Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackground: Several studies reported the comparability of digital stent enhancement techniques (including stent boost imaging) in detecting suboptimal results of coronary stenting with Intra Vascular Ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Aims: to assess results of stent deployment and determine the incidence of suboptimal results requiring changing final decision using stent boost imaging. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 120 patients eligible for PCI were recruited during a period of one year (January 2021 to 2022) using DES. Results: Suboptimal results were found in 38% of the PCI cases with stents (angiography guided). Importantly it was found that improper lesion preparation in our practice could not help improving stent optimization. Also, angiography guided PCI has significant incidence of suboptimal results. Digital stent enhancement techniques like stent boost have significant and important value in better decision making. After adjusting for age and sex, six factors were identified as independent predictors for final decision change (stent length, LAD/RCA affection, proximal segment affection, calcification, and optical coherence tomography. Conclusion: This study has confirmed the utility of stent boost for the optimization of PCI in daily practice. Stent Boost is a simple and costless technique that provides an accurate assessment of a deployed stent without extending the procedure time and without more risk. It appears to be useful for the immediate evaluation of stent expansion and optimization of PCI by additional post-dilatation, when appropriate. Future studies are needed to determine whether Stent Boost data will correlate with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
Title: Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
Description:
AbstractBackground: Several studies reported the comparability of digital stent enhancement techniques (including stent boost imaging) in detecting suboptimal results of coronary stenting with Intra Vascular Ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
Aims: to assess results of stent deployment and determine the incidence of suboptimal results requiring changing final decision using stent boost imaging.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 120 patients eligible for PCI were recruited during a period of one year (January 2021 to 2022) using DES.
Results: Suboptimal results were found in 38% of the PCI cases with stents (angiography guided).
Importantly it was found that improper lesion preparation in our practice could not help improving stent optimization.
Also, angiography guided PCI has significant incidence of suboptimal results.
Digital stent enhancement techniques like stent boost have significant and important value in better decision making.
After adjusting for age and sex, six factors were identified as independent predictors for final decision change (stent length, LAD/RCA affection, proximal segment affection, calcification, and optical coherence tomography.
Conclusion: This study has confirmed the utility of stent boost for the optimization of PCI in daily practice.
Stent Boost is a simple and costless technique that provides an accurate assessment of a deployed stent without extending the procedure time and without more risk.
It appears to be useful for the immediate evaluation of stent expansion and optimization of PCI by additional post-dilatation, when appropriate.
Future studies are needed to determine whether Stent Boost data will correlate with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Predictors of Side Branch Obstruction Following Stenting of the Main Vessel in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
Predictors of Side Branch Obstruction Following Stenting of the Main Vessel in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions is complicated by the presence of side branch blockage, which contributes to a low procedural success ...
Ostial Right Coronary Artery Stent Loss, Stent-In-Stent Entrapment, and Subsequent Surgical Extraction
Ostial Right Coronary Artery Stent Loss, Stent-In-Stent Entrapment, and Subsequent Surgical Extraction
Abstract Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions is fraught with short-term and long-term risks. Judicious use of adjunct intracoronary...
Predictors of insistent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention
Predictors of insistent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention
Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The first percutaneous coronary intervention was performed by Andreas Gruntzig on Septemb...
Clinical Outcomes for Single Stent and Multiple Stents in Contemporary Practice
Clinical Outcomes for Single Stent and Multiple Stents in Contemporary Practice
AbstractBackgroundStents had been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the treatment of severe coronary artery disease (CAD); however, the current knowledge on percutaneous cor...

Back to Top