Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

STAPLES VS. SUTURES IN ABDOMINAL CLOSURE

View through CrossRef
Surgical wound closure is critical for optimal healing, infection prevention, and cosmetic outcomes. Traditional sutures and skin staples represent two primary techniques, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Sutures offer flexibility, strength, and cost-effectiveness but require longer application time and may lead to suboptimal scarring. Staples, typically made of stainless steel, promise speed, reduced tissue reactivity, and improved wound eversion but incur higher costs and may cause greater discomfort during removal. This review synthesizes evidence from a recent comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of staples versus sutures in elective abdominal surgeries, focusing on closure time, cosmesis, A study showed that infection rates to predict the likelihood that a patient will develop a surgical wound infection from several risk factors, the authors used information collected on 58,498 patients undergoing operations in 1970 to develop a simple multivariate risk index the validity of this index as a predictor of surgical wound infection risk was verified. With the simplified index, a subgroup, consisting of half the surgical patients, can be identified in whom 90% of the surgical wound infections will develop. Use of this new index might substantially increase the efficiency of routine surgical wound infection surveillance and control (Haley et al., 1985) and cost-effectiveness.. In one study After orthopaedic surgery, there is a significantly higher risk of developing a wound infection when the wound is closed with staples rather than sutures. This risk is specifically greater in patients who undergo hip surgery. The use of staples for closing hip or knee surgery wounds after orthopaedic procedures cannot be recommended, though the evidence comes from studies with substantial methodological limitations. Though we advise orthopaedic surgeons to reconsider their use of staples for wound closure, definitive randomised trials are still needed to assess this research question(Smith et al., 2010).The type of suture material for skin closure is also reported to influence postoperative wound complications. However, other studies have failed to demonstrate significant differences between different types of suture material(chandrashekar et.al 2013)
Title: STAPLES VS. SUTURES IN ABDOMINAL CLOSURE
Description:
Surgical wound closure is critical for optimal healing, infection prevention, and cosmetic outcomes.
Traditional sutures and skin staples represent two primary techniques, each with distinct advantages and limitations.
Sutures offer flexibility, strength, and cost-effectiveness but require longer application time and may lead to suboptimal scarring.
Staples, typically made of stainless steel, promise speed, reduced tissue reactivity, and improved wound eversion but incur higher costs and may cause greater discomfort during removal.
This review synthesizes evidence from a recent comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of staples versus sutures in elective abdominal surgeries, focusing on closure time, cosmesis, A study showed that infection rates to predict the likelihood that a patient will develop a surgical wound infection from several risk factors, the authors used information collected on 58,498 patients undergoing operations in 1970 to develop a simple multivariate risk index the validity of this index as a predictor of surgical wound infection risk was verified.
With the simplified index, a subgroup, consisting of half the surgical patients, can be identified in whom 90% of the surgical wound infections will develop.
Use of this new index might substantially increase the efficiency of routine surgical wound infection surveillance and control (Haley et al.
, 1985) and cost-effectiveness.
In one study After orthopaedic surgery, there is a significantly higher risk of developing a wound infection when the wound is closed with staples rather than sutures.
This risk is specifically greater in patients who undergo hip surgery.
The use of staples for closing hip or knee surgery wounds after orthopaedic procedures cannot be recommended, though the evidence comes from studies with substantial methodological limitations.
Though we advise orthopaedic surgeons to reconsider their use of staples for wound closure, definitive randomised trials are still needed to assess this research question(Smith et al.
, 2010).
The type of suture material for skin closure is also reported to influence postoperative wound complications.
However, other studies have failed to demonstrate significant differences between different types of suture material(chandrashekar et.
al 2013).

Related Results

Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Sigmoid volvulus is an underrecognized diagnosis with potentially fatal outcomes in adolescents; the current study aims to present an adolescent with mild sym...
COMPARISON TENSILE STRENGTH OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE SUTURES
COMPARISON TENSILE STRENGTH OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE SUTURES
Objective: The aim of the investigation is to evaluate and to compare the tensile strength of commercial natural and synthetic absorbable suturematerials currently used in surgery....
The predictive factors that are associated with the number of sutures used during meniscal repair
The predictive factors that are associated with the number of sutures used during meniscal repair
Abstract PurposeTo investigate factors associated with the consumption of a large number of sutures during arthroscopic meniscus repair procedures.MethodsAll patients who r...
Coated Surgical Sutures: Nanoparticles and nanocomposite as coating materials for absorbable and nonabsorbable wound closure devices
Coated Surgical Sutures: Nanoparticles and nanocomposite as coating materials for absorbable and nonabsorbable wound closure devices
Abstract Upgrading the surgical sutures, as the main wound closure device, is essential. The evolution of bacterial resistance and the plummeting of antibiotics have direct...
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Primary renal Ewing sarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor, representing less than 1% of all renal tumors. This case report contributes valuable in...
Avaliação da dor abdominal aguda em adultos
Avaliação da dor abdominal aguda em adultos
Introdução: A maioria dos pacientes com dor abdominal tem uma etiologia benigna e/ou autolimitada. O objetivo inicial da avaliação é identificar os pacientes que têm uma etiologia ...
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Suture is an underreported cause for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) that can cause significant morbidity. This report describes a case of TOA arising from a silk ...
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Background and Objectives: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently encountered in patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery and is associated with adverse outc...

Back to Top