Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Spoken Word Recognition
View through CrossRef
The core question that spoken word recognition research attempts to address is: How does a phonological word-form activate the corresponding lexical representation that is stored in the mental lexicon? While speech perception research (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics article “Speech Perception”) focuses on the mapping of highly variable acoustic signal onto more abstract phonological units, spoken word recognition focuses on the mapping of phonological information onto lexical and semantic representations—the repository of linguistic knowledge stored in a “mental dictionary” or the mental lexicon (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics article “Mental Lexicon”). Earlier theoretical work considers the three following stages as being fundamental to spoken word recognition. First, there is activation of multiple word forms that share some phonological similarity to the auditory input. Second, there is a selection stage whereby activated word forms compete with each other for recognition. Finally, when a single lexical candidate remains, its meaning is accessed and is then integrated with higher levels of processing (e.g., with sentential or discourse information). Although these stages of spoken word recognition are presented as being part of a serial process, it is important to note that current theoretical and empirical work in the field emphasize the highly parallel, incremental, and continuous nature of spoken word recognition—even though theories of spoken word recognition continue to differ greatly in their description and conceptualization of these “stages,” and in the computational implementation of competition and lexical selection mechanisms. The temporal, fleeting nature of acoustic input creates unique theoretical and empirical challenges for the field, for instance, the challenge of word segmentation in continuous speech and for embedded words, which has traditionally progressed at a more gradual pace relative to research in visual word recognition (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics article “Visual Word Recognition”). Nevertheless, in the almost sixty years of its history, spoken word recognition research has led to the discovery of a number of lexical-semantic and contextual factors that influence the speed and accuracy of spoken word recognition. Lexical-semantic factors refer to the lexical and semantic properties of individual words, for instance, its frequency of occurrence in the language or its extent of phonological similarity to other words in the language. Contextual factors refer to how characteristics of the talker and listener, as well as environmental features or noise, can create suboptimal conditions for spoken word recognition. In addition, the robust top-down influences of lexical knowledge on sublexical representations highlight how the integration of top-down information and bottom-up perceptual input forms a crucial feature of models of spoken word recognition. These empirical findings provide important constraints on the development of models and theories that attempt to explain the cognitive mechanisms that support the retrieval of spoken words from the lexicon.
Title: Spoken Word Recognition
Description:
The core question that spoken word recognition research attempts to address is: How does a phonological word-form activate the corresponding lexical representation that is stored in the mental lexicon? While speech perception research (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics article “Speech Perception”) focuses on the mapping of highly variable acoustic signal onto more abstract phonological units, spoken word recognition focuses on the mapping of phonological information onto lexical and semantic representations—the repository of linguistic knowledge stored in a “mental dictionary” or the mental lexicon (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics article “Mental Lexicon”).
Earlier theoretical work considers the three following stages as being fundamental to spoken word recognition.
First, there is activation of multiple word forms that share some phonological similarity to the auditory input.
Second, there is a selection stage whereby activated word forms compete with each other for recognition.
Finally, when a single lexical candidate remains, its meaning is accessed and is then integrated with higher levels of processing (e.
g.
, with sentential or discourse information).
Although these stages of spoken word recognition are presented as being part of a serial process, it is important to note that current theoretical and empirical work in the field emphasize the highly parallel, incremental, and continuous nature of spoken word recognition—even though theories of spoken word recognition continue to differ greatly in their description and conceptualization of these “stages,” and in the computational implementation of competition and lexical selection mechanisms.
The temporal, fleeting nature of acoustic input creates unique theoretical and empirical challenges for the field, for instance, the challenge of word segmentation in continuous speech and for embedded words, which has traditionally progressed at a more gradual pace relative to research in visual word recognition (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics article “Visual Word Recognition”).
Nevertheless, in the almost sixty years of its history, spoken word recognition research has led to the discovery of a number of lexical-semantic and contextual factors that influence the speed and accuracy of spoken word recognition.
Lexical-semantic factors refer to the lexical and semantic properties of individual words, for instance, its frequency of occurrence in the language or its extent of phonological similarity to other words in the language.
Contextual factors refer to how characteristics of the talker and listener, as well as environmental features or noise, can create suboptimal conditions for spoken word recognition.
In addition, the robust top-down influences of lexical knowledge on sublexical representations highlight how the integration of top-down information and bottom-up perceptual input forms a crucial feature of models of spoken word recognition.
These empirical findings provide important constraints on the development of models and theories that attempt to explain the cognitive mechanisms that support the retrieval of spoken words from the lexicon.
Related Results
Medical Word Recognition Overestimates Comprehension Among Hospitalized Adults
Medical Word Recognition Overestimates Comprehension Among Hospitalized Adults
Health literacy screening in clinical settings often relies on brief word-recognition tools, such as the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine–Short Form (REALM-SF), based o...
<span class="word">A <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Technique <span class="word">for <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Constructing <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabl
<span class="word">A <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Technique <span class="word">for <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Constructing <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabl
To solve the problem of constructing the frequency responses (FR) of filters on switched capacitors, which belong to the class of electronic circuits with a periodically changing s...
Written rather than spoken language experience predicts speed of spoken word recognition
Written rather than spoken language experience predicts speed of spoken word recognition
Cultural experiences can be a powerful influence on human cognition. Here, we asked whether the experience with written language, a human cultural invention, predicts the speed of ...
<span class="word">Successful <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Replacement <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Therapy <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">After <span c
<span class="word">Successful <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Replacement <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Therapy <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">After <span c
Background. Vitamin D has recognized immunomodulatory, anti-proliferative, and differentiation-regulating effects primarily mediated through its genomic effects via the vitamin D r...
<span class="word">Exploratory <span class="word allCaps">AI-<span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Assisted <span class="word allCaps">ML <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Screening <s
<span class="word">Exploratory <span class="word allCaps">AI-<span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Assisted <span class="word allCaps">ML <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Screening <s
This technical note reports an exploratory, AI-assisted in silico proof of concept implementing a “signaling first, killing later” discovery paradigm: prioritizing compounds with h...
<span class="word">IMGT® <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Nomenclature <span class="word">of <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Immunoglobulins (<span class="word allCaps">IG) <spa
<span class="word">IMGT® <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Nomenclature <span class="word">of <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Immunoglobulins (<span class="word allCaps">IG) <spa
The immunoglobulins (IG) or antibodies and the T cell receptors (TR) are the antigen receptors of the adaptive immune responses (AIR) of the jawed vertebrates (Gnathostomata). IMGT...
<span class="word">Strontium <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Substitution, <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Coordination <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Chemistry
<span class="word">Strontium <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Substitution, <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Coordination <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Chemistry
This study investigates the effect of progressive CaO/SrO substitution on the structure, crystallisation behaviour, and coordination chemistry of fluorapatite-forming glass-ceramic...
Sexual Harassment Survivor's Self Disclosure in Twitter
Sexual Harassment Survivor's Self Disclosure in Twitter
Purpose: Word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word Purpose : The purpose of this qualitative study is to investigate how s...

