Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Benchmarking third‐party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis: an update

View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess the comparative strengths and weaknesses of leading third‐party logistics providers (3PLs) in the USA with respect to their financial efficiencies during the period of 2005‐2007. It also intends to identify various factors that significantly affect the financial efficiency of the 3PLs over time and propose ways to improve the competitiveness of 3PLs.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes data envelopment analysis to measure the financial efficiency of 12 leading 3PLs in the USA, relative to their key competitors. In particular, this paper develops the Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (CCR) model that is designed to derive weights without being fixed in advance. It also employes the Banker, Charnes, and Cooper (BCC) model to mitigate the impact of 3PL sizes on the 3PLs' financial efficiency.FindingsThe rapid expansion of the business scope can undermine the financial efficiency of 3PLs due to huge start‐up investments. In particular, business expansion through mergers and acquisitions can hurt the financial efficiency of 3PLs due to restructuring and re‐branding costs. The non‐asset based 3PLs have the less financial burden than their asset‐based counterparts due to their limited investment in assets. But, the asset‐based 3PLs such as J.B. Hunt can still overcome such a burden by streamlining their logistics services and focusing on their niche areas.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper primarily uses financial measures as the major output. Thus, it can be extended to include some non‐financial measures. Owing to the difficulty in finding some secondary data sources about the 3PL industry, only 12 leading 3PLs are compared to each other with respect to their relative financial efficiency.Practical implicationsThis paper provides several practical guidelines as to how 3PLs can cope with increasing competition, cost pressures, and changing business environments and what the future holds for the maturing 3PL industry.Originality/valueThis paper reveals the current weaknesses of the leading 3PLs and identifies challenges and opportunities for the 3PL market in the USA. In addition, it helps 3PLs formulate the future survival and growth strategies by providing the detailed picture of where they stand in terms of competitiveness. In so doing, this paper identifies important sources of 3PLs' financial inefficiencies, while uncovering the secret behind the improvement of their financial efficiencies.
Title: Benchmarking third‐party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis: an update
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess the comparative strengths and weaknesses of leading third‐party logistics providers (3PLs) in the USA with respect to their financial efficiencies during the period of 2005‐2007.
It also intends to identify various factors that significantly affect the financial efficiency of the 3PLs over time and propose ways to improve the competitiveness of 3PLs.
Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes data envelopment analysis to measure the financial efficiency of 12 leading 3PLs in the USA, relative to their key competitors.
In particular, this paper develops the Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (CCR) model that is designed to derive weights without being fixed in advance.
It also employes the Banker, Charnes, and Cooper (BCC) model to mitigate the impact of 3PL sizes on the 3PLs' financial efficiency.
FindingsThe rapid expansion of the business scope can undermine the financial efficiency of 3PLs due to huge start‐up investments.
In particular, business expansion through mergers and acquisitions can hurt the financial efficiency of 3PLs due to restructuring and re‐branding costs.
The non‐asset based 3PLs have the less financial burden than their asset‐based counterparts due to their limited investment in assets.
But, the asset‐based 3PLs such as J.
B.
Hunt can still overcome such a burden by streamlining their logistics services and focusing on their niche areas.
Research limitations/implicationsThis paper primarily uses financial measures as the major output.
Thus, it can be extended to include some non‐financial measures.
Owing to the difficulty in finding some secondary data sources about the 3PL industry, only 12 leading 3PLs are compared to each other with respect to their relative financial efficiency.
Practical implicationsThis paper provides several practical guidelines as to how 3PLs can cope with increasing competition, cost pressures, and changing business environments and what the future holds for the maturing 3PL industry.
Originality/valueThis paper reveals the current weaknesses of the leading 3PLs and identifies challenges and opportunities for the 3PL market in the USA.
In addition, it helps 3PLs formulate the future survival and growth strategies by providing the detailed picture of where they stand in terms of competitiveness.
In so doing, this paper identifies important sources of 3PLs' financial inefficiencies, while uncovering the secret behind the improvement of their financial efficiencies.

Related Results

Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e‐commerce market
Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e‐commerce market
PurposeEffective and efficient supply chain management is critical to the success of firms engaging in e‐commerce. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of logistics c...
Equilibrium Study of Logistics Demand and Logistics Resource Allocation in Guangdong Province
Equilibrium Study of Logistics Demand and Logistics Resource Allocation in Guangdong Province
Abstract Logistics serve as a crucial link between production and consumption. The balanced allocation of logistics demand and resources can promote the balanced developmen...
A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures
A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to redress the imbalances in the past literature of supply chain benchmarking and enhance data envelopment analysis (DEA) modeling approach in s...
Diagnosis of delivery vulnerability in a logistics system for logistics risk management
Diagnosis of delivery vulnerability in a logistics system for logistics risk management
PurposeDelivery vulnerability is a critically important theme in logistics risk management. However, while logistics service providers often collect and retain massive amounts of l...
An optimisational model of benchmarking
An optimisational model of benchmarking
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a quantitative methodology for benchmarking process which is simple, effective and efficient as a rejoinder to benchmarking detractor...
An Investigation of Cross-Border E-Commerce Logistics and Develop Strategies Through SCCOM Framework and Logistic Service Risk Analysis
An Investigation of Cross-Border E-Commerce Logistics and Develop Strategies Through SCCOM Framework and Logistic Service Risk Analysis
Cross-border e-commerce has become popular recently, so the importance of cross-border logistics has been enhanced. Because foreign buyers have high demand for logistics time, stre...
Development prediction of logistics industry in Henan province and its dynamic analysis
Development prediction of logistics industry in Henan province and its dynamic analysis
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to establish a group of grey prediction models and relative degree model to study the characteristics and trend of the logist...
The need for adaptive processes of benchmarking in small business‐to‐business services
The need for adaptive processes of benchmarking in small business‐to‐business services
PurposeThis paper aims to explore current management attitudes towards benchmarking and its implementation within small business‐to‐business service firms in order to enhance a dee...

Back to Top