Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Performance Limits for Deepwater Pipelines
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
This paper highlights the differences between onshore and offshore pipeline design. It then summarizes the results of combined external pressure, tension, and bending testing on full scale 6 5/8" and 16" pipe, and uses these results to support suggestions for appropriate design formulas for combined external pressure, tension, and bending loads. Finally, purchasing suggestions for pipe subjected to severe deepwater loadings are presented.
INTRODUCTION
The Offshore Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association has in the past decade sponsored several research projects in the general area of pipe collapse [1,2]*. This research included theoretical work, small scale testing, and large scale testing. Many things were learned in the research. One object of this paper is to put these things in a convenient form which hopefully will be useful to the pipeline designer.
The Pipeline Design Codes have done a good job of providing guidance to designers of onshore pipelines [3,4]*. The rules for internal pressure design, reinforcement of penetrations and connections, and design for wind, seismic loads, weight, and thermal expansion are generally clear and adequate. However, offshore pipelines have some significant additional design requirements. Most of these requirements are due to the remote installation of pipelines under water. The remote installation means that different construction techniques have to be used offshore. Among these are laying pipe over a laybarge stinger with a significant unsupported span to bottom, or laying pipe from a reel barge, or pulling pipe through a J-tube to connect to an offshore platform. The latter two applications result in the pipe undergoing significant plastic deformations during the installation process which could lead to failure of the pipe. Another unique offshore loading is from the water itself which exerts external pressure on the line during construction and operation. This external pressure may cause the pipeline to collapse.
There are many cases of underwater pipelines where significant spans occur, such as the unsupported span from a laybarge, or where the lateral loads from weight or current are carried by a combination of tension and large deflections rather than bending moments. This structural behavior LS not accounted for in most piping design/analysis computer programs.
Finally, designers of offshore pipelines must consider on bottom stability problems not encountered in onshore pipelines. A pipeline resting on bottom or in a trench must often be coated with concrete to keep it from floating when evacuated. Currents exert lift and drag forces which tend to move the pipe laterally. These forces must be resisted by making the pipe sufficiently heavy. This is a complicated problem, and the Offshore Supervisory Committee has been very active in sponsoring research to define safe pipeline stability design procedures [5].
This paper outlines the offshore pipeline design process, and catalogues in convenient form formulas to consider collapse, collapse plus bending, and collapse plus tension. This paper also presents suggestions for purchase specifications to insure adequate properties in the pipe, both dimensionally and metallurgically.
Title: Performance Limits for Deepwater Pipelines
Description:
ABSTRACT
This paper highlights the differences between onshore and offshore pipeline design.
It then summarizes the results of combined external pressure, tension, and bending testing on full scale 6 5/8" and 16" pipe, and uses these results to support suggestions for appropriate design formulas for combined external pressure, tension, and bending loads.
Finally, purchasing suggestions for pipe subjected to severe deepwater loadings are presented.
INTRODUCTION
The Offshore Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association has in the past decade sponsored several research projects in the general area of pipe collapse [1,2]*.
This research included theoretical work, small scale testing, and large scale testing.
Many things were learned in the research.
One object of this paper is to put these things in a convenient form which hopefully will be useful to the pipeline designer.
The Pipeline Design Codes have done a good job of providing guidance to designers of onshore pipelines [3,4]*.
The rules for internal pressure design, reinforcement of penetrations and connections, and design for wind, seismic loads, weight, and thermal expansion are generally clear and adequate.
However, offshore pipelines have some significant additional design requirements.
Most of these requirements are due to the remote installation of pipelines under water.
The remote installation means that different construction techniques have to be used offshore.
Among these are laying pipe over a laybarge stinger with a significant unsupported span to bottom, or laying pipe from a reel barge, or pulling pipe through a J-tube to connect to an offshore platform.
The latter two applications result in the pipe undergoing significant plastic deformations during the installation process which could lead to failure of the pipe.
Another unique offshore loading is from the water itself which exerts external pressure on the line during construction and operation.
This external pressure may cause the pipeline to collapse.
There are many cases of underwater pipelines where significant spans occur, such as the unsupported span from a laybarge, or where the lateral loads from weight or current are carried by a combination of tension and large deflections rather than bending moments.
This structural behavior LS not accounted for in most piping design/analysis computer programs.
Finally, designers of offshore pipelines must consider on bottom stability problems not encountered in onshore pipelines.
A pipeline resting on bottom or in a trench must often be coated with concrete to keep it from floating when evacuated.
Currents exert lift and drag forces which tend to move the pipe laterally.
These forces must be resisted by making the pipe sufficiently heavy.
This is a complicated problem, and the Offshore Supervisory Committee has been very active in sponsoring research to define safe pipeline stability design procedures [5].
This paper outlines the offshore pipeline design process, and catalogues in convenient form formulas to consider collapse, collapse plus bending, and collapse plus tension.
This paper also presents suggestions for purchase specifications to insure adequate properties in the pipe, both dimensionally and metallurgically.
Related Results
New Tendon and Riser Technologies Improve TLP Competitiveness in Ultra- Deepwater
New Tendon and Riser Technologies Improve TLP Competitiveness in Ultra- Deepwater
Abstract
The extensive industry experience with design, fabrication, installation, and operation of TLPs in water depths up to 4,000 ft has demonstrated the flexi...
The Future of Regulations for the Deepwater GOM
The Future of Regulations for the Deepwater GOM
Abstract
Deepwater oil and gas activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Outer ContinentalShelf (OCS) are regulated by the Minerals Management Service (MMS). The leve...
Installation of Deepwater Pipelines With Sled Assemblies Using The New J-Lay System of the DCV Balder
Installation of Deepwater Pipelines With Sled Assemblies Using The New J-Lay System of the DCV Balder
Abstract
This paper describes the most important features required for installing deepwater pipelines, pipelines with in-line sled assemblies, PLETs, and SCRs. Th...
Reeled Risers: Deepwater and Dynamic Considerations
Reeled Risers: Deepwater and Dynamic Considerations
Abstract
Installation of steel pipelines and risers by the reel-lay method has been generating increasing interest, particularly for deepwater service. Reel-lay o...
Deepwater Cone Penetration Tests
Deepwater Cone Penetration Tests
Abstract
This paper focuses on ground investigation by deepwater cone penetration tests (CPT). All current offshore CPT systems deploy subtraction-type cone penet...
New Directions in TLP Technology
New Directions in TLP Technology
Abstract
Of the many deepwater platform concepts that were developed as deepwater platform technology matured, the TLP has been the most frequently selected for d...
Pigging Previously Unpiggable Pipelines
Pigging Previously Unpiggable Pipelines
Abstract
The efficient and safe transportation of fluids through pipelines has been a cornerstone of modern infrastructure for decades. However, pipeline operators o...
Morpeth SeaStar Mini-TLP
Morpeth SeaStar Mini-TLP
Abstract
The Morpeth project is the world's first application of a SeaStar®1 Mini-TLP and establishes that mono-column TLP's can be used to economically develop d...

