Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Applying Criterion-Based Indications for Vascular Ultrasound Studies: Planning Quality Improvement
View through CrossRef
Introduction Although most ultrasound facilities rely on the referring physicians' request for testing, inappropriate indications for ultrasound studies have been cited as a quality metric and source of poor resource use. In 2015, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission mandated that ultrasound facilities undertake educational and other strategies to address this as a quality improvement initiative, including education of referring physicians. We proposed to study the indications noted in referrals to develop such quality strategies. Methods Dedicated vascular ultrasound facilities were asked to participate. An electronic search of guidelines, standards, and criteria for testing was done. The indication for testing in consecutive patients was collated with adherence to standards and criteria for testing, type of referring physician, patient demographics, and findings. Care gaps were identified to serve as a “needs assessment” for educational and other strategies to address quality improvement. Results Three facilities agreed to participate (one academic, two community). A total of 4,654 studies were analyzed. The vascular domains included were: carotid (610), aorta (217), renal (52), upper extremity arteries (56), lower extremity arteries (1,465), lower extremity venous for deep venous thrombosis (1,377), and lower extremity venous for chronic venous insufficiency (877). Overall, appropriate criteria were cited for 76–96% of studies; the academic facility had higher adherence. There was no difference between family physician and specialist referrals. Diagnostic positive yields were found in 48–68% in different test categories; aortic screening yield was 8.1%. Specific “teaching points” included “headaches” and “neck pain” for carotid studies, aortic screening outside of “targets,” “numb toes,” and “swelling” for arterial duplex; no clear issues were identified for venous studies. Conclusions This study does identify inappropriate indications for vascular ultrasound with no systematic findings. There are specific teaching points that can be used to direct educational strategies for referring physicians.
Title: Applying Criterion-Based Indications for Vascular Ultrasound Studies: Planning Quality Improvement
Description:
Introduction Although most ultrasound facilities rely on the referring physicians' request for testing, inappropriate indications for ultrasound studies have been cited as a quality metric and source of poor resource use.
In 2015, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission mandated that ultrasound facilities undertake educational and other strategies to address this as a quality improvement initiative, including education of referring physicians.
We proposed to study the indications noted in referrals to develop such quality strategies.
Methods Dedicated vascular ultrasound facilities were asked to participate.
An electronic search of guidelines, standards, and criteria for testing was done.
The indication for testing in consecutive patients was collated with adherence to standards and criteria for testing, type of referring physician, patient demographics, and findings.
Care gaps were identified to serve as a “needs assessment” for educational and other strategies to address quality improvement.
Results Three facilities agreed to participate (one academic, two community).
A total of 4,654 studies were analyzed.
The vascular domains included were: carotid (610), aorta (217), renal (52), upper extremity arteries (56), lower extremity arteries (1,465), lower extremity venous for deep venous thrombosis (1,377), and lower extremity venous for chronic venous insufficiency (877).
Overall, appropriate criteria were cited for 76–96% of studies; the academic facility had higher adherence.
There was no difference between family physician and specialist referrals.
Diagnostic positive yields were found in 48–68% in different test categories; aortic screening yield was 8.
1%.
Specific “teaching points” included “headaches” and “neck pain” for carotid studies, aortic screening outside of “targets,” “numb toes,” and “swelling” for arterial duplex; no clear issues were identified for venous studies.
Conclusions This study does identify inappropriate indications for vascular ultrasound with no systematic findings.
There are specific teaching points that can be used to direct educational strategies for referring physicians.
Related Results
A Bibliometric Survey of Publications in Vascular Ultrasound
A Bibliometric Survey of Publications in Vascular Ultrasound
Access to a body of published research is important to the development of research and to inform quality patient care. Measures of such activities are determined by bibliometric an...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Revisiting the Role of Ultrasound Mapping in Arteriovenous Fistula Formation: A Single-Center Experience
Revisiting the Role of Ultrasound Mapping in Arteriovenous Fistula Formation: A Single-Center Experience
Background: The global prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase, with the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the most preferred vascular access for hemodialysis...
Predicted Differences and Differences between Predictions
Predicted Differences and Differences between Predictions
When K tests are given to N individuals, and for each individual there are two criterion measures, then (1) the multiple regression weight to be applied to the standard score for e...
Efficacy and Safety of Fusion Imaging in Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Fusion Imaging in Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), generally performed under real-time guidance of ultrasound which is safe and effective, is a common minimally invasive therapy for treati...
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Optimization criterion for spacecraft observation planning algorithms
Optimization criterion for spacecraft observation planning algorithms
Objectives. One of the critical tasks of space monitoring is the planning of observations due to the quality and amount of information obtained depending on how well the observatio...
POCUS in Acute Medicine
POCUS in Acute Medicine
In this edition of Acute Medicine, Knight et al. demonstrate from SAMBA data that access to ultrasound machines and supervision is geographically heterogeneous.1 They raise concern...

