Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Frequency of Uterine Scar Dehiscence in Women with Previous One Cesarean Section
View through CrossRef
Background: Uterine scar dehiscence is a significant complication in women with a history of cesarean section, with implications for maternal and fetal health. Identifying risk factors and early detection is crucial for improving outcomes. While various demographic and clinical factors have been implicated, the association between maternal age, gestational age, parity, and hypertension with uterine scar dehiscence has not been fully explored in the local population. Objective: To determine the frequency of uterine scar dehiscence in women with previous one cesarean section. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from January 2024 to July 2024 at a Mardan Medical Complex in Mardan, Pakistan. Methodology: A total of 109 women aged 18–40 years, with a singleton pregnancy of >32 weeks gestation and abdominal pain, were included. Ultrasound was performed by a senior consultant radiologist to assess uterine scar dehiscence, with clinical criteria based on scar tenderness and specific ultrasound findings. Results: The overall incidence of uterine scar dehiscence was 13.8%, with higher rates observed in women over 30 years (23.6%), those with a gestational age >39 weeks (47.6%), and women with higher parity (>4; 48%). Significant associations were found between uterine scar dehiscence and maternal age (p=0.004), gestational age (p<0.001), parity (p<0.001), and hypertension (p<0.001). No significant association was found with diabetes (p=0.701). Conclusion: The study concludes uterine scar dehiscence is a significant complication in women with prior cesarean sections, influenced by factors like age, parity, and hypertension, emphasizing the need for further research and protocols
Indus Publishers
Title: Frequency of Uterine Scar Dehiscence in Women with Previous One Cesarean Section
Description:
Background: Uterine scar dehiscence is a significant complication in women with a history of cesarean section, with implications for maternal and fetal health.
Identifying risk factors and early detection is crucial for improving outcomes.
While various demographic and clinical factors have been implicated, the association between maternal age, gestational age, parity, and hypertension with uterine scar dehiscence has not been fully explored in the local population.
Objective: To determine the frequency of uterine scar dehiscence in women with previous one cesarean section.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from January 2024 to July 2024 at a Mardan Medical Complex in Mardan, Pakistan.
Methodology: A total of 109 women aged 18–40 years, with a singleton pregnancy of >32 weeks gestation and abdominal pain, were included.
Ultrasound was performed by a senior consultant radiologist to assess uterine scar dehiscence, with clinical criteria based on scar tenderness and specific ultrasound findings.
Results: The overall incidence of uterine scar dehiscence was 13.
8%, with higher rates observed in women over 30 years (23.
6%), those with a gestational age >39 weeks (47.
6%), and women with higher parity (>4; 48%).
Significant associations were found between uterine scar dehiscence and maternal age (p=0.
004), gestational age (p<0.
001), parity (p<0.
001), and hypertension (p<0.
001).
No significant association was found with diabetes (p=0.
701).
Conclusion: The study concludes uterine scar dehiscence is a significant complication in women with prior cesarean sections, influenced by factors like age, parity, and hypertension, emphasizing the need for further research and protocols.
Related Results
Safety of Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous One Cesarean Section
Safety of Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous One Cesarean Section
ABSTRACT
Objective
To evaluate the safety and integrity of scar at repeat cesarean section, in patients with previous one cesarean section performed at different settings.
Study...
Evaluation of Uterine Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section
Evaluation of Uterine Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section
To evaluate the safety and integrity of uterine scar at repeat cesarean section in patients with previous one cesarean section (C/S). A prospective study was Carried out in a terti...
Comparison between Intraoperative and Ultrasound Determined Cesarean Scar Thickness after Elective Cesarean Sections and Unplanned Cesarean Sections in Subsequent Term Pregnancies
Comparison between Intraoperative and Ultrasound Determined Cesarean Scar Thickness after Elective Cesarean Sections and Unplanned Cesarean Sections in Subsequent Term Pregnancies
Background
Cesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide. As a result, women presenting with pregnancy with previous CS are also rising. Previous CS is bec...
Beyond the Scar: A Case Report on the Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Nuances, and Surgical Management of Type I Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
Beyond the Scar: A Case Report on the Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Nuances, and Surgical Management of Type I Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
Background: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy where the gestational sac implants within the fibrous tissue of a previous cesarean section scar. Its ...
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recove...
Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Introduction: A variant of extrapelvic endometriosis known as "surgical scar endometriosis" is defined by the development of functional endometrial glands and stroma close to the s...
A Tale of Two Cesarean Hemi-Hysterectomies
A Tale of Two Cesarean Hemi-Hysterectomies
Background: Congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) result from abnormal formation, differentiation, fusion or reabsorption of the Müllerian ducts during fetal life1. Complete fusion fa...
Prospects of vaginal delivery after more than two caesarean sections
Prospects of vaginal delivery after more than two caesarean sections
Objective. To evaluate the prospects for vaginal delivery after more than two cesarean sections (CS). Material and methods. A prospective multicenter cohort study was performed bet...

