Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Predicted Differences and Differences between Predictions
View through CrossRef
When K tests are given to N individuals, and for each individual there are two criterion measures, then (1) the multiple regression weight to be applied to the standard score for each test to predict the criterion-difference score equals the difference of the weights for predicting each criterion separately; (2) the difference between the predicted scores equals the predicted difference (each test being assigned the appropriate multiple regression weight); (3) the square of the multiple correlation between predicted and actual criterion-difference scores equals the sum of squares of the multiple correlations of the battery with each criterion less the product of these correlations and the correlation between predicted scores all divided by twice the quantity one minus the criterion intercorrelation; and (4) the variance of errors of estimating the criterion-difference score equals the sum of the variances of errors of estimating each criterion score minus twice the criterion intercorrelation, plus twice the correlation between predicted scores multiplied by the product of the square root of one minus the variance of errors of estimating one criterion and the corresponding square root for the second criterion.
Title: Predicted Differences and Differences between Predictions
Description:
When K tests are given to N individuals, and for each individual there are two criterion measures, then (1) the multiple regression weight to be applied to the standard score for each test to predict the criterion-difference score equals the difference of the weights for predicting each criterion separately; (2) the difference between the predicted scores equals the predicted difference (each test being assigned the appropriate multiple regression weight); (3) the square of the multiple correlation between predicted and actual criterion-difference scores equals the sum of squares of the multiple correlations of the battery with each criterion less the product of these correlations and the correlation between predicted scores all divided by twice the quantity one minus the criterion intercorrelation; and (4) the variance of errors of estimating the criterion-difference score equals the sum of the variances of errors of estimating each criterion score minus twice the criterion intercorrelation, plus twice the correlation between predicted scores multiplied by the product of the square root of one minus the variance of errors of estimating one criterion and the corresponding square root for the second criterion.
Related Results
Hospital Discharge Prediction Using Machine Learning
Hospital Discharge Prediction Using Machine Learning
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Reliable hospital discharge predictions still remain an unmet need. In this study, we aimed to forecast dail...
Cost of ungrammatical predictions during online sentence processing: evidence against surprisal
Cost of ungrammatical predictions during online sentence processing: evidence against surprisal
The surprisal metric (Hale, 2001; Levy, 2008) successfully predicts syntactic complexity in a large number of online studies (e.g., Demberg and Keller, 2009; Levy and Keller, 2013...
P–469 Period Tracker Applications – are they giving women accurate menstrual cycle information?
P–469 Period Tracker Applications – are they giving women accurate menstrual cycle information?
Abstract
Study question
Are period trackers giving women accurate information about their periods and ovulation?
...
P-469 Period Tracker Applications – are they giving women accurate menstrual cycle information?
P-469 Period Tracker Applications – are they giving women accurate menstrual cycle information?
Abstract
Study question
Are period trackers giving women accurate information about their periods and ovulation?
...
Adaptive reliance on the most stable sensory predictions enhances perceptual feature extraction of moving stimuli
Adaptive reliance on the most stable sensory predictions enhances perceptual feature extraction of moving stimuli
The prediction of the sensory outcomes of action is thought to be useful for distinguishing self- vs. externally generated sensations, correcting movements when sensory feedback is...
A sequence-based approach for identifying protein fold switchers
A sequence-based approach for identifying protein fold switchers
Abstract
Although most proteins conform to the classical one-structure/one-function paradigm, an increasing number of proteins with dual structures and functions ar...
Modeling Elk Nutrition and Habitat Use in Western Oregon and Washington
Modeling Elk Nutrition and Habitat Use in Western Oregon and Washington
ABSTRACTStudies of habitat selection and use by wildlife, especially large herbivores, are foundational for understanding their ecology and management, especially if predictors of ...
CELLULAR AUTOMATA (CA) CONTIGUITY FILTERS IMPACTS ON CA MARKOV MODELING OF LAND USE LAND COVER CHANGE PREDICTIONS RESULTS
CELLULAR AUTOMATA (CA) CONTIGUITY FILTERS IMPACTS ON CA MARKOV MODELING OF LAND USE LAND COVER CHANGE PREDICTIONS RESULTS
Abstract. In this study, attempts has been made to find out cellular automata (CA) contiguity filters impacts on Land use land cover change predictions results. Cellular Automata (...

