachment to Manga (Japanese Comics)
The purpose of this study is twofold. First, it seeks to conceptualize attachment to manga (Japanese comics) by extrapolating attachment theory’s behavioral markers to manga reader...

